Yes, you are right. RPC is one possible solution, but we haven't worked with
seam rpc api yet so if somebode has a hit it would be great help. Another
solution would be to POST parameters into appropriate servlet but as long as
there is a GWT it is very hard to find out what parameters are passed
Ok so yes the error is on the brms web app. The agent will poll the
brms , so that may be causing it.
So, could you try to run the brms without the agent hitting it and see
if it happens ( will narrow it down massively)? Also, what tomcat, jdk
and I
Os version?
Sent from my iPhone
On 23/
Well, I'm pretty sure no agent hit the brms on my server last week, it's a
development server and I'm currently the only one using it, so the agent
wasn't instantiated (or perhaps I tried it once or twice at the beginning
of the week, to check that it worked, but that's all).
The tomcat versio
Hallo,
I was wondering if it's possible to create a rule that can only be
activated once. So if at a certain point the LHS is matching, it will be
fired and deactivated immediately, so the rule never ever gets fired for
the object it has updated, no matter if the LHS will matches after a few
You can write your own agenda-filter to keep track of which objects have
fired for which rules and cancel the activation if it's fired before.
You may also have some luck with lock-on-active.
Mark
Waruzjan Shahbazian wrote:
Hallo,
I was wondering if it's possible to create a rule that can onl
Hi,
We are using Drools 3.0.6 using a test-driven approach. This works
really well in allowing us to get good test coverage around our rules
and to create those rules rather easily. However, as the number of
tests grows, the execution speed of the test suite in our Continous
Integration envir
Henry Canterburry wrote:
Mark,
Thanks for the reply. My timeframe matches the one you mentioned
although I would naturally be looking for working and production ready
functionality. In the meantime, did any of the approaches I mentioned
make any sense or would you say that drools is not the r
Henry Canterburry wrote:
Mark, at this point I have a semi-working drools integration utilizing
the stateful session. With each event coming in, I insert the event
into the session and call fireAllRules. I have also added memory
managment rules to retract events past a certain time threshold or
Mark, at this point I have a semi-working drools integration utilizing
the stateful session. With each event coming in, I insert the event into
the session and call fireAllRules. I have also added memory managment
rules to retract events past a certain time threshold or number of
instances in m
if i have several levels of java beans, the Date is not working. example:
m:Message( first.second.date > "01-jan-2007" )
receive exceptions such as:
Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.String
at java.util.Date.compareTo(Date.java:112)
at
org.mvel.math.IEEEFloatingP
Were you compairing Date agaist string here, as your double quotes indicate?
Xiandong
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 23, 2008, at 17:33, jack wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
if i have several levels of java beans, the Date is not working. example:
m:Message( first.second.date > "01-jan-2007"
i copy the following from the Documentation. i thought it means that drools is
going to auto convert the string "27-Oct-2007" into a java Date object.
+
DateThe date format "dd-mmm-" is supported by default. You
can customize this by providing an alternative date format
Hi,
I used a list as global to retrieve all possible facts when applying the
rules.
Is this a good practice ?
If not how to get a bunch of facts that is true for my rules?
barath.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Is-globals-to-retrive-facts-after-rules--tp15058438p150584
13 matches
Mail list logo
