Hi,
There is no way to do this in Guvnor right now. You can use custom rules with
Verifier outside of Guvnor. You can even make the custom rules with Guvnor.
What is missing is the ability to use the rules in Guvnor for the Source -
Verify.
This has been on the wish list for some time, but
Hi Cristiano, I think you may have a configuration issue between Guvnor
and Designer. Please read chapter
http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v5.2/userguide/ch10.html#d0e3136 in the docs
and make sure that both your Guvnor and Designer are configured to be
able to see eachother correctly..if this still
On 5/17/12 7:36 AM, Tihomir Surdilovic wrote:
Hi Cristiano, I think you may have a configuration issue between Guvnor
and Designer. Please read chapter
http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v5.2/userguide/ch10.html#d0e3136 in the docs
and make sure that both your Guvnor and Designer are configured to be
Hi Tihomir,
I read the docs, and I don't think that I got out of the standard this
time. At least this time I can create and save the diagrams and change
the color theme properly...
Guvnor is reached here:
http://localhost:8080/drools-guvnor/org.drools.guvnor.Guvnor/Guvnor.jsp?#
And
Hi!
I'm trying to build Guvnor from source. I have followed instructions listed
here:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-build-bootstrap/blob/master/README.md
I am able to start the application. After clicking on URL in Development
Mode tab, Guvnor app starts to load but after a few
Thanks, I'll listen to your advice and switch to downloading binary asset
content.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-REST-API-and-XLS-decision-tables-tp3985574p3999138.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I can't seem to find this on the site and know I have done it - how do you
wrap a node name in a ruleflow or BPMN graph so it displays on multiple
lines?
I would like This is a really long process name that I would like to be be
wrapped on multiple lines
to appear as
This is a really long
Not sure why your server log has:
01:10:03,075 ERROR
[org.jbpm.designer.web.server.JbpmServiceRepositoryServlet]
(http--127.0.0.1-8080-1) Could not find the package for uuid:
c3142f2a-084b-423f-8afa-640c84140075
Designer scans all Guvnor packages trying to find the one the UUID
belongs to.
I just updated to Drools 5.4 and I am not getting the following error on all
my map accessors:
10:41:12,997 ERROR [stderr] (Thread-169) Exception in thread Thread-169
java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception jitting: feeKeys[1] == null
10:41:12,998 ERROR [stderr] (Thread-169)at
rule Rule1 trade
no-loop true
when
$tsc:TradeSideContext(trade!=null,primarySide!=null,contraSide!=null)
$trade:Trade($tradeDate:tradeDate, tradeSource == O) from
$tsc.trade
$ps:TradeSide(capacity.capacityCode ==
It looks like the rule executes(based on my unit test the proper element is
placed in the list) and it always seems to happen on the my last execution.
In addition I have noticed that the evaluations seem to be handled on other
threads. Is this correct behavior?
gboro54 wrote
rule Rule1
In Drools 5.4 we added an optimization that JITs constraints (i.e. compile
them in bytecode) after they have been evaluated for a given amount of times
(currently 20). Moreover it is not true that constraints' evaluations is
made in threads different from the main one. Instead it is that jitting
Joe,
you might also consider adding your own rule to one of the existing
verifyer DRL files. I think they are part of some .jar file, so all
you'd need to do is de-jar, edit, re-jar, or just fiddle with class
path if that's the way the verifiy locates the DRL resources.
-W
On 17/05/2012, Toni
Mario,
That is what i expected(just wanted to verify). Let me know if any
additional information is needed...
Mario Fusco wrote
In Drools 5.4 we added an optimization that JITs constraints (i.e. compile
them in bytecode) after they have been evaluated for a given amount of
times
Ok, I've been able to reproduce your issue. I'll fix it asap and keep you
updated on how I am progressing.
The only (ugly) workaround I could find at the moment is to replace
feeKeys[1] with feeKeys[new Integer(1)].
Let me know if it works for you.
Mario
--
View this message in context:
Thanks Mario! That seems to have resolved the issue. I look forward to your
fix.
Mario Fusco wrote
Ok, I've been able to reproduce your issue. I'll fix it asap and keep you
updated on how I am progressing.
The only (ugly) workaround I could find at the moment is to replace
feeKeys[1] with
I have reported this issue here: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3511
I have also already fixed it and pushed the fix on the master branch.
Working on the fix I also found another workaround: even replacing
feeKeys[1] with feeKeys[1+0] should work. I don't know if this is better or
worse
Thanks for reporting this, I'll double check and fix it as soon as possible
Best
Davide
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-traits-don-more-than-3-pojos-got-IllegalArgumentException-tp3788670p3999543.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list
I am using the StartProcessCommand through the BatchExecution interface, and
it works fine, but I don't see any return information in the
ExecutionResults, such as a ProcessInstanceId or ProcessState? Is there
some way to acquire this information. I see a number of other Commands in
the process
Hi Herm,
You can use the out identifier to get some result..
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Hrumph herman.p...@imail.org wrote:
I am using the StartProcessCommand through the BatchExecution interface,
and
it works fine, but I don't see any return information in the
ExecutionResults, such
What would one call with the outIdentifier to get a result?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/ProcessInstance-from-StartProcessCommand-tp383p4000166.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
21 matches
Mail list logo
