Hi garrett,
If there are issues with persistence in a specific setting, we will try
to help you as much as possible. Any improvements are more than
welcome. Comments inline below.
Quoting Garrett Conaty garr...@conaty.net:
Specifically: In SingleSessionCommandService
a) the constructor
After digging through the source code I realized that in the Test Scenario
you can assign previously created instance to complex type using = prefix.
So if you created object instance engineInstance, you can assign this
instance to a car object instance using engine: =engineInstance (without
the
Hi,
I have a scenario where I want three approval levels for a particular
request.
Like for eg.
For the first time , a user login in and create a request, then we will
invoke a workflow process in which we have 3 approvals to
approve the request. At first time mail will be send to 1st approver
I'm building an application that will over time record changes in a certain
component (not at any set interval, could occur any time). The component can
possibly be uniquely identified via some kind of id. Is there a way that
when I insert an event / fact recording a change of state in this
I'm trying to have a rule execute based on the following condition:
ObligationComplianceEvent(term == term 1, obligation ==
obligation 1, level == 1)
ObligationComplianceEvent(term == term 2, obligation ==
obligation 1, level == 1)
I pass in two facts of type
Can anyone comment on my questions? If you need any more information please let
me know.
Thanks
Vijay
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Vijay K Pandey
Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2009 2:52 PM
To:
Just stick with standard inference mode, until you reach a problem
(which is unlikely), you only gain any real performance benefit from
sequantiel mode for large numbers of facts and rules. Unless you rule
authors have a problem deal with inference mode, then obviously you need
to just use
Doesn't seem to be a problem. See attached project.
--- On Mon, 8/17/09, Justin King justin.matthew.k...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Justin King justin.matthew.k...@gmail.com
Subject: [rules-users] when condition on multiple facts of the same type
To: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
You need some comparable property in the singleton object that's monotonically
increasing. Then you can have a rule like the following that must be of higher
salience than the rules you want to protect from duplicate singletons. i.e.:
rule EnforceOneSingleton
when
