knowledgeBase is updated buy DefaultKnowledgeAgentEventListener , but it is
not impacting the knowledgeSession.
May i need to update knowledgesession manually or defaultListener does
itslelf.
Thanks,
Saurabh
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Facing-proble
Hi Jiri Svitak,
My changeSet.xml contents are:
http://drools.org/drools-5.0/change-set";
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xs:schemaLocation="http://drools.org/drools-5.0/change-set
http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/labs/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-api/
On 27/03/2012 03:01, Zeke wrote:
Whether the comparison is precarious or not should depend on how you
handle the literal. If you handle 99.9 as BigDecimal("99.9") which
precision can be controlled, you can trust the comparison.
Anyway, since it has different behavior for these two cases, it sh
Whether the comparison is precarious or not should depend on how you handle
the literal. If you handle 99.9 as BigDecimal("99.9") which precision can
be controlled, you can trust the comparison.
Anyway, since it has different behavior for these two cases, it should be a
bug, right? I just want to
Hi,
Just migrated from Guvnor 5.1.1 to Guvnor 5.3.0 on Tomcat 6.0.29. Everything
went fine, except when I logint to my account I get this error message:
400 javax.jcr.nodetype.ConstraintViolationException: no matching property
definition found for {http://www.jboss.org/drools-repository/1.0}works
My team is using Drools on a government project. As is usually the case
with government projects, the security folks have their hands in every
aspect of the project. They have big questions on MVEL, but I'm going to
try to boil them down to one simple question:
At what stage(s) of Drools's lifecyc
Two other ways to achieve what's wanted:
(1) Retract the fact on the RHS of the matching rule.
(2) Add a boolean attribute a to the fact, add a constraint a == false
and modify the fact on the RHS of the matching rule, setting a to true.
-W
On 26 March 2012 15:58, FrankVhh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To
So, probably there is something related on how those resources are loaded
or how the jar files are scanned when they are loaded.
This doesn't means that drools doesn't work.. probably is a bug and you
should report it if you can create an isolated test with the error inside
Jira.
Cheers
2012/3/26
With Java 7, when I run a bundle with Drools (in Apache Felix), I get this
exception:
*org.drools.RuntimeDroolsException: Unable to load dialect*
*
'org.drools.rule.builder.dialect.java.JavaDialectConfiguration:java:org.drools.rule.builder.dialect.java.JavaDialectConfiguration'
*
I had this probl
What do you mean with "doesn't work well"? which problem are you
experiencing?
2012/3/26 elMateo
> Hi all,
>
> the problem is that Drools doesn't work well with Java 1.7.0
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:21 PM, jjmartinez wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have, again, this exception:
>>
>> org.drool
Hi all,
the problem is that Drools doesn't work well with Java 1.7.0
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:21 PM, jjmartinez wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have, again, this exception:
>
> org.drools.RuntimeDroolsException: Unable to load dialect
> 'org.drools.rule.build
>
> er.dialect.java.JavaDialectConfigura
Hi,
To my knowledge, conflict resolvers are only used to determine priority of
rule activations. It does not prevent rules from firing.
You should be able to get the behavior you want by adding activation-groups.
In an activation group, only one rule can fire. See documentation.
Regards,
Frank
Hello all,
I have, again, this exception:
org.drools.RuntimeDroolsException: Unable to load dialect
'org.drools.rule.build
er.dialect.java.JavaDialectConfiguration:java:org.drools.rule.builder.dialect.ja
va.JavaDialectConfiguration'
but I have a file in META-INFcalled drools.packagebuilder.conf
4.0.7 is rather old. 5.1.1 and later do not exhibit this behaviour.
However, it should be noted that comparing double values using == is a
precarious approach. For instance, 99.9 (the mathematical number)
cannot be represented as a double machine number. Hence, you do not
truly test for
equality w
I was using an incorrect version of Guvnor, thanks for your help.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-Repository-Configuration-not-available-under-Administration-tp3851863p3857750.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
Hi, guys:
I am using Drools 4.0.7. I find a strange behavior. When my LHS is
"Message( varDouble == 99.9 )" and "varDouble" equals "new Double(99.9)",
the condition is true. But when my LHS is "Message( types.doubleType ==
99.9 )" and the "doubleType" field is also equal to "new Double(99.9)", th
16 matches
Mail list logo
