Re: [rules-dev] Regex bug in JDK 5

2010-12-25 Thread Wolfgang Laun
Oops, sorry. I already got one -- from Mark for missing this. But I did document the issue in the Jira and the code, so it should be clear to everybody. -W On 25 December 2010 13:06, Geoffrey De Smet wrote: > Nice :) Thanks for fixing. So JBRULES-2849 can be closed? > > Next time add the jira is

Re: [rules-dev] Regex bug in JDK 5

2010-12-25 Thread Geoffrey De Smet
Nice :) Thanks for fixing. So JBRULES-2849 can be closed? Next time add the jira issue id in the commit comment JBRULES-2849 that way the commit will be shown in the jira issue (once they enable git integration in jira) With kind regards / Met vriendelijke groeten, Geoffrey De Smet Op 25-12-10

[rules-dev] Regex bug in JDK 5

2010-12-25 Thread Wolfgang Laun
JDK 5 doesn't handle lookbehind assertions correctly if they contain alternatives. The fallout from this bug has been cleared up by my release https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm/commit/f3a50273c91ac697b6f1a0936ce96a44c3b38250 I have added comments to clarify the nature of the "strange" worka