> Should we go to Jira to find what are the open issues?
>
> I have been fighthing one issue where drools doesnt seem to be
> evaluating all the constraints. I have two columns with the same class
> on both and around 8-9 joined constraints. Constraints 5+ are never
> evaluated (at least my class
Title: RE: [rules-users] variables in rules
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mark Proctor
Sent: Wed 15-Aug-07 6:54 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] variables in rules
there are no examples, but its straight forward, its no different
I have a rule:
SOLUTION 1
===
when
cntct: Contact(initialized==true)
rel: Relation(contact==cntct, active:active == $1)
then
…
end
For this to run, it requires the "Relation" object asserted into working memory;
so I'd have to forcefully assert (Relation
All,
This bug is already fixed:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1031
Fix will be included in 4.0.1, or you can use snapshot from here:
http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/artifacts/jboss-rules
[]s
Edson
2007/8/15, Arjun Dhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > Should we go to
Drools 4.0 GA was released last month.
Downloads:
http://labs.jboss.com/drools/downloads.html
Release Notes (available in several places):
http://blog.athico.com/2007/07/jboss-drools-40-released.html
Features and screenshots
http://labs.jboss.com/drools/featuresandscreenshots.html
Enhance
Yuri,
Right now, the only way is to work with different rule bases and working
memories. Even using agenda-groups or rule-flow, rules are still being
eagerly evaluated, as this is how standard Rete works.
The problem of creating and canceling too many activations is a known
problem and
There are others, not sure if they are all in jira, as several as MVEL
bugs, which is a separate project. We are trying ot make sure everything
is fixed for 4.0.1, but this is the reason for the delay in the release.
Mark
Edson Tirelli wrote:
All,
This bug is already fixed:
http://jir
Thank you, Edson. I saw that announcement. What is a "GA" release? Is it the final,
ready-for-prime-time version?
Scott
Edson Tirelli's message received 8/15/2007 7:53 AM:
Drools 4.0 GA was released last month.
Downloads:
http://labs.jboss.com/drools/downloads.html
Release Notes (avail
Yes, GA means General Availability that is the final version.
[]s
Edson
2007/8/15, Scott Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Thank you, Edson. I saw that announcement. What is a "GA" release? Is it
> the final,
> ready-for-prime-time version?
>Scott
>
> Edson Tirelli's message received 8
Hi,
I use a package builder to build rule packages loaded from a DB. Those
rules are written in a dsl so I use also a dsl file. But I'm looking for a
simply way to return the line number if there is a parsing error. In fact I
need something like DroolsError.getLine(). how can I do this
Thank'
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/find-the-error-line-number-in-a-rule-tf4273166.html#a12162223
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://list
Edson Tirelli post.com> writes:
> Yuri,Right now, the only way is to work with different rule bases and
working memories. Even using agenda-groups or rule-flow, rules are still being
eagerly evaluated, as this is how standard Rete works.
> The problem of creating and canceling too man
Edson Tirelli post.com> writes:
>All,This bug is already fixed:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1031 Fix will be included in 4.0.1,
or you can use snapshot from here:
Just an fyi: I got the latest snapshot and problem solved.
thanks,
___
Thanks for the update.
2007/8/15, Yuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Edson Tirelli post.com> writes:
>
> >All,This bug is already fixed:
> http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1031 Fix will be included in
> 4.0.1,
> or you can use snapshot from here:
>
> Just an fyi: I got the latest
That is a half-truth (if such thing exists...) :)
You will indeed avoid the beta evaluations (joins) that are more
expensive than alpha evaluations, and also prevent the rule activations. But
alpha evaluations will still happen. So, I would say, you would prevent
90%(?) of the engine work w
My rules engine test showed virtually no difference between Rete and
Sequential execution modes: 3.44s for Rete while 3.50s for Sequential.
Those are the average timing from several runs, each with 1,000 rule
execution calls. Since I do not have a controlled environment, the
difference seems insig
Thanks for your help, Edson.
collect works in my simple test now, but not when I integrate with my code.
Is there an easy way to debug LHS to see if collect stmt is evaluated? I
notice IllegalAccessError
since my app will load a selected list of jars upfront, so my questions are:
1) Can th
If the rules and data don't push the system then you won't see a huge
amount. As the rules and data grow in size, but we are talking 50K facts
and thousands of rules to see a 350% increase. I'm surprised a RuleBase
with a 1000 rules only sees a 2% increase though, while not large its
still at t
This is a regression bug. InitialFact should not be shadowed. Can you
please open a JIRA for that?
Thank you
Edson
2007/8/15, Anh Vuong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Thanks for your help, Edson.
> collect works in my simple test now, but not when I integrate with my
> code. Is there an ea
Also sequential is aimed for stateless services, it's rule building time
is a slighter longer. So Once the RuleBase is built try running the test
a few hundred times, once Sequential and once Rete. Also check memory,
it should use less memory. Its hard to get any real perf numbers in
3.44s. All
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1086 is created.
Edson Tirelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a regression bug. InitialFact should not be shadowed. Can you
please open a JIRA for that?
Thank you
Edson
2007/8/15, Anh Vuong < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:Thanks for yo
I just upgraded to Drools 4.0 and changed my assertObject calls to insert.
I also switched from WorkingMemory to StatefulSession. The rules seem to be
fine, but I am not able to retrieve any inserted objects from the working
memory for some reason. Here is what I'm doing. I'd appreciate any
sugg
22 matches
Mail list logo
