You can find a new "Verify" button when editing rules. This button makes use
of drools-verifier, which may be used to perform what you are trying to do.
We are working hard these days to add field and fact restrictions to guvnor.
You can check these links for more help:
ilesteban.wordpress.com/2010
2010/4/16 Edson Tirelli
>
>Yes, Wolfgang is right. Just don't use ; inside the modify block:
>
>
I never had a problem with a semicolon at the end of the list of method
calls.
-W
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists
r u sure ur log contains no more error or warningsplz check
this may also b'coz of the organizationalentity table not having the
user with the name u provided in actor id
-
Keep Working >>
KiranP
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Drools-Flow-Another-problem-with-Hu
Premkumar Stephen wrote:
>
> Currently, the validate functionality ensures that rules have proper
> syntax.
> it is possible to extend this functionality so that business use cases
> might
> also be validated? Is there an API/examples to do that.
>
I am also interested in having business logi
@Kris
Do you have any tips for this? Am I interpreting your AbstractWorkItem
implementation for exception handling correctly.
Anybody else is very welcome to comment as well.
Thanks,
Nick.
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/How-to-do-Exception-Handling-tp689387p725237.html
I don't follow this line in the rule:
instance_1_Track : Track($var_1_aou : aouAsFloat != null &&
$var_3_platform_ptr : platform != null )
Should it be the following?
instance_1_Track : Track($var_1_aou : aouAsFloat != null ,
$var_3_platform_ptr : platform != null )
--
View this message in c
Hi;
I am trying to debug a situation in which a rule fires when it should not.
The rule is:
rule "DTR2_AOU_Mapping"
when
when
instance_0_Contact : Contact($var_0_guid : guid != null )
instance_1_Track : Track($var_1_aou : aouAsFloat != null &&
$var_3_platform_ptr : platf
and the content field?
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:10 PM, HMandic wrote:
>
> It wasn't that, I had the comment field filled.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n3.nabble.com/Drools-Flow-Another-problem-with-Human-Task-tp724086p724877.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list arch
It wasn't that, I had the comment field filled.
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Drools-Flow-Another-problem-with-Human-Task-tp724086p724877.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users maili
you need to set a comment value for your task and this will work fine.
there is an open issue for it in the jira check it out.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:19 PM, HMandic wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need some help here.
>
> I have a simple process with one human task. That human task work item has
> all t
Esteban,
That worked just as we wanted. Thank you very much!
Regards,
Luiz Eduardo
2010/4/14 Esteban Aliverti
> The runtime type of the objects returned by KnowledgePackageImp.getRules()
> is org.drools.definitions.rule.impl.RuleImpl. RuleImpl implements
> org.drools.definition.rule.Rule and c
Hi,
I need some help here.
I have a simple process with one human task. That human task work item has
all the necessary fields filled (actorid, id, name, etc.). When I start that
process it gets to that human task and fills everything it needs in the
database (Postgres) through hibernate. Up un
Thanks guys. Another lesson learnt!
_
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Edson Tirelli
Sent: 16 April 2010 14:39
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Fwd: Double Handling
Yes, Wolfgang is right. Just do
Yes, Wolfgang is right. Just don't use ; inside the modify block:
modify( $d ) {
preset( $i )
}
Edson
2010/4/16 Wolfgang Laun
> Well, I already suggested to you that the Drools Engine must be
> *informed*about changes to facts if these changes should trigger any rules.
>
> In rule "
Hi Rudolf,
In Drools Flow you don't need to deploy your processes into a Database.
We have drools guvnor to store our process definitions. Then you can
configure Drools Flow to use a database to maintain the runtime status of
your business processes.
Greetings!
2010/4/16 rudolf michael
> Hello t
Hello there,
After installing Drools and playing around with the KnowledgeBase and
sessions, i was able to do a proof of concept to act as a Workflow Engine.
It seems this is a good engine with lots of features included.
I am still a newbie, what i couldnt find though is the Drools flow/xml
defini
Well, I already suggested to you that the Drools Engine must be
*informed*about changes to facts if these changes should trigger any
rules.
In rule "Preset" you have
$d.preset($i);
but this must be written as
modify( $d ){
preset( $i );
}
-W
2010/4/16 Ade Timi
> Changing the
Changing the method name solved the build error problem.
But now I'm having my initial number comparison problem. I am using a rule
flow that runs preset 1st and then customer details. It is acting weird in
that it never runs customer details with the cpointer == 2 condition. It
only runs it when
Hi,
If your class extends CachedMoveFactory, the drools planner will call your
move factory only once at start.
But if it extends AbstractMoveFactory, the drools planner will be call at
each step
Samuel
CSC • This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient,
please delete witho
roud...@gmail.com
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Thanks for the fix.
Steve
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Resuming-Flow-NPE-when-completing-a-work-item-tp716847p723392.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users
21 matches
Mail list logo
