I have just completed an intra-company report, part of which researches the
usability of rule based systems for data validation, and the bottom line is:
yes.
There are some variations in rule authoring that might be useful or not,
such as using a domain specific language, or rule templates.
The t
We have recently started using flow along with rules. We noticed that for our
split constraints, those constraints often matched the LHS of our rules. We
took the approach of removing the constraint from the rule, under the premise
that we would only need to have the constraint one place, and no
Greetings,
Is there anyway to define the value of a variable defined as a ListDataType
in a ruleflow file? I have a custom WorkItem that can be configured with a
list of possible values that will complete it, and I'd like to define it in
the ruleflow file. However, any time I define it with anyt
In general, I meet that for resolve the topic of multithreading it's
required to implement another thread over a work item.
How does the asynchronic task can modified a variable of Knowledgebase?
Can you give me an example?
Pedro Buitrago
___
rules-us
Hello,
I am new to Drools (1 day of reading and watching video podcasts etc...). We
have a requirement for our project where we'll have an input table HSQLDB table
and some validation rules we need to apply on the data in the table. Some
tables will have > 45 000 records or more. Would this ki
Maxime (previous poster on the chain) works with me. We're still cutting our
teeth as well. We're hoping to find the same thing and do a Hello World
project.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:31 PM, AervTerrh [via Drools - Java Rules Engine]
> wrote:
> I keep having problems with OSGi Drools aswell. Ca
Sorry, I didn't see that you are using it.
Can you show us how your WorkModel class looks like?
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Mauricio Salatino wrote:
> the completeWorkItem method receives a Map with the results. You need to
> populate that map, in order the mapping works.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr
the completeWorkItem method receives a Map with the results. You need to
populate that map, in order the mapping works.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:22 PM, PAYET, Manuel
wrote:
> Hello everyone, I have a problem using result mapping in custom workitems
> when I try to set an attribute of an object
I keep having problems with OSGi Drools aswell. Can anyone send me a project
example with imports etc.? That would be most helpful.
King regards
Aerv
2010/4/21 jflamy
>
> The jars in the "bin" zip are themselves bundles. You need those as well.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n3
This is related to the problem in your other e-mail and it is fixed in
trunk.
Edson
2010/4/21 Piotr Jedrychowski
> Hello.
>
> I have a problem with such scenario:
>
> 1) add one knowledge package (sensor200) with two rules:
>
> package sensor200
> rule "Sensor-200-ON"
> when
> (and f0: FM
I fixed a couple problems with rule removal in trunk. Can you check if
trunk works for you?
Edson
2010/4/21 Piotr Jedrychowski
> Hello.
>
> I have a problem with removing knowledge packages. During running this
> source code
> Collection knowledgePackages =
> knowledgeBase.getKnowledgePac
Hello everyone, I have a problem using result mapping in custom workitems when
I try to set an attribute of an object as one of the result:
I make the following mapping in Result Mapping of my workitem:
Parameter Variable
message workmodel.message
and all I have is
Could not find va
The jars in the "bin" zip are themselves bundles. You need those as well.
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/Drools-Expert-5-OSGi-tp681546p740613.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users m
No, at the moment you can only use constant parameters for temporal
restrictions.
Edson
2010/4/21 Ana Villa
>
> Mostrar forma romanizada
> It is possible to parameterize the temporary restrictions fussion drools?
> For example use expressions like "this after [*, $object.getTimer ()]
> $
Hello.
I have a problem with such scenario:
1) add one knowledge package (sensor200) with two rules:
package sensor200
rule "Sensor-200-ON"
when
(and f0: FMSensorFact(id==201) f1: FMSensorFact(id==202) )
(not FMFact(id==200))
then
FMFact factToInsert = new FMFact(200);
insert(factToInsert);
end
Hello.
I have a problem with removing knowledge packages. During running this
source code
Collection knowledgePackages =
knowledgeBase.getKnowledgePackages();
if (knowledgePackages != null) {
List packageNames = new ArrayList();
for (KnowledgePackage singlePackage : knowledgePackages)
Hi,
Is it possible to set some kind of RUN-ONLY-ONCE restriction on a
sub-process in a rule flow, to avoid running this process multiple times in
the case of a cycle in the rule-flow?
-Ade
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jbos
Hello
I use two status in Drools Guvnor : "draft" and "validated". When I export
my rules, I only want to export validated rules.
Is it a way to activate by default a selector which exports only validated
rules ?
Sincerely
Jean-Denis
--
View this message in context:
http://n3.nabble.com/App
Mostrar forma romanizada
It is possible to parameterize the temporary restrictions fussion drools? For
example use expressions like "this after [*, $object.getTimer ()] $event"
In my sample project does not work ...
Thanks
___
rules-users mailing list
r
Hi Geoffrey,
I couldn't find the example code you mentioned but based on your description
I added the following lines after the planner was called:
ruleEnginePlanner.solve();
CustomSolution bestSolution = (CustomSolution)
ruleEnginePlanner.getBestSolution();
rule
Thanks a lot Esteban.
I've found this morning the same class that you mentionned:
- JackrabbitRepositoryConfigurator
- and StateItem where the state is declared
I'm going to modify the source code (these two classes exactly) and I will
include them in my Drools guvnor war.
Thanks for your help
I was digging the source code a little and I found that the repo is
initialized with default data
by JackrabbitRepositoryConfigurator.setupRulesRepository() inside
drools-repository module. Unfortunately, there is no way to hook custom
behavior there.
You can always modify the source code, but you
Try this one:
ldaps://localhost:16636
ssl
cn=DirManager,dc=kijanowski,dc=eu
admin123
ou=People,o=guvnor,dc=kijanowski,dc=eu
(uid={0})
ou=Roles,o=guvnor,dc=kijanowski,dc=eu
(member={1})
cn
-1
ONELEVEL_SCOPE
When you have followed the tutorial, then you have setup ssl, so please
keep in mind
Thanks Esteban for your answer.
I agree with you, this solution is a little bit awful. :)
When the repository is installed for the first time, the status Draft is
available. So in my mind, this status may be contained in the WAR and not
just in the repository.
What do you think about this?
I rea
24 matches
Mail list logo