Re: [rules-users] Evaluate rules for multiple facts of the same type within a StateuflSession

A lot to think about, it will take a little time to dissect this. Thank you! -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Evaluate-rules-for-multiple-facts-of-the-same-type-within-a-StateuflSession-tp4022157p4022476.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archi

[rules-users] Drools Grid & GridNode

Hi, The drools project contains Grid, GridNode interfaces + implementation into 2 different maven modules - drools-grid-impl & - drools-spring but interface definitions are different Questions: 1) Is it planned to remove interfaces from drools-spring maven module ? 2) Do we need same interfaces

[rules-users] Dispose Session in Finally Block

I was looking at the code for StatelessKnowledgeSessionImpl and both execute methods dispose of the wrapped StatefulKnowledgeSession. The calls to dispose however are not in finally blocks. Should they be? If so, I have a local update for which I can issue a pull request. Thanks, Julian ___

Re: [rules-users] GC Overhead Limit Exceeded and 1B JoinLeftNode Objects

Thanks, Mark. I am avoiding inference by storing the results of rules execution in memory and then firing the rules against those at a later point in the program execution. This workaround enables me to more directly control data flow and use a Stateless Session. In regards to my original post,

Re: [rules-users] GC Overhead Limit Exceeded and 1B JoinLeftNode Objects

On 19 Feb 2013, at 15:57, Julian Klein wrote: > Ok, so I reviewed my code again and found a spot where I am queuing up tasks > to process data that hadn't been loaded. My application shouldn't spawn a > rule sessions in the case. I have also moved to a sever with less RAM and > will begin p

Re: [rules-users] Comparing 2 Lists [Planner]

I would consider using comparable lists, where workorderSkill.compareTo(employeeSkills) can be true for the same skill. When $workorder : WorkOrder( $requiredSkills : skills) $workorderSkill : Skill ( ) from $requiredSkills $employee : Employee( ski

Re: [rules-users] Comparing 2 Lists [Planner]

I assume Engineer().skillEngineerList() is a Collection of SkillEngineer facts for the selected engineer. So there is no need to bind SkillEngineer facts that you extract from the engineer to the engineer, the binding is implicit in the POJO relationship. But more importantly, why are you bindi

Re: [rules-users] Unable to find rules package

Yes.. Its working now. I placed my ChangeSet.xml file in the bin folder and it did the trick. However, it takes too long for the app to display any results -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Unable-to-find-rules-package-tp4022466p4022469.html Sent from the Drool

Re: [rules-users] Unable to find rules package

If you paste the URL into a browser do you get the Pkg file to download? sent on the move On 19 Feb 2013 19:45, "IPatel" wrote: > Hi > > I have following code to load the package into knowledgebase. However i am > getting FileNotFound error. > > KnowledgeBuilder kbuilder = KnowledgeBuilderFact

[rules-users] Adding a priority based on enum

Inside my planning a priority would be considered a soft constraing right? I created a Enum class with 6 priority going from P1 to P6. How can I add it to my SimpleScoreCalculator? (the lower the number is, the higher is the priority) For example, i have 7 workorders, each one have a requiredWork

[rules-users] Unable to find rules package

Hi I have following code to load the package into knowledgebase. However i am getting FileNotFound error. KnowledgeBuilder kbuilder = KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilder(); kbuilder.add(ResourceFactory.newUrlResource("http://localhost:8080/guvnor-5.5.0.Final-jboss-as-

Re: [rules-users] ClassCastException after migrating from Drools 4.x to v5.5

ismaximum wrote > Just to let you know that I've raised an issue: > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-44 I just fixed this issue. Thanks for having reported it, Mario -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/ClassCastException-after-migrating-from-Drools-4-x-to

Re: [rules-users] SimpleScoreCalculator

I forgot to post the code: public HardAndSoftScore calculateScore(Distributor distributor) { int hardScore = 0; int softScore = 0; for (Engineer e : distributor.getEngineerList()){ long skill = e.getSkillEngineerList().get(0).getSkill().getId(); int requiredWorktime = 0; List requiredSkillList =

Re: [rules-users] SimpleScoreCalculator

I managed solving that problem even when there's more than one skill involved, but now my hard constraint of worktime breaks if I add more worktime than the sum of engineers worktime. (8) is the worktime, my workorders all have a worktime of 4 hours, so, I got 32 available hours and 32 hours of wo

Re: [rules-users] Drools Guvnor User authentication

Try adding namespace prefix to element jaasConfigName. You can try security: or s: I remember seeing some post that indicated that prefix was omitted in error. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Guvnor-User-authentication-tp4022448p4022462.html Sent from t

Re: [rules-users] How can I select planning-entities in the accumulate source-pattern based on a list of planning-variables?

Thanks, that is what I need. >but that's for you to resolve. I will :-)   - http://www.codessentials.com - Your essential software, for free! Follow us at http://twitter.com/#!/Codessentials From: Wolfgang Laun To: Michiel Vermandel ; Rules U

Re: [rules-users] How can I select planning-entities in the accumulate source-pattern based on a list of planning-variables?

Assuming you want to deal with one PeopleMatch at a time: when $match : PeopleMatch( $people: people ) $match: Number( intValue < 0 ) from accumulate( $task : Task(handler memberOf $people), ... I have some misgivings due to "intValue<0" and Matcher not being assignment-

Re: [rules-users] SimpleScoreCalculator

Just one correction, it is sorting correctly when there's one workorder with a skill, if there's another workorder with same skill, it doesn't sort that workorder to that skill. This is what is happening: Workorder skill ABC1 Engineer skill ABC1 Workorder skill ABC2 ---

[rules-users] How can I select planning-entities in the accumulate source-pattern based on a list of planning-variables?

Hi, I am kind of stuck in writing a rule : I have PeopleMatch facts in working memory. Each PeopleMatch has a number of persons:  PeopleMatch().getPeople = List I have planning-entities (Tasks) which have a planning-variable Person. Now I would like to create a rule to loop over the PeopleMa

Re: [rules-users] GC Overhead Limit Exceeded and 1B JoinLeftNode Objects

Ok, so I reviewed my code again and found a spot where I am queuing up tasks to process data that hadn't been loaded. My application shouldn't spawn a rule sessions in the case. I have also moved to a sever with less RAM and will begin profiling as soon as possible. Here is where I stand as of

[rules-users] SimpleScoreCalculator

Hello, since i'm not moving a step from where I am at dsl rule, I'm trying to do it with SimpleScoreCalculator, but the same is happening. public HardAndSoftScore calculateScore(Distributor distributor) { int hardScore = 0; int softScore = 0; for (Engineer e : distributor.getEngineer

[rules-users] Event insert to session with 'not( after this..)'

If I declare an event like: declare Signature @role ( event ) @timestamp(timestamp) end where timestamp is a long value set to the System.currentTimestamp() and if I have a rule that has in it $s : Signature(name=="") not(Signature(name=="XXX", this after [0s,50h] $s)) If i insert a Sig

Re: [rules-users] seeking paid support / architect / developer

Based in Copenhagen, Denmark. But we are willing to work remotely. -Br Anton On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:05 PM, cusmaimatteo [via Drools] < ml-node+s46999n4022453...@n3.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi Anton, > where is this job? > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:51 PM, kurrent93 <[hidden > email]

Re: [rules-users] seeking paid support / architect / developer

Hi Anton, where is this job? On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:51 PM, kurrent93 wrote: > Hi all > > I represent a small startup. Our core technology is based on Jboss Drools > and jBPM. > > We are seeking dedicated help from an expert or two. > > I would greatly appreciate any leads or interest. > >

Re: [rules-users] RemoveIdentities with KnowledgeAgent

In case anyone else has this problem, I've managed to do it using System properties: System.setProperty("drools.removeIdentities", "true"); But ideally I'd still like to be able to do it via the Kagent if possible.. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/RemoveIde

[rules-users] seeking paid support / architect / developer

Hi all I represent a small startup. Our core technology is based on Jboss Drools and jBPM. We are seeking dedicated help from an expert or two. I would greatly appreciate any leads or interest. FYI. I have already tried contacting Redhat and Plugtree. Kind regards Anton -- View this messag

Re: [rules-users] Comparing 2 Lists [Planner]

Why's my rule not working properly? I'm pointing my engineer and workorder filling with my list of skills, even so, it is not correctly giving the workorder to engineer. There is an available engineer with a skill and there is an unassigned workorder with skill and workorder skill is equals to eng

Re: [rules-users] Testing the count of a pattern binding variable

Yes, I was just wondering if I could use a pattern binding variable instead of a pattern. I guess I cannot. David David R Robison Open Roads Consulting, Inc. 103 Watson Road, Chesapeake, VA 23320 phone: (757) 546-3401 e-mail: drrobi...@openroadsconsulting.com web: http://openroadsconsulting.com b

Re: [rules-users] how to get the pkg from guvnor by KnowledgeAgent?

You need to add authentication in the ChangeSet.xml. Unfortunately the one that Guvnor creates for you doesn't include it. So you need to download the ChangeSet.xml into your project and load it using .newClassPathResource or .newFileResource instead. You also need to add authentication to the Ch

Re: [rules-users] Testing the count of a pattern binding variable

There's a minor problem with the syntax On 19/02/2013, Stephen Masters wrote: > Assuming that you don't have an infinite variety of accumulations you're > trying to use, something I have done previously is to create DRL technical > rule to generate accumulated values, which the DSL then uses as >

[rules-users] RemoveIdentities with KnowledgeAgent

Hi, I'm using a KnowledgeAgent to create a KnowledgeBase. However, I need to turn off Identities. In previous projects (not using knowledgeAgent) I've done: RuleBaseConfiguration conf = new RuleBaseConfiguration(); conf.setRemoveIdentities( true ); KnowledgeBase kbase = KnowledgeBaseFactory.newK

Re: [rules-users] Evaluate rules for multiple facts of the same type within a StateuflSession

See a few comments at the end. rule "assign discount" when $c: Cart( discount == null, $on: online, $citems: items, $age: age, $shipping: shipping ) $p: Param( online == $on, $pdisc: discount, $pitems: items, minage <= $age, shipping == Param.NA_SHIPPING || ==

Re: [rules-users] Testing the count of a pattern binding variable

Assuming that you don't have an infinite variety of accumulations you're trying to use, something I have done previously is to create DRL technical rule to generate accumulated values, which the DSL then uses as constraints. i.e. rule "Generate sensor counts" when $sensor : Sensor()

Re: [rules-users] Evaluate rules for multiple facts of the same type within a StateuflSession

laune wrote > I'm confident that there's a clean and manageable way of preparing > this data to work in combination with a small and constant set of > rules. I refrain from elaborating this in all details without knowing > all of the requirements. I'll try to summarize them as properly as I can..

Re: [rules-users] how to get the pkg from guvnor by KnowledgeAgent?

Check if your agent xml file is correct. I am using this one and it work fine so far: String xml = ""; xml += "http://drools.org/drools-5.0/change-set\"";; xml += " xmlns:xs=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance\"";; xml += " xs:schemaLocation=\"http://d

Re: [rules-users] Evaluate rules for multiple facts of the same type within a StateuflSession

On 19/02/2013, pdario wrote: > laune wrote >>> I have a first level discount if you pay online and a second level >>> discount >>> if you pay online AND buy a special product. >>> So, the second is true only if the first is. >> >> Not *quite* correct: you have 1st level discount if you pay online

Re: [rules-users] Evaluate rules for multiple facts of the same type within a StateuflSession

laune wrote >> I have a first level discount if you pay online and a second level >> discount >> if you pay online AND buy a special product. >> So, the second is true only if the first is. > > Not *quite* correct: you have 1st level discount if you pay online and > DO NOT buy a special product.