Hi ,
In my employee table empcode already declared some value.
I want, update some new value in empcode it will reject with
response.empcode can not be updated.
like condition: empcode can not be updated.
Thanks,
Manya...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/can-not-be-
Wow, I thought about using a dsl, but it seemed that I would need define the
entire rule with the dsl. If I can mix the dsl and native rule language that
would be quite enjoyable.
Mark Proctor wrote:
>
> ...
> You can use DSLs for this already, ...
>
--
View this message in context:
http:/
Barry Kaplan wrote:
I have a set of rules that /all/ contain the following condition...
positionQuantityAllocatedToLegs :
Integer(intValue < position.quantity)
from accumulate( StrategyLeg(priority > 1, instrument == equity,
long
Hi,
I am migrating one of my projects to using the drools rule-flow. I have a
bunch of RuleFlowGroups and just 1 fact object (where I am iterating over an
external list and hence I execute the RuleFlow tens of thousands times,
inserting a new fact object for each element in my list). Each RuleFlow
I have a set of rules that /all/ contain the following condition...
positionQuantityAllocatedToLegs :
Integer(intValue < position.quantity)
from accumulate( StrategyLeg(priority > 1, instrument == equity,
longShort ==
LongShort.LON
Good point! Using an AgendaEventListener instead of logging every rule
in the RHS is the way to go.
Marcus Ilgner wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Jaroslaw Kijanowski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
May be you could store the names of every fired rule in a global by putting
drools.getRule()
Do not spam both user and dev mailing lists. This is a user question,
contain it there.
Details on how to better use the mailing lists are here
http://labs.jboss.org/drools/lists.html
Mark
siddhartha banik wrote:
Hi All,
I am using Drools Stateful session with serialized Rule Base & Working
i'll try to make a simple example and send it, currently i found a dirty hack.
Cheers
Markus
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Kris Verlaenen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> it seems the activation for the second node is not cancelled also i
>> do a retract in the rule
>
> The activation should hav
it seems the activation for the second node is not cancelled also i
do a retract in the rule
The activation should have been removed from the ruleflow group. I just
tested this with a small example and I do not seem to be able to reproduce
this error, the retracted object seems to have resulted
There was a question about Timestamp in my table.
Condtion is : compare to start_timestamp can not be less than or equal
Current Date.
i am trying to like this ,
EmployeEx(eval(startTimestamp.after(new
Timestamp(System.currentTimeMillis()
In This case No Rules to fired.Please review this c
Hi,
it may also help to have a look at the PetStore example.
Alexander Claus wrote:
I want to use rules which shall generate as a consequence a new java
object.
The GUI of my application shall display the new generated objekt.
but how can the GUI of my application get informed by the rule engi
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Alexander Claus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I want to use rules which shall generate as a consequence a new java
>> object.
>> The GUI of my application shall display the new generated objekt.
>> but how can the GUI of my application get informed by the rule
Thanks Alexander.
There was a question about Timestamp in my table.
Condtion is : compare to start_timestamp can not be less than or equal
Current Date.
i am trying to like this ,
EmployeEx(eval(startTimestamp.after(new
Timestamp(System.currentTimeMillis()
In This case No Rules to fired
I want to use rules which shall generate as a consequence a new java
object.
The GUI of my application shall display the new generated objekt.
but how can the GUI of my application get informed by the rule engine that
it has generated a new object (Warning)? And how the GUI or any other java
comp
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Jaroslaw Kijanowski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> May be you could store the names of every fired rule in a global by putting
> drools.getRule().getName() into a list on the RHS.
> Then you could get all rules in your package ( pkg.getRules() ) into another
> list a
Hi,
I want to use rules which shall generate as a consequence a new java object.
The GUI of my application shall display the new generated objekt.
but how can the GUI of my application get informed by the rule engine that
it has generated a new object (Warning)? And how the GUI or any other java
c
Ron Kneusel wrote:
Greetings!
I am attempting to run the HelloWorld example for Drools 4. I have Eclipse 3.3 setup on Windows with the Drools plugin. I have created a project with the Drools examples and added all the Drools .jar files to the project. Everything compiles. When I initially ra
Hi Thomas,
We're doing that in our project (we have different set of rules for
different internal processes), and we have one rule base and every time
we want to run the engine we execute:
statefulSession.startProcess("rule.flow.id");
statefulSession.clearAgenda();
May be you could store the names of every fired rule in a global by
putting drools.getRule().getName() into a list on the RHS.
Then you could get all rules in your package ( pkg.getRules() ) into
another list and "diff" both collections (another_list.removeAll(list) ).
Thalupula Ravi wrote:
Hi
I need to write some rule which will *only* fire on newly inserted data
points in Working Memory. Does Drools support any
such feature which will help me to achieve this ? Any suggestion, how can
I
achieve this efficiently?
I am inserting 6 matching DataObjects into Working Memory. Rule is
gett
20 matches
Mail list logo