drools newbie wrote:
Thanks Mark.
I looked the unit tests. I'm looking for something different
I would have different rules that compares varying fields(rather fixed set
of fields) and those are all defined in the database.
Ex:
1.Rule1 conditions are f1='a' & f2='b' in db
2. Rule2 conditions are
Thanks Mark.
I looked the unit tests. I'm looking for something different
I would have different rules that compares varying fields(rather fixed set
of fields) and those are all defined in the database.
Ex:
1.Rule1 conditions are f1='a' & f2='b' in db
2. Rule2 conditions are f3='c' or f4='d' in db
Hi,
in drl, is there a way to specify whether a rule should go into business rule
asset or tech rule asset after import? and what about category info(doesn't
look like you can specify that part of info in drl)?
thanks
Jeff
___
rules-users ma
drools newbie wrote:
Hello,
Actually I want to do the same way Sandeep has described.
1. Can someone please post some example to generate the drl from template?
Drools 5.0, which you can see in the M2 release, has drools-templates.
You'll need to look at the unit tests on how it works, but it
Sangrish wrote:
Hi
this question has been asked previously but it has been answered as "the
next major release will have backward chaining".
Drools Wiki doesn't mention backward chaining. So, does all of it mean that
Drools doesn't have backward chaining as of now?
It doesn't have it yet,
Hello,
Actually I want to do the same way Sandeep has described.
1. Can someone please post some example to generate the drl from template?
2.This thread is more than a 1 1/2 year old. Does drools have in-built
template concept now instead of using a template langauge such
velocity, freemarker o
Solved. See my follow up to "trouble dynamically changing packages of a
rulebase".
cb
Charles Binford wrote:
This is related to yesterday's post titled "trouble dynamically
changing packages of a rulebase".
I decided to try and reduce the problem down as much as possible so I
started with "
I believe I found my issue. It is related to this bug which was fixed
in 4.0.5.
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1329
Under eclipse I was running drools 4.07, but when running via cli I was
inadvertently using version 4.0.4 jar files.
cb
Charles Binford wrote:
I'm using 4.07.
So
Hi
this question has been asked previously but it has been answered as "the
next major release will have backward chaining".
Drools Wiki doesn't mention backward chaining. So, does all of it mean that
Drools doesn't have backward chaining as of now?
Thanks
Siddharth
--
View this message in
Hi Kris,
JSR-94 is not much of a standard, since it lacks any specification for
rule definition and a BOM (Business Object Model).
The best hope on the horizon for the ability to swap rule engines is
the Rule Interchange Format that the W3C is working on.
We recently completed a Blaze rep
Hi,
is there a way to listen to the package polling event? there are some
operations need to happen in our app each time the rule package is refreshed
from the server.
thanks
Jeff
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https
ups, i created a nice endless loop with my proposed solution. :-)
the correct (still ugly) solution is:
rule "fact1 should be smaller then 1"
when
$f : UserFact($fact1 : fact1 >= 1)
not IntConstraintOccurence(
ruleId == "fact1 should be smaller
This is related to yesterday's post titled "trouble dynamically changing
packages of a rulebase".
I decided to try and reduce the problem down as much as possible so I
started with "Hello World" program automatically created with Eclipse
when you create a new Drools Project.
I modified the p
Yes, my suggestion would need to use the access methods (e.g. getGEO())
but I don't know what their names are.
Otaduy del Paso, Zaloa [10/7/2008 12:38 PM] wrote:
Hi,
I have tried
OASISTSO10($e: EVENT)
EVENT($g: $e.GEO[0])
OASISTSO10($e.GE
thanks, you are right, that is kind of a solution. but not really what i am
looking for.
i am using drools-solver, and the "CreatedFact" is an
IntConstraintOccurrence, which i do not want to change.
maybe i should make the example more specific for my problem.
i have a rule, used for the solver:
Then use !GEO.isEmpty() as a condition.
--- On Tue, 10/7/08, Otaduy del Paso, Zaloa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Otaduy del Paso, Zaloa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: RV: [rules-users] Checking an xml field
> To: "Rules Users List"
> Date: Tuesday, October 7, 2008, 10:51 AM
> Scott,
>
Hi,
I have tried
OASISTSO10($e: EVENT)
EVENT($g: $e.GEO[0])
OASISTSO10($e.GEO[0].POSITION.LOCID matches "40.*")
It makes sense to me, since
OASISTSO10($e: EVENT)
OASISTSO10($e.GEO[0].POSITION.LOCID matches "40.
Hi Zaola,
I may not be right, but I can think of one solution :
when
OASISTSO10($e: EVENT)
EVENT($g: GEO)
OASISTSO10(eval($e.GEO.size >0), )
Then
Assert something
When
$e.GEO[0].POSITION.LOCID matches "40.*")
Then
I know that the JSR94 interface can consume a DRL file but can it start
with a precompiled package from BRMS or output of ant compilation? Can
we only consume compiled packages with the native drools API
(RuleAgent)?
My company is exploring replacing Blaze Advisor with the JBOSS Rules
engine.
Might be worth trying
OASISTSO10($e: EVENT)
EVENT($g: $e.GEO[0])
OASISTSO10($e.GEO[0].POSITION.LOCID matches
"40.*")
Barry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Otaduy del
Paso, Zaloa
Sent: Tuesday, October 0
Hello,
If you can change the code for CreatedFact and let it have a reference to
UserFact and change the rule to:
rule "fact = 1"
when
$f : UserFact(fact1 == 1);
then
insertLogical(new CreatedFact($f));
end
you will also have to overide equals and hashcode
Zaloa,
You haven't answered my question as what the problem is. Do these rules
compile?
It seems to me that you have misunderstood how the condition part of the
rules work.
I agree with David that it would help for you to study the manual some
more and to work through some of the tutorials.
Sin
Hi David,
Thanks for your helpful response. The problem was that the element GEO
can appear 0 or many times so what I needed to write was this
when
OASISTSO10($e: EVENT)
OASISTSO10($e.GEO[0].POSITION.LOCID == "40005")
Then
Hello,
I am a bit confused about how insertLogical() supposed to work in drools 5.
when i have a rule such as:
rule "fact = 1"
when
$f : UserFact(fact1 == 1);
then
insertLogical(new CreatedFact($f.getFact2()));
end
now i change $f in such a way, that the rule will fire
Read the manual man. Your rules don't make any sense
http://downloads.jboss.com/drools/docs/4.0.7.19894.GA/html_single/
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Scott Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the problem you are seeing? Do the rules compile ok?
>
> Otaduy del Paso, Zaloa [10/6/2008 12:
What is the problem you are seeing? Do the rules compile ok?
Otaduy del Paso, Zaloa [10/6/2008 12:08 PM] wrote:
Does anybody know the answer to my question? I'm not able to solve
this issue and don't find any clarifying tutorial either
Hi,
I'm new in drools and I'm having some pr
Foundations are there. Look at the javadoc for:
RuleBaseConfiguration.setMultithreadEvaluation()
RuleBaseConfiguration.setMaxThreads()
Consider it an early access version though, since I still want to add
more tests and make sure everything is round and ready to go into final.
[]s
It is definitively a bug then. Will take a look.
Edson
2008/10/7 Michal Bali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi Edson,
> Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> In the example I've mentioned there is already such import:
> import org.drools.StockTick;
>
> BTW, it is a unit test you've written :)
>
> I've al
Hi Edson,
Thanks for the quick reply.
In the example I've mentioned there is already such import:
import org.drools.StockTick;
BTW, it is a unit test you've written :)
I've also tried the fully qualified class name but it throws following
exception (this was tested with 5.0.0M2):
java.lang.NullP
I remember reading something somewhere a while ago about Drools 5 and
parallel rules execution...?
Is there any info available on this? Is it available in 5M2? When will it be
available? What are the features? Are the any docs now? etc...
Thanks!
/Magnus Heino
__
30 matches
Mail list logo
