Hi,
if I had known the -DskipTests flag, because if you leave this away (as in
the doc) you get errors. I removed the tests by hand and then it worked.
So, I am currious if you leave the skipTests-flag away if it works.
Cheers, Rob.
Am 16.04.2010, 02:21 Uhr, schrieb Esteban Aliverti
Thanks for the fix.
Steve
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Resuming-Flow-NPE-when-completing-a-work-item-tp716847p723392.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
roud...@gmail.com
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Hi,
If your class extends CachedMoveFactory, the drools planner will call your
move factory only once at start.
But if it extends AbstractMoveFactory, the drools planner will be call at
each step
Samuel
CSC • This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient,
please delete
Changing the method name solved the build error problem.
But now I'm having my initial number comparison problem. I am using a rule
flow that runs preset 1st and then customer details. It is acting weird in
that it never runs customer details with the cpointer == 2 condition. It
only runs it
Well, I already suggested to you that the Drools Engine must be
*informed*about changes to facts if these changes should trigger any
rules.
In rule Preset you have
$d.preset($i);
but this must be written as
modify( $d ){
preset( $i );
}
-W
2010/4/16 Ade Timi
Hello there,
After installing Drools and playing around with the KnowledgeBase and
sessions, i was able to do a proof of concept to act as a Workflow Engine.
It seems this is a good engine with lots of features included.
I am still a newbie, what i couldnt find though is the Drools flow/xml
Hi Rudolf,
In Drools Flow you don't need to deploy your processes into a Database.
We have drools guvnor to store our process definitions. Then you can
configure Drools Flow to use a database to maintain the runtime status of
your business processes.
Greetings!
2010/4/16 rudolf michael
Yes, Wolfgang is right. Just don't use ; inside the modify block:
modify( $d ) {
preset( $i )
}
Edson
2010/4/16 Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.l...@gmail.com
Well, I already suggested to you that the Drools Engine must be
*informed*about changes to facts if these changes should trigger
Thanks guys. Another lesson learnt!
_
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Edson Tirelli
Sent: 16 April 2010 14:39
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Fwd: Double Handling
Yes, Wolfgang is right. Just
Hi,
I need some help here.
I have a simple process with one human task. That human task work item has
all the necessary fields filled (actorid, id, name, etc.). When I start that
process it gets to that human task and fills everything it needs in the
database (Postgres) through hibernate. Up
Esteban,
That worked just as we wanted. Thank you very much!
Regards,
Luiz Eduardo
2010/4/14 Esteban Aliverti esteban.alive...@gmail.com
The runtime type of the objects returned by KnowledgePackageImp.getRules()
is org.drools.definitions.rule.impl.RuleImpl. RuleImpl implements
It wasn't that, I had the comment field filled.
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Drools-Flow-Another-problem-with-Human-Task-tp724086p724877.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users
and the content field?
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:10 PM, HMandic trbu...@net.hr wrote:
It wasn't that, I had the comment field filled.
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Drools-Flow-Another-problem-with-Human-Task-tp724086p724877.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing
Hi;
I am trying to debug a situation in which a rule fires when it should not.
The rule is:
rule DTR2_AOU_Mapping
when
when
instance_0_Contact : Contact($var_0_guid : guid != null )
instance_1_Track : Track($var_1_aou : aouAsFloat != null
$var_3_platform_ptr : platform
I don't follow this line in the rule:
instance_1_Track : Track($var_1_aou : aouAsFloat != null
$var_3_platform_ptr : platform != null )
Should it be the following?
instance_1_Track : Track($var_1_aou : aouAsFloat != null ,
$var_3_platform_ptr : platform != null )
--
View this message in
@Kris
Do you have any tips for this? Am I interpreting your AbstractWorkItem
implementation for exception handling correctly.
Anybody else is very welcome to comment as well.
Thanks,
Nick.
--
View this message in context:
Premkumar Stephen wrote:
Currently, the validate functionality ensures that rules have proper
syntax.
it is possible to extend this functionality so that business use cases
might
also be validated? Is there an API/examples to do that.
I am also interested in having business logic
r u sure ur log contains no more error or warningsplz check
this may also b'coz of the organizationalentity table not having the
user with the name u provided in actor id
-
Keep Working
KiranP
--
View this message in context:
2010/4/16 Edson Tirelli ed.tire...@gmail.com
Yes, Wolfgang is right. Just don't use ; inside the modify block:
I never had a problem with a semicolon at the end of the list of method
calls.
-W
___
rules-users mailing list
20 matches
Mail list logo
