Re: [rules-dev] RFC: declaration syntax

2011-07-26 Thread Wolfgang Laun
On 26 July 2011 21:28, Edson Tirelli wrote: > QUESTION: >As we can see above, we will need several new constructs in order to > support features in our roadmap. We have the choice of making them all top > level constructs, making the error recovery in the parser a lot more > complicated, or

Re: [rules-dev] 5.3

2011-07-26 Thread Wolfgang Laun
So as not to hear (from Mark) again that "it is too late to fix this JIRA" - look at the long list of open JIRAs, *now*! -W On 26 July 2011 20:37, Geoffrey De Smet wrote: > ** > All, > > I 'll try to release 5.3.0.Beta1 directly from master, so please keep an > eye on hudson. > > Current problem

Re: [rules-dev] i want to store the rules in the database, can someone help me ?

2011-07-26 Thread Wolfgang Laun
This list is for communication between Drools developers. Please post user questions on the "Rules Users List" . 2011/7/27 祝英杰 > When I use the drools, > > I want to store the rules in the SQL Server Database, > > Can someone help me and give me some advices, how do I do it? > > **

[rules-dev] A major 5.2 letdown

2011-07-26 Thread Wolfgang Laun
Given the following rule replicated for enums EDay.SUNDAY through EDay.THURSDAY and a single DummyTester fact starting with EDay.SUNDAY. rule "Sunday" when $dt: DummyTester(EDay.SUNDAY == day) then System.out.println("RULE: entered rule: "+drools.getRule().getName()); modify ($dt)

Re: [rules-dev] RFC: stream concept

2011-07-26 Thread Wolfgang Laun
On 26 July 2011 21:42, Edson Tirelli wrote: > >Hi all, > >As you all know, we use "entry-points" to represent streams in Drools, > but in fact, entry points are a much more general abstraction than just > streams. For instance, they create partitions in the RETE's alpha network, > they su

[rules-dev] i want to store the rules in the database, can someone help me ?

2011-07-26 Thread 祝英杰
When I use the drools, I want to store the rules in the SQL Server Database, Can someone help me and give me some advices, how do I do it? Thanks! ___ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-d

[rules-dev] Cannot open Guvnor GWT classes with GWT Designer

2011-07-26 Thread jreynolds1982
I am using Eclipse Helios (3.6) with a Maven plugin and Google Web Toolkit. When I try to use GWT Designer to view any classes in the Guvnor source, i get the following error: Any Suggestions would be GREATLY appreciated! java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: com.google.gdt.eclipse.designer.model.widgets.

Re: [rules-dev] 5.3

2011-07-26 Thread Kris Verlaenen
Edson Tirelli wrote: >Also, who is taking care of jbpm pull requests? There are 9 open > right now and they are there for quite some time... I've been handling > the pull requests for knowledge, core drools and integration, but not > sure who is taking care of all the other modules. Guilty a

Re: [rules-dev] RFC: declaration syntax

2011-07-26 Thread Edson Tirelli
Thanks for the feedback Michael, and you are right, it will replace the previous way of dealing with windows, but we will still support the old way for backward compatibility. The idea is to have this working in the engine for Beta1, so I will let you know as soon as the parser is done in th

Re: [rules-dev] RFC: declaration syntax

2011-07-26 Thread Michael Anstis
Personally, I don't see a problem with option 1. For consistency (with entry-points) the named windows and usage thereof should, IMO, be defined thus:- * * **declare window X @type( tumbling ) @keep( last 10 ) StockTick( symbol == "RHT" ) from entry-point Y end rule Z when StockTi

[rules-dev] RFC: stream concept

2011-07-26 Thread Edson Tirelli
Hi all, As you all know, we use "entry-points" to represent streams in Drools, but in fact, entry points are a much more general abstraction than just streams. For instance, they create partitions in the RETE's alpha network, they support all Rete concepts like truth maintenance, they share

[rules-dev] RFC: declaration syntax

2011-07-26 Thread Edson Tirelli
All, BACKGROUND: As Drools moves forward, we need to be able to declare several new structures, as well as make existing structures more robust for compile time analysis, error reporting and tooling support. For instance, as it is today, entry points are implicit declared by simply using the

Re: [rules-dev] 5.3

2011-07-26 Thread Edson Tirelli
Also, who is taking care of jbpm pull requests? There are 9 open right now and they are there for quite some time... I've been handling the pull requests for knowledge, core drools and integration, but not sure who is taking care of all the other modules. Edson 2011/7/26 Geoffrey De Smet

Re: [rules-dev] 5.3

2011-07-26 Thread Geoffrey De Smet
All, I 'll try to release 5.3.0.Beta1 directly from master, so please keep an eye on hudson. Current problem and who's looking into them: * droolsjbpm-integration: mark o https://hudson.jboss.org/jenkins/view/Drools%20jBPM/job/droolsjbpm-integration/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/

[rules-dev] 5.3

2011-07-26 Thread Mark Proctor
We are going to do a beta next week, followed by a candidate release a week or so after, and hopefully final after that. So 5.3 final three and a half weeks from now. We are trying for much shorter releases, with only a few small changes per release. Mark _