Edson,
I am using 4.0.3 version.
In my code,
* For each thread new rule base and StatefulSession is created.
* Then why i am getting the previously mentioned exceptions(which i posted
in the first message) for fewthreads only while other works fine.
* Your suggestions please,
" 1 .
Thanks Michael, I simulate.. your rule fire with successful.
I discovered the problem. The object in property (like Foo in your
example), when null, it's not throws NullPointerException, but
"org.mvel.PropertyAccessException: unable to resolve property".
With that, I never imagined that the pro
Alessandro:
I wrote a test case and some classes around your example and mailed them to
you, I was not able to get them to post on this list for some reason.
Thanks...Michael
Alessandro Lazarotti wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi, Michael...
> The code that I wrote has a property "name" and n
Okay, I wrote a test case around the following and it works fine so let me
know if this isnt what you are working with...
Foo Class
public class Foo {
private String m_name;
public String getName()
{
return m_name;
}
public void setName(String n
Hi, Michael...
The code that I wrote has a property "name" and not "nome". Sorry, the
example not is the same that the Exception.
But ocurr the same error.
org.drools.RuntimeDroolsException: Exception executing predicate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caused by: org.mvel.CompileException: unable to resolv
According to your error it appears you had a typo somewhere. The error you
pasted in was looking for the property nome instead of name.
Alessandro Lazarotti wrote:
>
> If I've the simple classes:
>
> public class ObjectBar{ public String name; gets/sets}
>
> public class ObjectFoo{ public
If I've the simple classes:
public class ObjectBar{ public String name; gets/sets}
public class ObjectFoo{ public ObjectBar bar; gets/sets }
... and ObjectFoo this in WorkingMemory.
It's not possible navigate in objectFoo for make constraint in objectBar?
Example:
rule "Teste"
no-loop true
Ok Edson, it's working fine now!
Thanks
Alesssandro
Edson Tirelli escreveu:
Hi Alessandro, just saw your e-mail and answered to you, but
basically no-loop will not work for cases like this.
Either specify your constraints in a way they prevent the loop or
use lock-on-active.
rule
Steve,
Only way to do that today is through in-line eval().
Although it is quite easy to add such support to drools, in case you want
to help providing us a patch. Probably 3-4 hours work. Just a matter of
adding the operator support in this class:
http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbos
We've hit a situation where the business users would like to specifiy some
facts that have a range check (a 'between' type operation) on fixed length
strings, that are usually short (6 characters or less). Simple example -
given a range of 'ABC' to 'ABM', this range would match all the character
Christie, Blair wrote:
I am looking around for a course on jboss rules to take.
Is there any recommendations?
The is the JBoss Drools training course, which is two days. But I
wouldn't say it was advanced, it just teaches all the basic concepts. A
good Drools person should be able to do a on
I am looking around for a course on jboss rules to take.
Is there any recommendations?
Blair
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
made a silly mistake, sorry.
Christine
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Hi All,
I thought this:
public void retractFacts() {
Iterator iter = workingMemory.iterateFactHandles();
while (iter.hasNext()) {
FactHandle handle = iter.next();
workingMemory.retract(handle);
}
}
would retract all facts, but in fact I get a
Hi!
I know that this topic has been partially covered in this:
http://www.nabble.com/Initialize-Global-to13388685.html#a13388685
thread.
Nevertheless I think that the geiven answers are only partially satisfying.
Basically the main problem is still unsolved:
One has a global variable inside th
15 matches
Mail list logo
