Re: [rules-users] Package snapshots in Guvnor have wrong list of rules

2011-09-30 Thread Vincent LEGENDRE
Because it is done like that : - Do the compilation, by filtering assets given to a package builder, and store the corresponding KB as a binary object - Then, but only then, create the snapshot, by copying all resources to a 'snapshot' part of repo So the compilation and snapshot actions ar

Re: [rules-users] Drools 5 PseudoClock with StatelessKnowledgeSession

2011-09-30 Thread Edson Tirelli
I think there might be a conceptual problem here. Stateless sessions are supposed to take a snapshot of facts (and/or events) and run all rules for them and dispose the session. Since it is a snapshot, there is no concept of time flow during the execution and so it can only run in the equivalent

Re: [rules-users] Memory leak in 5.2/5.3

2011-09-30 Thread Jamie
I recently ran into this issue and I've confirmed through testing that Drools 5.3.0.CR1 in conjunction with JBPM 5.1.1 Final fixes the problem. We're currently rolling our JVMs nightly to prevent out of memory errors, so I need to deploy this upgrade to production ASAP. Can anyone tell me what th

Re: [rules-users] Memory leak in 5.2/5.3

2011-09-30 Thread Michael Anstis
I believe early next week, unless something critical arises. Mark Proctor will have the final say. sent on the move On 30 Sep 2011 18:55, "Jamie" wrote: > I recently ran into this issue and I've confirmed through testing that Drools > 5.3.0.CR1 in conjunction with JBPM 5.1.1 Final fixes the prob

Re: [rules-users] Changeset does not monitor folder correctly

2011-09-30 Thread Wendy Mungovan
Thanks that did it! From: lhorton To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 6:33 PM Subject: Re: [rules-users] Changeset does not monitor folder correctly I wrote a small test for loading your drl files with different change sets, and bot

Re: [rules-users] Memory leak in 5.2/5.3

2011-09-30 Thread vadlam
as suggested in his post by Thomas , we are retracting the facts from memory. we are doing it in the finally block to make sure a rule session exception does not leave the facts in memory . for ex, we came across an incorrect regular expression syntax within the rules when using incorrect syntax

[rules-users] running Test scenarios in Guvnor 5.2.0.CR1 causes a memory leak

2011-09-30 Thread vadlam
Hi, running tests scenarios in Guvnor 5.2.0.Cr1 seems to be causing memory leak eventually. since the StatefulKnowledgeSession or the related class seems to have similar kind of leak in 5.2.0.Cr1, could it be that the same issue is causing the leak within Guvnor as well ? we tried to upgrade to

Re: [rules-users] running Test scenarios in Guvnor 5.2.0.CR1 causes a memory leak

2011-09-30 Thread Michael Anstis
You are correct, the decision table model changed between 5.1 and 5.2.0.Final. You can load 5.1 tables into 5.2.0.Final but the model changed between pre-release 5.2.0.CR1 and 5.2.0.Final to support CEP functions. Guvnor uses Drools Expert to run tests and therefore problems in Expert will affect

Re: [rules-users] Guvnor and Axis2

2011-09-30 Thread jliu
On 2011/9/29 15:46, Mario Viertel wrote: > Hi, > > I am using an own web service (Axis2; tomcat 6) to interact with Guvnor. > All drools related jars (drools*, mvel*, knowledge-api) are contained > in the lib folder of service's aar file. Via knowledge-api the service > interacts with the guvnor re