Re: [rules-dev] RFC: stream concept

On 27/07/2011 14:13, Edson Tirelli wrote: Hi Wolfgang, Thanks for the feedback. My comments. 2011/7/27 Wolfgang Laun > On 26 July 2011 21:42, Edson Tirelli mailto:ed.tire...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi all, As you all know, we use

Re: [rules-dev] RFC: declaration syntax

Hehehe, always good to have your help. As you will see the skip one and skip all tokens strategies are implemented. The "inject a token" and try again is not, as that is a lot more complicated to do it and maintain manually. Edson 2011/7/27 Wolfgang Laun > On 27 July 2011 15:34, Edson Tir

Re: [rules-dev] RFC: declaration syntax

On 27 July 2011 15:34, Edson Tirelli wrote: > >Just to explain how the parser recovers from errors, it tries to skip a > token that fail to match the construct being parsed. If that still fails, it > will skip all tokens until it finds the start of a top level construct (i.e. > a statement li

Re: [rules-dev] RFC: stream concept

On 27 July 2011 15:13, Edson Tirelli wrote: > >Hi Wolfgang, > >Thanks for the feedback. My comments. > > 2011/7/27 Wolfgang Laun > >> On 26 July 2011 21:42, Edson Tirelli wrote: >> >> >Drools (and most CEP products) do not enforce immutability because we > are dealing with "represen

Re: [rules-dev] RFC: declaration syntax

Just to explain how the parser recovers from errors, it tries to skip a token that fail to match the construct being parsed. If that still fails, it will skip all tokens until it finds the start of a top level construct (i.e. a statement like a rule, query, declare, etc) and resynch from there.

Re: [rules-dev] A major 5.2 letdown

I think Mark was playing with enums. If you don't mind submitting your test, we should add it to the codebase to prevent this regression in the future. At least it is fixed in HEAD and we should also check the fix was backported to 5.2.x branch. Thanks for reporting, Edson PS: I like th

Re: [rules-dev] RFC: stream concept

Hi Wolfgang, Thanks for the feedback. My comments. 2011/7/27 Wolfgang Laun > On 26 July 2011 21:42, Edson Tirelli wrote: > >> >>Hi all, >> >>As you all know, we use "entry-points" to represent streams in Drools, >> but in fact, entry points are a much more general abstraction tha

Re: [rules-dev] Cannot open Guvnor GWT classes with GWT Designer

On 27/07/2011 05:00, jreynolds1982 wrote: > I am using Eclipse Helios (3.6) with a Maven plugin and Google Web Toolkit. > When I try to use GWT Designer to view any classes in the Guvnor source, i > get the following error: > > Any Suggestions would be GREATLY appreciated! My understanding is GWT D

Re: [rules-dev] 5.3

On 27/07/2011 06:18, Wolfgang Laun wrote: So as not to hear (from Mark) again that "it is too late to fix this JIRA" - look at the long list of open JIRAs, */now/*! -W We'll fix what we can, and then rest will go into 5.4. IF we only have short period between releases, you'll never have long to