SB,
Came across this a while back. I *think* the quickest fix is to update
any Drools Jars (that exist *within* the Web / War insurance sample) and
make sure they are the same versions as that of the BRMS that you are using.
Paul
www.firstpartners.net/blog
SB.Raghavendra wrote:
Hi All,
I
Samir,
As Mark mentioned, we added several fixes to the 4.0.x branch (to be
released as 4.0.5) related to dynamic rules.
Can you please try it out? If it is still a problem, please open a JIRA
attaching your test case. I will look into it and fix it.
Thanks,
Edson
2008/3/3,
Hi All,
I'm having the following error while deserialing a workingmemory object:
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
com.oss.activation.rules.core.types.StepShadowProxy
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:200)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
Hi, I have a problem in the web interface drools-brms when I try to
compare two variables, one of them with null value. If I try to compare
with this situation, the system throws a nullPointerException, and I
can't do anything. If I assign a value to this variable, the system
works perfect.
Here is the exception:
Exception in thread mythread java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
com/daxtechnologies/optima/fault/eventprocessor/NewEvent
at ASMAccessorImpl_716163221204646531490.getValue(Unknown Source)
at org.mvel.ASTNode.getReducedValueAccelerated(ASTNode.java:174)
I tried building the jars using Maven but am getting exceptions cause some of
the tests are failing. Here's a snippet from the same.
Running org.drools.integrationtests.MultithreadTest
org.drools.RuntimeDroolsException: Exception executing predicate
org.drools.base
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
at
Hi,
Suppose I have a class Foo with integers a, b and c ( methods getA getB
and getC respectively ) and I Want to check if an object of Foo satisfies
a - (b + c) 0
Is this the best way I go about doing this ?
rule Foo check
when
Foo( varA : a , varB:b, varC:c )
eval(
Are you using contains operator to check a hashmap for the existence of
a value? contains should only be used with collections, not maps...
[]s
Edson
2008/3/4, Brian Trezise [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm getting a strange exception upon inserting an object into working
memory. Relevant
Pedro,
You need to use the same rulebase you used to create the working memory
to deserialize it, as well as use the latest version of 4.0.x branch. I
fixed this problem a few days ago.
IMPORTANT: we made an effort on improving/fixing serialization and
dynamic rules use cases in 4.0.5.
I tried using the jars from the 4.0.x branch after building them and that
still doesnt seem to change the outcome. I see that the package builder has
the rule added to it and the count of the rules from it is incremented.
public void testDynamicRules()
{
//Create a rule dynamically
Jai,
You can try:
rule Foo check with inline eval
when
Foo( eval( a - (b + c) 0 ) )
then
do actions
end
Or, what is better IMO:
rule Foo check with return value predicate
when
Foo( a ( b + c ) )
then
do actions
end
Hope it
Can you please provide an executable, self contained test case? I will
take a look.
[]s
Edson
2008/3/4, samirsss [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I tried using the jars from the 4.0.x branch after building them and that
still doesnt seem to change the outcome. I see that the package builder
has
Thanks Paul. After putting Jar files in the application lib
folder,application is executing properly
On 3/4/08, Paul Browne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SB,
Came across this a while back. I *think* the quickest fix is to update any
Drools Jars (that exist *within* the Web / War insurance
I am getting one exception as : No SuchMethod Exception session.startProcess
(Ljava.lang.String) when i executing the following code in one of the class
:
public static StatefulSession getSession() {
if ( rulebase == null ) {
rulebase = loadRuleBaseFromRuleAgent();
}
Hi,
I am using JBoss rules 3.0.6 to externalize all business rules. We have a
requirement were in we want to create a audit report after rules have been
executed. For each rule, we need to track Desired Condition Value(as
specified in when part), Actual Condition Value(value in asserted object)
Hi,
Is there a way to set the date while executing the rules? The effective dates
would be checked against this date instead of today's date. By default the
effective dates would be checked with System date. But in some cases we would
need to execute the rules in a 'back-dated' mode.
Use
16 matches
Mail list logo