I got "unread data block" error while try to read the remote Guvnor package.
remote guvnor access ok, drl file ok, package building ok. but while trying
to build the knowledge base (add tokbuilder) I got this error.
Thanks in advance,
-
with kind regards,
--
View this message in context:
h
Hi
Is it possible to call function defined in .drl file from ruleflow (*.rf).
I already see possibility of static importing of functions defined in java
classes from *.rf level. However it seems that importing won't work for
*.drl defined functions.
I am using Drools 5.1.1
--
View this messa
That works. Although adding > to every line in the DRL not using the DSL may
be annoying, my hope is that if we are going to be using DSLs we would write
most if not all our conditions and consequences there and then construct the
rules from them(allowing some of our more business type people to wr
Hi,
I am not entirely sure about 5.3, but you certainly could escape pure DRL
phrases during DSL and DSLR parsing in V5.1. It would surprise me if they
threw that out.
You could escape a DRL line by using 'greater than' >
Regards,
Frank
gboro54 wrote
>
> That is what I thought... I was hopin
How would this play with Fusion?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-3-DSL-and-DRL-tp3524786p3525102.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-us
That is what I thought... I was hoping we would be able to write a rule using
a combination of our DSL and rule syntx
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-3-DSL-and-DRL-tp3524786p3525087.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.co
Take a look at using RuleFlow-Group. All you need to do is to create the
ruleflow diagram in eclipse (or using a text editor), then load this into your
rules. For each group of rules, assign the ruleflow-group name for each group.
So in your case, your ruleflow might be: (this is for 5 groups
One file for DRL, one file for DSLR - that's the way to do it.
-W
On 21 November 2011 14:55, gboro54 wrote:
> Do you have to declare your DRL as a DSLR resource to use a DRL? I ask
> because I would like to be able to use a combination of DSL with regular
> rule language(i.e mix and match). When
Do you have to declare your DRL as a DSLR resource to use a DRL? I ask
because I would like to be able to use a combination of DSL with regular
rule language(i.e mix and match). When I try to compile the rules as a DSLR
I can't use drools syntax but if I do a regular DRL I can't use the DSL
I a
Hi All,
I defined Declarative model, Bank with fields( name, accntno, balance,
deposit) in com.simple package in Guvnor-5.2,
and also defined one Guided rule and one test scenario and tested
successfully in Guvnor.
But when I am trying to use same Declarative model(Bank) through API's in
Ecli
drools-server is just an example of how to use drools in camel end-points.
If you look how the example defines WS and RS end points, it's the same but
just specifing a different data feed, i.e. file instead of WS/RS.
There is also some documentation on using camel here:
http://docs.jboss.org/drool
Hi,
we're refactoring a standalone application (Spring 3.0.5, Drool 5.1.1) to
use Apache Camel 2.8.0. As seen in other post, there is very little
information available about (
http://downloads.jboss.com/drools/docs/5.1.1.34858.FINAL/drools-integration/html/index.html
Drools Endpoint or Camel i
12 matches
Mail list logo