should already be done - mvel may be using the wrong one.
Can you tell me what class it is that gives the nosuchmethod? (ie what the
target class is) and we can make sure all references are to inlined one so
this won't happen again.
Michael.
On 4/27/07, Mark Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
actually I got that wrong. We already do change the namespace. The
problem is MVEL. MVEL uses reflection mode normally, but will use ASM if
its provided, so its MVEL that is having the problem.
Mark
Mark Proctor wrote:
For M2 I'll look at changing the namespace for ASM to avoid this
issue. Not
actually you can compare the pom.xml from the drools-compiler module to
confirm exactly what versions of janino it is using.
On 4/27/07, Michael Neale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hmmm ok I haven't seen that. I don't believe it changed at all. I am using
janino now with no problems.
On 4/24/07,
hmmm ok I haven't seen that. I don't believe it changed at all. I am using
janino now with no problems.
On 4/24/07, Ru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello rules-users and team!
I moved from 3.0.5 to 3.0.6 and got this error:
Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.NoSuchFieldError:
NO_D
all the jsr94 jars, I mean ;) (there is the drools one, plus the JSR one).
On 4/27/07, Michael Neale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
you need the drools-jsr94 jar in your classpath
On 4/25/07, fakhfakh ismail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello,
> when I exucute my code of rules an error is affiche
you need the drools-jsr94 jar in your classpath
On 4/25/07, fakhfakh ismail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hello,
when I exucute my code of rules an error is affiched
" Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/drools/jsr94/rules/RuleServiceProviderImpl "
however the pack
For M2 I'll look at changing the namespace for ASM to avoid this issue.
Not sure how you'll avoid the issue till then.
Mark
brad hadfield wrote:
Hi, I wonder if anyone could help me?
I'm attempting to use the 'from' keyword in the same fashion as the
sample found on the Release Notes/Languag
Hi, I wonder if anyone could help me?
I'm attempting to use the 'from' keyword in the same fashion as the
sample found on the Release Notes/Language Improvement wiki. The
example shows a piece of syntax that uses the 'from' keyword to obtain
data via a Hibernate query. i.e:
$r : Restaurant(
I suggest this is one for the JBoss Rules team to clarify.
Can they please provide a little more narrative as to the (expected)
operation of activation-group?
If your understanding is correct this sounds like a bug - a workaround
for which will be to have a "processed" flag on each Order and have
There are multiple orders with flowId == 1798. If I remove the
activation-group I believe that 2 orders are processed by the rule with
their specific stage as well as the last rule and any orders that don't
meet the stage criteria will trigger the last rule. Without the
activation-group all order
JIRA-749 relates to NPE's in
"org.drools.reteoo.RuleTerminalNode.retractTuple".
Whether this is related
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris West
Sent: 25 April 2007 14:25
To: Rules Users List
Do you have multiple Orders with a flowId == 1798?
What if you remove the activation-group (for testing) do multiple Orders
get processed (all be it, possibly, each one multiple times)?
If not it could point towards a problem with either the implementation
or understanding of activation-groups (f
12 matches
Mail list logo
