Re: [rules-users] Web service deployment

2007-03-07 Thread Michael Neale
What app server are you using? Some app servers can have different scopes for classes loaded in different ways. I am not sure of all of them ;) On 3/8/07, Jones, Alan R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, my thoughts exactly -- the web service is packaged as an .aar which is nothing more than a j

[rules-users] problem in comparing two dynamic values inside

2007-03-07 Thread Sikkandar Nawabjan
Your logic in the condition is wrong. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Re: [rules-users] RE: Rules with Lookup Tables...

2007-03-07 Thread Edson Tirelli
I'm not sure I understood what you are trying to do, but syntax is more like: rule ... when // getting the codes from the table Code( $shCode : sh_code ) from lookupDAO.getLookupValues( "MILT.CUSTNO" ) // matching the objects if the code $gateIN : RKEM_Move( CUSTOMER_REFERENCE_NU

Re: [rules-users] 'from accumulate' doesn't work on multiple columns?..

2007-03-07 Thread Edson Tirelli
Vlad, Trying to answer both of your e-mails in this one. 1. Right now, accumulate supports only a single Pattern (column), as you already realized. That is a limitation we want to remove before the next final release, but it is not done yet. I already know how to fix that, but didn't had the

Re: [rules-users] Web service deployment

2007-03-07 Thread Burr Sutter
I've done this for JBossWS (not Axis) running on the JBoss AS. Let me know if you are interested in the example. Burr Michael Neale wrote: sounds like the classes that are visible to axis are not visible to rules - depends how you are packaging up your application - war or ear? On 3/7/07, *

Re: [rules-users] 'from accumulate' doesn't work on multiple columns?..

2007-03-07 Thread Mark Proctor
currently 'accumulate' only works on single column, eventually we hope to have it working with multipe patterns - but it's not in the near future road map. Unless a community member wants to work on the feature :) Mark Olenin, Vladimir (MOH) wrote: This is as a follow up for the previous ques

[rules-users] 'from accumulate' doesn't work on multiple columns?..

2007-03-07 Thread Olenin, Vladimir (MOH)
This is as a follow up for the previous question It looks like I made a wrong assumption that 'accumulate' can work on multiple columns: Integer ( intValue > 0) from accumulate ( Record ( f1 == $f1, f2 < 10, $value1 : value )

[rules-users] RE: Rules with Lookup Tables...

2007-03-07 Thread jdepaul
I have configured 3.1.0M1 on my local machine with the corresponding IDE... now I need help with the rule syntax. I have configured a DAO which will return an ArrayList of values representing a list of values from the lookup table - I tried this, but I'm having problems...: rule "GATE-IN Match

[rules-users] 'distinct' keyword?.... or an alternative... here is an example

2007-03-07 Thread Olenin, Vladimir (MOH)
Hi, I ran into the situation when I need the functionality similar to 'distinct' keyword from SQL, ie I have a set of facts: Record (f1 = 1, f2 = 1, value = 4) Record (f1 = 1, f2 = 2, value = 1) Record (f1 = 1, f2 = 13, value = 2) Record (f1 = 1, f2 = 14, value = 5) Record (f1 = 2, f2 =

Re: [rules-users] column binding vs field binding - any performance implications?

2007-03-07 Thread Marcus Ilgner
Hi Vlad, On 3/7/07, Olenin, Vladimir (MOH) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I wonder if there are any performance implications of choosing column binding vs field binding (I'll be using bound variable in eval). Eg, in such case: Record($field : field) eval ( $field.equals("xxx") ) vs

Re: [rules-users] column binding vs field binding - any performance implications?

2007-03-07 Thread Edson Tirelli
Vlad, No noticeable difference in binding fields or columns, but there are really negative perf impacts in using eval(). I'm writing a blog about it. Please try to avoid. I know bellow is just a sample, but it would be so much better if written: Record( field == "xxx" ) []s Edson Olenin,

[rules-users] column binding vs field binding - any performance implications?

2007-03-07 Thread Olenin, Vladimir (MOH)
Hi, I wonder if there are any performance implications of choosing column binding vs field binding (I'll be using bound variable in eval). Eg, in such case: Record($field : field) eval ( $field.equals("xxx") ) vs $r: Record() eval ( $r.field.equals("xxx") ) Does it start to

RE: [rules-users] Web service deployment

2007-03-07 Thread Jones, Alan R
Yes, my thoughts exactly -- the web service is packaged as an .aar which is nothing more than a jar file. The workaround that i have seen mentioned is to place the data object (Fact) inside a jar and place that into axis2\WEB-INF\lib. That only causes more headaches since everything is generated a

Re: [rules-users] DSL to DRL File Conversion - Is it possible ?

2007-03-07 Thread Mark Proctor
Its not straight forward but you can use the DRLDumper, one a PackageDescr, assuming it parses without errors: DrlParser parser = new DrlParser(); PackageDescr pkg = parser.parse( source, dsl ); final DrlDumper drlD

Re: [rules-users] DSL to DRL File Conversion - Is it possible ?

2007-03-07 Thread Michael Neale
no in 3.0 version unfortunately. You can tell the parser to print out the DRL - but it will just write it out the System.out (only for debuggin). Look in RuleParser for that option. In trunk - which will be the new version - there is a seperate step which outputs DRL - but I don't think that made