See inline.
On 27 May 2011 20:19, jstroup wrote:
> Hi Droolers,
>
> Regarding this blurb from the 5.2 DSL reference:
>
>
> [snip]
>
> Given this DSL (test_expander.dsl)
>
> [when](C|c)heese is "{type}"=Cheese(type=="{type}")
> [when](is|hails|comes) from {country}=Cheese(country=="{country}")
The same place as any attribute, like Salience, Agenda-Group etc
Section "5.1.4.2. Keywords" in Drools Expert 5.1.1's documents talks about
it a bit.
Cheers,
Mike
On 27 May 2011 22:02, mmcintosh wrote:
> Thanks for your response. I have not seen any example of this. Where does
> the
> ruleFlo
Thanks for your response. I have not seen any example of this. Where does the
ruleFlow-group attribute go on the spreadsheet?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Decision-Tables-with-Business-Rule-Tasks-tp2990517p2994420.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing
I got this test case to work with Drools 5.1.1 - but I think the latest 5.2
distribution has an issue with date comparision.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/drools-date-compare-not-working-as-documented-tp2994330p2994394.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mai
You can add the "ruleflow-group" Attribute to the XLS form, or in Guvnor
using the guided editor.
Decision Tables compile to a common form that KnowledgeBuilder uses to
create your "engine"; so AFAIK using them in a flow should not be a problem.
With kind regards,
Mike
On 26 May 2011 22:03, mmc
hi -
i am using drools-distribution-5.2.0.M2. Here is the drl i am using -
--
dialect "mvel"
import com.deltadental.drools.sample.*
rule "Rule 01"
when
$underageCustomer : Customer(dob>"15-May-1993")
$order : Order(customerId == $underageCustomer.customerId)
eval($order.di
Correction: I meant the DSL Parser - Not the Guvnor DSL Editor. But the UI
could politely ask the user what alternative IS viable since it has access
to all of them.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Catch-22-ANTLR-DSL-matching-issue-tp2993923p2993959.html
Sent fr
Hi John, this is a known issue
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2718. The fix is in 5.2.0.CR1
which you can get from http://www.jboss.org/drools/downloads.html.
Thanks.
On 5/27/11 12:14 PM, John Peterson wrote:
I'm having some difficulty getting a rule flow with a stateless
session to w
Hi Droolers,
Regarding this blurb from the 5.2 DSL reference:
"It is important to note that the compiler transforms DSL rule files line by
line. In the above example, all the text after "Something is " to the end of
the line is captured as the replacement value for "{colour}", and this is
used
Greg, your guess is correct! The process instance is in fact persisted in db
for the period waiting for response in node 2.
Guys from dev-team, do you agree that this is a bug and should be filled in
Jira?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Flow-5-1-Updati
I'm having some difficulty getting a rule flow with a stateless session to
work. Essentially, it is just executing the first task and then stops. I'm
using Drools 5.1.1 and I just built the sample Drools by creating a new Drools
Project.
My rule flow is simple: Start-RuleGroup1-RuleGroup2-End
Hi,
I am trying to do some drools calls on startup of application
server(Websphere) and the server gets hung at a point and shows the
following warnings.
Any pointers or help appreciated.
[5/26/11 17:28:02:977 EDT] 0020 ThreadMonitor W WSVR0605W: Thread
"SoapConnectorThreadPool : 1" (
On 27 May 2011 16:24, jstroup wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The 5.2 docs list the following example DSL entry
>
> [when][][Tt]here is an? {entity:\w+}=${entity!lc}: ${entity!ucfirst} ()
>
> Oops, there is a spurious '$', the second one. It should be
=${entity!lc}: {entity!ucfirst} ()
> and say the fo
Although not an expert on Flow, I can say that there can hardly be anything
fundamentally wrong with this brief Flow, where a simpler solution might be
equally possible. Much depends on other circumstances, e.g., possible future
developments, deployment, workload,...
-W
On 27 May 2011 14:18, sdi
Hi,
The 5.2 docs list the following example DSL entry
[when][][Tt]here is an? {entity:\w+}=${entity!lc}: ${entity!ucfirst} ()
and say the following about what follows the equals sign
"The remaining part of the line after the delimiting equal sign is the
replacement text for any DSLR text matc
Get them while they are hot.
http://blog.athico.com/2011/05/releases-drools-expert-fusion-planner.html
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-u
Awesome! This worked
Thank you very much Wolfgang!!
Though, I have a architectural question
My use case is in "claims processing" and here are the steps that need to
happen
1) Recieve patients claim (prescription claim, like medicines)
2) Retrieve the patients Claim History (use patient ID in clai
hi,
it's a long shot and by far should not be treated as something
definite (i haven't checked the source code), but i suspect that
you've just found another bug in JPA/persistence implementation.
I agree with salaboy that once process has been updated only
new proc
hi,
sorry but i've never tried to use something else. My application uses
spring so there was no other option for me.
On 25/05/2011 20:16, anton.litvinenko wrote:
> Greg, were you able to achieve process persistence in other configurations?
> (e.g. without spring?)
>
> I don't use drools-spring
hi,
I'm not sure if its possible to achieve it as you might get e.g.
missing method/missing class exception if you start mixing different
versions of hibernate artifacts.
I'm afraid that the only safe solution would be running your
workflow process in its own JVM. Yo
20 matches
Mail list logo
