Here is my setup:
Guvnor 5.5.0 Final
Tomcat 7
Oracle 11g DB for repository
Jackrabbit clustering enabled
Custom Authenticator
Fine grained authorization enabled
Accessing Guvnor on Firefox
I created 2 users and granted "package.admin" to the same package with some
rules.
These 2 users are not Admi
Thanks again Woflgang.
http://blog.athico.com/2013/02/design-patterns-in-production-systems.html
Mark
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
The whitepaper "Design Patterns in Production Systems" has just been
published here: https://engage.redhat.com/forms/rule-design-patterns
My sincere thanks to all users on this list whose questions have directed
my research, and to the folks at Red Hat who have contributed to get this
paper publis
The drools, jbpm, planner, guvnor blog is here:
http://blog.athico.com/
We're also on G+
Op 06-02-13 21:12, Grant Rettke schreef:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to the topic and wondering what blogs and other media that you
> enjoy on the topic?
>
> Grant
> ___
>
To me, this means that you have done some vaguely described actions with
imprecisely specified rules in an unknown setup, one of which did what
you decided to call "work".
-W
On 6 February 2013 21:08, IPatel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have recently started using Guvnor and created simple rules in Busin
Hi,
I have recently started using Guvnor and created simple rules in Business
Rules and DSL Configuration options. For one of my rule, i am using DSL Rule
in WHEN statement but when i try to write THEN statement, i see that i have
2 option "Insert Fact" and "Logically Insert Fact"
So without know
Hi,
I'm new to the topic and wondering what blogs and other media that you
enjoy on the topic?
Grant
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
I cannot answer your first question as I have no experience of using Guvnor
on WebSphere.
However, please note being a JBoss Project we are likely to target our
"own" application servers; but that said we do have a WAR build specific
for Apache Tomcat too.
We'd love to accept Pull Requests from a
I find guvnor is a very good tool for rule development and deployment, we
should not restrict to one application server? this force the development
team to reject guvnor as rule authoring tool.
-
with kind regards,
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-5
Is any one tried guvnor-5.5 in websphere application server?
What happen to the conponents.xml?
Why guvnor is tightly coupled with jbossAS even each version (jbossAS) got
separate war file?
this seems a big impediment for using guvnor as rule authoring tools.
Is one knows well aware these and alre
I have the same situation, I heard that the guvnor-bulk-importer but I have
not tried it yet. It is available at:
http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.drools/guvnor-bulk-importer
But I see that it is kind of limited tool:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/BRMS-438
--
View this message in conte
well, you need Lists or Maps as values of the TreeMap
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/To-group-some-objects-by-type-tp4022085p4022090.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rule
global java.util.TreeMap vehicles
rule ... when v:Vehicle() then vehicles.put(v.wheels, v);
/Marc/
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/To-group-some-objects-by-type-tp4022085p4022089.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
This bug was just resolved by /Mario Fusco/ in an impressive time!
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Extending-declared-imported-type-tp4022068p4022088.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ah right, that's good to know.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Can-get-not-equal-to-work-but-not-equal-in-LHS-tp4022074p4022087.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-use
Just for the record: this simple expression is sufficient.
int dDays = (int)(dTime/MS_PER_DAY);
Also take care: the regular clock follows Time, the pseudo clock stands still.
-W
On 06/02/2013, pdario wrote:
> I'm following your suggestions, I think I can go with them.
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
> -
16 matches
Mail list logo