Do you mean this:
global ProgramRuleValidationLog progRuleValidationLog;
function boolean logging(String actualValue, String ruleValue) {
progRuleValidationLog.setActualValue(actualValue);
//...
}
with the message "progRuleValidationLog cannot be resolved"?
This is due to a restriction
Javadoc: Subclasses of LinkageError indicate that a class has some
dependency on another class; however, the latter class has
incompatibly changed after the compilation of the former class.
Looks like some incompatibility between your development and
deployment environment.
Did you truncate any h
On 16/08/2012, Mark Proctor wrote:
>
>> +1 to split up the user lists per drools subproject (drools, guvnor,
>> planner). It would reduce and focus the volume of each list.
> We can look into this for drools 6.0. Because the "guvnor" name, and what it
> is, will probably undergo an overhaul.
Guv
Has anyone tried to set up Guvnor in a clustered configuration, i.e. using
more than one instance of Guvnor for high availability? Does it involve
setting up a clustered Jackrabbit repository?
Thanks,
Jason
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-clustering-t
Is there a way to specify enumeration values or functions for variables in
DSL definition?
Thanks,
Jason
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Specify-enumeration-for-DSL-variables-tp4019228.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Can @{KeyName} be annotated with the associated enumeration type? This may be
easier than trying to parse the DRL and make determination of the correct
type of @{KeyName}. I found the ability to use DRL in decision table is very
helpful and it is just a couple things like this that prevent this fea
Greetings All!
I humbly request your guidance and insights!
Overview:
We are currently undergoing evaluation of how to best proceed using the
Drools Suite to best meet the current and future business needs with the
highest system scalability and performance. We are attempting to make the
proper s
My best advice on that is to go through the jBPM docs first as that
should answer I think most of your questions and then come back with
specific stuff: http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v5.3/userguide/.
Thanks.
On 8/16/12 6:18 PM, Sadiroveski wrote:
> Yes Tihomir, I got your idea and I like it i.e. us
Thanks for your help guys,
I will do some search on how can generate Model to Drool Language and return
to you.
Regards,
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Does-Drools-expert-accepts-XML-files-tp4019033p4019224.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list
Yes Tihomir, I got your idea and I like it i.e. using the path as a variable.
It seems that I need a Web service to put the file in Sharepoint along with
the path.
Just another question Tihomir, I want to put the information in the form
entered by a user into a database (MyDatabase) and not the JB
Hi,
We're in the process of moving our web apps from Java 5 to Java 7 and
Drools 3 to Drools 5.4.0. Our rule base is compiled and serialized to
the db by one app, and read from the db and fired by another.
Everything went fine during testing, but when we tried to switch to
production we got this
I was having the same trouble until I caught this item in the release notes:
> *4.1.5. Eclipse plugin*
> 4.1.5.1. Breakpoints in Rule RHS are not working with Java dialect
>
> Debugging with Java is not working. Debugging with MVEL is not affected.
> This will be fixed in the future releases bef
Hi,
Unfortunately it is not possible to associate a data-type with a @{key}
field at present.
In order to do so we'd need to parse the DRL text to determine the
Fact\Field to which the key relates (if indeed any). This is a significant
enhancement.
Being able to set a default value for BRL Fragm
On 16 Aug 2012, at 10:02, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
> My thoughts:
> -1 to private: Keep it public - default to open :)
If it's public and open, all that will happen is noobs will send emails there,
because they they think they will get better answers. Which will defeat the
point.
I guess we ca
You are right - use @{keyname} does work! Is there way to attach enumeration
values to the column when it is constructed this way? It seems the guided
decision table is not able to associate any defined enumerations to the
@{keyname}.
Regarding boolean checkbox for BRL Fragments, I understand the
Hi,
If you add a BRL Fragment column and add "Free form drl" to that you can
use the @{keyname} notation (I just tried and it works fine).
BTW, it was a design decision to have a boolean checkbox for BRL Fragments
that contain no template keys. The thought being a user might not want the
fragment
This is a known limitation: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1799
With kind regards,
Mike
On 16 August 2012 16:55, jasonxzhong wrote:
> I am trying to figure out how to use DSL terms in BRL fragment to
> construct a
> column in a guided decision table.
>
> I have the following definition
BTW, to clarify this is a Guvnor enhancement.
I assume you was meaning Guvnor ("...Create New -> New Rule Template").
Drools Expert Templates can already be used with different data-sets.
On 16 August 2012 20:44, Michael Anstis wrote:
> No this is not possible.
>
> Separating Template from Dat
No this is not possible.
Separating Template from Data though would make a good feature.
I've raised a JIRA for it here: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1929
With kind regards,
Mike
On 16 August 2012 18:08, dunnlow wrote:
> I have template data that has several attributes per row. I
Hi, jBPM runtime supports attachments, however this is not available in
the console yet.
If you use console you could try to implement logic in your form which
submits a chosen file to your document management system (you could even
use flash if you want :) ) and then use the path/url of this do
ok but why is it not able to find my function written and why is it not able
to find my global variable with it's name given.
Please help me fix this global variable thing. Rest I will look into it
later.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/modify-and-up
On 16/08/2012, Rana wrote:
> ok so what is the flow of the failed condition of the rule.
There is no "flow" for a rule not firing because one or more of its
conditions aren't met. Only recently I've suggested on this list a way
of determining why a rule does not fire. It requires a detailed,
ind
ok so what is the flow of the failed condition of the rule. Also you did not
answer the first question of the function. It is not able to find my
function in the rule file.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/modify-and-update-is-not-working-in-the-rule-file-tp40
The cancellation of an activation and the ensuing call to
activationCancelled() is NOT sufficient as an indication of the rule
not matching your fact data.
Scenario 1:
- fact(s) inserted
- activation created from rule R1
- fireAllRules
- activation of rule R1 fired
Scenario 2:
- fa
I have written a function
function boolean logging(String actualValue, String ruleValue) {
progRuleValidationLog.setActualValue(actualValue); //this is a pojo
which
will give me what are the failed rules.
progRuleValidationLog.setRuleValue(ruleValue);
return true;
}
ru
I have template data that has several attributes per row. I would like to
have several rules that use the same template data. When I do a "Create New
-> New Rule Template" I only see the ability to use a single rule against
that data. Can I add a rule? (Obviously, I want to avoid having many
du
On 16/08/2012, Rana wrote:
> How can I fire one rule file if I have lot of rule files defined in my
> change
> set. Right now I have written an if-else condition and checking if the
> input
> is Androgel then fire Angrogel rule fire.
But a rule (as you have it) with
Drug( brandName == "AndroGe
I am trying to figure out how to use DSL terms in BRL fragment to construct a
column in a guided decision table.
I have the following definition in DSL
[condition][] Registration data has properties = RuleData()
[condition][] - {expression}{value} = {expression}{value}
In a guided decision tabl
Hello,
I am using Drools generated form to build my application forms with JBPM. In
a specific user task inside my process, I want to let the user add a file
via an upload button. So the question is:
- How can we do this in the Task form and in the task properties in the
designer?
- Does the file
How can I fire one rule file if I have lot of rule files defined in my change
set. Right now I have written an if-else condition and checking if the input
is Androgel then fire Angrogel rule fire.
But how can I do that in real time.
Also I have a requirement which says it needs the reason why the
Something like
kSession.getAgenda().getAgendaGroup( "AndroGel" ).setFocus();
With the way the rules are written an agenda-group doesn't appear to
be required at all, but who knows.
-W
On 16/08/2012, Esteban Aliverti wrote:
> One last thing. Just like Wolfgang said: if you don't activate the
Thanks. This will work if I have more than more than 1 conditions or actions.
And is there a way to reference the in free form DRL? I tried
@{keyname} and it does not seem to work.
- Jason
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Hiding-a-column-in-web-guided-dec
One last thing. Just like Wolfgang said: if you don't activate the
agenda-group where the rule is defined its activations are never going to
be executed.
Best Regards,
Esteban Aliverti
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:29
By the way, what are you trying to do in this piece of code?
Collection objs = workingMemory.getObjects();
Iterator it = objs.iterator();
while (it.hasNext()) {
Object obj = it.next();
if (obj instanceof Program) {
FactHa
The project doesn't compile since the parent pom is missing. You don't
event have the Drug and Program classes in it!
Best Regards,
Esteban Aliverti
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Rana wrote:
> Please find the
Please find the project attached. Please check and help me out. I am now like
cat on that wall. The project team needs it and this is giving me hard time.
Please help
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4019196/pi-affiliate-drools-rule-engine.zip
pi-affiliate-drools-rule-engine.zip
Please
Thanks a lot W. That worked like a charm. Just one more twist to the same issue
.
Along with the total score for the certifications i also want to take a count
of those certifications where the user scores are greater than the required
scores for those certifications.
I believe i won't be
If you insert facts that have a chance to match, and if you
enable genda-group "AndroGel" then I see no reason why
it should not work.
-W
On 16/08/2012, Rana wrote:
> Hi this is my rule file, can you help me modify to make it work please.
>
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4019187/Rule
Yes this is something community is asking for and we are looking into
right now. If you want to join us on IRC ( http://www.jboss.org/jbpm/irc
) and I'd be glad to talk to you about this in more details too if it is
something you would like to for example work on and help with :)
Thanks
On 8/
This is the log I get, it is not able to set the values at all. I even try to
update in the code. but still there is no data that I am setting in rule is
set at all.
0[main] INFO com.drfirst.pi.affiliate.drools.DroolsKnowledgeObject -
Drools Resource Scanner is set to 60 seconds
6[main
This is a bug.
Note that the equivalent rule
package datelist;
rule "Sample rule"
when
CurrentDate( $now: now )
$obj: MyObject( ## $obj memberOf $list,
myDate == null || myDate after[5d] $now )
MyObjectList( $list: myObjectList contains $obj )
then
System.out.p
Thanks Mike.
Though the problem remains, atleast I know I will have to find a workaround
and not struggle with excel uploads.
Regards
Tanu
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Excel-Upload-of-decision-table-resulting-in-incomplete-rules-tp4019178p4019188.html
Se
Hi this is my rule file, can you help me modify to make it work please.
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4019187/Rule.txt Rule.txt
Please let me know
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/modify-and-update-is-not-working-in-the-rule-file-tp4019158
Oops!
This is a typo when creating the example I mentioned in my previous message.
Here is the correct rule syntax (the $list variable is bound from
MyObjectList.myObjectList, which is of type java.util.List):
rule "Sample rule"
when
CurrentDate( $now: now )
MyObjectList( $lis
On 16/08/2012, Paulo Reis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your answer. Yes, Object was just a example, maybe I've used a
> bad one.
> I will try to invoke update to see whether it get modified. Could you tell
> me a little bit more about "superSetOf" ? How do I use it or where do I get
> more info abo
For the operations "a contains b" and "b memberOf a", operand a must
be a Collection or array; your MyObjectList is neither.
5.3.0 had less strict compile time checks; 5.4.0 fixed this.
I am surprised that this ever executed correctly. Did it really, with
the rule and classes exactly as shown?
-
Hi,
Thanks for your answer. Yes, Object was just a example, maybe I've used a bad
one.
I will try to invoke update to see whether it get modified. Could you tell me a
little bit more about "superSetOf" ? How do I use it or where do I get more
info about it? Didn't find anything on drools expert
Object is an unlikely class name for something that contains a list
and provides a method hasInList().
Anyway, the RHS must call
update( $obj );
after modifying the list.
Note that using
SomeObject( theList contains "item" )
is the usual idiom for testing for a single element. For a subse
Hi everyone,
I've tried to go from Drools 5.3.0.Final to 5.4.0.Final and some strange
errors appeared on constraints using the after evaluator and the ||
operator.
For instance, considering these 2 objects :
public class MyObject {
private Date myDate;
public MyObject(Date myDa
Hi guys,
I'm having the follow issue: I have an object that contains a list. The object
is inserted on the memory but not the list, so I want to do something like this:
when
$obj: Object()
eval($obj.hasInList("item"))
then
$obj.replaceInList("item", "replacement");
end
H
This is a limitation of the current import process.
A Condition\Pattern spanning multiple condition columns becomes a single
free-format DRL "BRL Fragment" column. BRL Fragments are only included if
all value place holders contain a value.
In the future we would like to improve the import to buil
Hello,
I am trying to upload a decision table using excel uploads.
When I leave any cell blank, no rule is generated for that row.
As I understand from the examples and other posts, this should not have
happened and the rule should have been generated with the remaining values
in that row. I am
> We have been having real hard time understanding the examples with
> such limited/no documentation about the examples that are included in
> the product. Did someone find any other documentation on them apart
> from the 5-6 paragraphs mentioned in the reference manual? Also, we
> found the re
This rule works with 5.1.1:
rule "Map test"
when
$rb : Certifications($reqCertificationKeys : requiredCertifications.keySet)
$user : User( $userCertifications : userCertifications )
Number( $score : intValue ) from accumulate( $key: String( this
memberOf ($userCertifications.keySet())
Op 15-08-12 21:53, Garf schreef:
> spinjala wrote
>> Is it possible to have a rule flow file that defines a set of rules
>> (constraints) but executed in the order per the defined ruleflow.? I dont
>> see any example doing that so I was wondering if it is possible at all to
>> have the constrain
You don't need an separate BRL Fragment for each line in the DRL. Why not
define a BRL Fragment for this:-
data : RuleData( controlCode == 123, term = )
You'll then have a column in which to enter the value of "term". If the
cell the fragment will not be included in the rule.
With kind regards,
My thoughts:
-1 to private: Keep it public - default to open :)
-1 to invitations: they are hurdle (even if they can request it themselves)
+1 to google groups. It's much easier for new people to join
(web/mail/newsgroup) than the complexity we got now with
nabble/mailing-list/gmane and less issu
See inline:
On 15/08/2012, Rana wrote:
> Please let me know what is the problem in this. It does not update the
> values
> when I get the values, it gives me null in my unit test method.
Any stack trace?
>
>
> rule "Drug Strength" extends "Provider State"
> no-loop true
> dialect "m
"this" in DRL is just like "this" in Java.
"this == null" is just another way of saying "false".
-W
On 15/08/2012, Hendy Irawan wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> "this == null" is weird indeed in Java, but I honestly don't know how to
> express this expression in Drools DSL.
>
> A more realistic rule wou
59 matches
Mail list logo
