Re: [rules-users] Re: drools 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT Maven repository broken?

2008-10-08 Thread tim tim
thanks geoffrey, i used the 2.4 version of the eclipse plugin. but now i changed it to use 2.5.1, and removed the explicit http://repo1.maven.org/maven2 repository but still no sources. maven is still searching in the wrong repositories: Downloading: http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/droo

[rules-users] Re: not exists / forall(not) logically equivalent, behave differently

2008-10-08 Thread tim tim
edson, thanks a lot for your answer. now i came to a new problem. i stated the rule as you said: rule "no dog without a tail" when $dog :Dog() not( Tail(dog == $dog) ) then // fire rule end but now, if i do workingMemory.insert(dog); work

[rules-users] Re: drools 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT Maven repository broken?

2008-10-08 Thread Geoffrey De Smet
With kind regards, Geoffrey De Smet tim tim schreef: hi when i am getting drools snapshot via "mvn eclipse:eclipse" the compiled drools jars are downloaded but the sources are not, although i have true defined as parameter in my pom.xml and the sources of the other libraries are downloaded

[rules-users] drools 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT Maven repository broken?

2008-10-08 Thread tim tim
hi when i am getting drools snapshot via "mvn eclipse:eclipse" the compiled drools jars are downloaded but the sources are not, although i have true defined as parameter in my pom.xml and the sources of the other libraries are downloaded correctly. when i use drools 4.0.7 those sources are downloa

Re: [rules-users] Writing rules using java from template

2008-10-08 Thread drools newbie
Thanks again Mark. If anyone had done this before, Please share your ideas. If not, drools experts, Please give me some idea how we can do this. Since I'm new to drools, I'm not sure where to start. I have short deadline. Thanks in advance. Mark Proctor wrote: > > drools newbie wrote: >> Than

[rules-users] Salience guarantee

2008-10-08 Thread Leonardo Figueiredo
Hi, Is it really guaranteed that an higher salience rule will fire before an lower one? Does anyone had any problem with that? The docs says: " The most visible one is "salience" or priority, in which case a user can specify that a certain rule has a higher priority (by giving it a higher number