RE: [rules-users] Drools 5 m4 in IRAD/Websphere

Take a look at Retroweaver (http://retroweaver.sourceforge.net/). It compiles Java 5 source to JRE 1.4 classes. I remember there being several open-source tools like this but I could not find them with a quick search. I have not used this myself but have plans to integrate it into my build scri

Re: [rules-users] doubt regarding FORALL and contains operator...

Regarding 1, it is the expected behavior, since there is no vehicle in the wm whose model is not "bmw". Regarding 2, probably a bug. Can you please open a JIRA with a test case? []s Edson 2009/2/3 Sudhir M > Hi ALL, > We are using drools 4.0.7 for one of our projects. We encou

Re: [rules-users] doubt regarding FORALL and contains operator...

Sudhir, As I said in my previous e-mail, in case 1, it is the expected behavior. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-order_logic If you want to ensure that there is at least one Vehicle AND for all Vehicles the model is bmw, write your rule as: when exists( Vehicle() ) forall( V

Re: [rules-users] Re: scheduled starting of a ruleflow-group / drools fusion docs

Thanks Edson. I think I follow you. In my example, I will always have the transaction timestamp. In the case of the batch transactions, I still get the transaction time, I just might get the data a few hours later. I should be good if I use the transaction time for @timestamp. Cool stuff. I st

[rules-users] Community Clinic

Sorry to be ignorant but what are the details about the planned February 4th Webinar? How to connect, etc.? Thanks. - Mike ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Re: [rules-users] upgrade Drools from 2.1 to 4.0.7

Hong-Qiang Gao wrote: I am new to Drools. Are there any documents that detail the upgrade from 2.1 to 3.0 or to 4.0.7? In the 4.0.7 documents, there are good descriptions of upgrading from 3.0 to 4.0.7 and also many examples. Is there any examples that use org.drools.decisiontable.parser.

Re: [rules-users] Community Clinic

J Michael Dean wrote: Sorry to be ignorant but what are the details about the planned February 4th Webinar? How to connect, etc.? Thanks. I think i'm gonna postpone this a week, as I would like to get the 5.0 candidate release out, prior to the clinic happening. I'll send out an official emai

[rules-users] Drools 4.0.7, Java 5 which mvel version should I use

Hello, I just started to use Enums in my rules and I got following Exception during execution of the rule (compilation of rules is OK) [...] Caused by: org.mvel.PropertyAccessException: unable to resolve property: unable to resolve token: MetaType.cover MetaType is an Enum... I know my error

RE: [rules-users] Nested Objects

Very good. I suppose if one writes a DRL there is also the possiblity of declaring a variable to represent one of the nestings? Robert Costello -Original Message- From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Sudhir M Sent:

[rules-users] Inserting collection of facts in rule Consequence

Hello, Is there way to insert all facts from collection (similar to session.execute(collection)) in the rule consequence ? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Inserting-collection-of-facts-in-rule-Consequence-tp21814308p21814308.html Sent from the drools - user mail

RE: [rules-users] Question about drools-server

Jing, I'm not sure where you would put a drl file, but I would suggest looking at the code. I've had success using Guvnor and exporting a package to the execution server, but not a drl by itself yet. Robert Costello -Original Message- From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.

RE: [rules-users] upgrade Drools from 2.1 to 4.0.7

Hi Ankit, Thanks for the advice. I will look into version 5.0. Regards, Hong From: Gupta, Ankit (Ankit) [mailto:gupt...@avaya.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 12:19 AM To: Rules Users List Cc: h...@scenpro.com Subject: RE: [rules-users] upgrade Drools from 2.1 to 4.0.7 Hi

Re: [rules-users] doubt regarding FORALL and contains operator...

Hi Edson, Thanks for a quick reply. Regarding the second second point I will open an issue in JIRA. Regarding the first one is that a bug as well? since I haven't assert any of the vehicle instances I suppose the rule shouldn't fire right? But the rule is firing always. Thanks, sudhir. On Tue

Re: [rules-users] Drools 4.0.7, Java 5 which mvel version should I use

1.3.9 will work. You may try 1.3.12, but I didn't tested it myself. []s Edson 2009/2/3 Gras, Patrick > Hello, > > I just started to use Enums in my rules and I got following Exception > during execution of the rule (compilation of rules is OK) > > […] > Caused by: org.mvel.PropertyAcc

RE: [rules-users] operator choices in GUVNOR for decision tables

Here's my solution for this. I added a model with some Lists List stringList = Arrays.asList("Moe", "Larry", "Curly", "Edson", "Mark"); List intList = Arrays.asList(1,2,3,4,5,6,7); And was able to add a condition using 'contains'. Next step... see if there is a way for me to add an 'or' o

[rules-users] Re: [rules-dev] Drools Community Clinic Feb 4th 5PM GMT

I'm gonna cancel this for this week, I want to get the Drools 5.0 candidate release out before we do the clinic. So lets try for next week, I'll keep everyone posted. Mark Mark Proctor wrote: I'm going to try an informal experiment for the 4th of February at 5PM GMT (Date/Time subject to chang

RE: [rules-users] operator choices in GUVNOR for decision tables

I spoke too soon. I was hoping to refer to the Person.name in the RHS, but it appears that is not an option. Can anyone point me to the code where I can begin to add the 'in' operator for the web-based rule table? I'll gladly share my solution. Best regards, Robert Costello -Origina