I tried the latest one on tomcat.. drools-camel-server-5.2.0M2.war
To get things to work to some extent, I had to do this -
1. change the rsServer address from "/rest" to "/kservice/rest" in
camel-server.xml
2. change the route from "direct://kservice" to "direct://kservice/rest"
camel-client.x
Template parsing and expansion doesn't care much about the text between the
overall delimiting keywords; basically it is just a macro processor. This
means that you could very well expand a template containing DSLR rules, and
feed the result as DSLR to the Builder.
Notice that template expansion c
Hi mark ,
Currently i am doing like that
I am changing the drl file at runtime .
I get all the Objects from memory into one collection , and reinsert that
with new session .
but i am facing two problems :
1- First problem is that it will refire for already fired Object
2- if my fact class i
On 2011/5/19 20:58, Steve Reeves wrote:
> Hi Jervis - I did attach a screenshot for IE8 and IE7 that show up in the
> Nabble view - currently, it says "Post not accepted by mailing list" on it,
> so let me know if you can't see it.
I am afraid I can not see it. You can attache the screenshot to thi
Thank you. I will read up more about templates. Do you know if it is possible
to use a DSL with templates?
Thanks Again!
From: manstis [via Drools] [ml-node+2961816-1038471448-401...@n3.nabble.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 11:24 AM
To: Matias Klein
S
What if I only have a couple hundred rules that each examine 100-200 codes
each, and I also have a server with 256 GB of RAM? Is Drools a suitable
solution for me?
From: drdaveg [via Drools] [ml-node+2962646-565963607-401...@n3.nabble.com]
Sent: Thursday,
In Guvnor 5.1 I have several rules that invoke services defined as globals.
Rules that invoke methods on these globals run OK when deployed, but a test
scenario that triggers such a rule gets an exception.
For example, with a global named "logger" a rule that has in its THEN clause:
It appears that in order to be used in a Guvnor test scenario, an class must
have a public no-argument constructor. Is this true? And if so, is there a
workaround for classes that have a private constructor (other than changing the
object model)?
_
Your approach overall may also be a mistake. I've built DROOLS systems
looking at things like codes for thousands of entries. If you have a
problem with thousands of rules that examine codes your JVM will run out of
memory.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/DSL-
This would appear a (near) perfect use-case for "Templates".
Have a read of the documentation and examples, it should become quite clear
thereafter :)
On 19 May 2011 15:46, matiasklein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a DSLR that reads:
>
> There is an event with a code of "93000"
>
> This translates vi
Hi,
I have a DSLR that reads:
There is an event with a code of "93000"
This translates via DSL to:
[when]There is an event with a code {Code}=$event : Event(Code == {Code})
Unfortunately, I have to build many rules that are exactly the same as this,
but with different qualifying codes (i.e. ru
What about storing an instance of KnowledgeAgent in Application/Session
Context of you application? I mean, drools doesn't have any registry where
you can register stuff. Another solution could be to have a singleton class
holding the agent instance.
Best Regards,
Thanks, Esteban. I'm going to need to do some testing. I'll post back my
findings...
-- Jamie
From: Esteban [via Drools]
[mailto:ml-node+2961373-771292982-397...@n3.nabble.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 9:41 AM
To: Jamie Shaw
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Effec
I'm not sure how the rete is modified and if the modifications are
synchronized with any ongoing operation.
If you want to make sure that the rete is modified when your application is
in a "safe-point", then you will need to turn off ResourceChangeMonitor
service and call its scan() method manually
You can find the latest snapshots here:
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/view/Drools%20jBPM/job/droolsjbpm-integration/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/droolsjbpm-integration-distribution/target/
because they are snapshot you should update to 5.3.0-SNAPSHOT, or wait until
the 5.2.0 release is published
Hi Jervis - I did attach a screenshot for IE8 and IE7 that show up in the
Nabble view - currently, it says "Post not accepted by mailing list" on it,
so let me know if you can't see it.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Problems-with-Drools-5-2-0-M1-an
Where can I find the war file download ? is it packed in one of the downloads
under "Drools 5.2.0.M2 Downloads" on http://www.jboss.org/drools/downloads ?
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Maurici
On 19/05/2011 07:32, saurabh maheshwari wrote:
HI ,
I want to change rules dynamically , but not want to retract the
objects from memory.
I am using one fact class which is also created dynamically.
is it possible to do this ?
Please help me.
yes
Thanks ,
saurabh
_
2011/5/19 Abhay B. Chaware
> Correct. But does it then internally build the DRL into binary/compiled
> format and then uses it for updating knowledge base ?
>
>
>
Yes - Builder's output is always the same.
-W
> --
>
> *From:* rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [
int nFired = kSession.fireAllRules( 1 );
boolean success = nFired == 1;
-W
2011/5/19 Martin, Matthias
> Hello,
>
>
>
> in our project we’ve to know, which rules have already been checked,
> regardless whether or not the rule gets activated and hence put on the
> agenda. Is there any possibility
20 matches
Mail list logo
