Could this be related to the issue at
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3721? It started with performance
issues but eventually led to this case where a NPE is thrown by the
expire/retract action. They seem quite similar and perhaps the issue
attached project could help solve this issue as we
Hello everyone,
I am new user so please guide.
Is it possible to implement 'Drools Planner-Vehicle routing' in
VisualStudio.Net 2010/2012 ?
--
Thanks,
VS ___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/lis
Hi,
Thank, I will look this example.
Bye
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-know-the-object-who-is-broken-by-hard-rule-tp4022363p4022501.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Hello everyone,
I am new user so please guide.
Is it possible to implement *'Drools Planner-Vehicle routing' * in
*VisualStudio.Net 2010/2012 ?*
--
Thanks,
VS
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Planner-Vehicle-routing-in-VisualStudio-Net-tp4022500.html
Hi,
Is it possible to capture which move was selected on step-end?
I don't mean in the logging but by event or custom selector or... ?
Thanks
Michiel
-
http://www.codessentials.com - Your essential software, for free!
Follow us at http://twitter.com/#!/Codessentials_
Hi,
The examples contain
package org.drools.planner.examples.common.swingui
class ConstraintScoreMapDialog
I think this is what you are looking for.
Regards,
Michiel
-
http://www.codessentials.com - Your essential software, for free!
Follow us at http://twitter.com/#!/C
Hello,
We are trying to incorporate Drools to our architecture and make sure all
rules are separated from our current code base. So I am totally new and I
am working on creating a decision table using the Guvnor Web guided editor.
So my question: I am trying to create a decision table with vertic
I added another variable to check if it would still show the broken
constraint and break the planner, and it still happens, I added this:
WorkOrder wo33 = new WorkOrder(103l, 8, Priority.P1, Nature.CORRECTIVE);
SkillWorkOrder swo333 = new SkillWorkOrder(20333l, wo33, ABC1);
SkillWorkOrder swo3332
Problem solved (still I think so):
It was simpler (if i'm right):
List tempEngSkillList = new ArrayList();
for (SkillEngineer se : e.getSkillEngineerList()){
tempEngSkillList.add(se.getSkill());
}
if (tempEngSkillList.containsAll(requiredSkillList)){
hardScore += 1;
}
the result
Not fixed, i threw it on excel and make a comparison with expected results
and there are 2 broken there. This is how it would be (feasible solution):
ID 101 - Engineer Richard
ID 102 - Engineer Andre
ID 103 - Engineer Denny
ID 104 - Engineer Andre
ID 105 - Engineer Andre
ID 106 - Engineer Andre
ID
I think I fixed it, but the broken constraint is still showing, i don't
know how to remove it. I did this:
verified if the engineer skill list had the same size or bigger than the
requiredSkillList, iterate to check skills between both counting the
matches and then, if the match was 100% to other,
Verify that you have given that user permissions in the administration
module.
Here is my experience when I tried Guvnor 5.5 with JAAS...
After I got past that namespace issue, I ran into a Seam issue where user
was returning null. After searching, it seemed that was a bug in Seam
security that was
After some workaround I noticed that the workorders are not being 100%
corretly distributed to, i've changed the scorecalculator to this:
int commonSkillCount = 0;
for (Skill s : requiredSkillList){
for (SkillEngineer se : e.getSkillEngineerList()){
if (se.getSkill().getId() == s.getId()){
commonS
Thanks for the answer Armand, I'll try to explain better the model, since
there's more people asking me about it here by e-mail (Ana Kuzjminska and
others).
Before that, I tried what you passed me, I had already tried that aproach,
but didn't work, it sorts, but doesn't give the engineer the prope
Hi,
I'm sorry but I don't find the example.
Can you explain me where it is ?
Thank.
Bye ;)
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-know-the-object-who-is-broken-by-hard-rule-tp4022363p4022484.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nab
Unsubscribe
On 20 February 2013 12:16, ge0ffrey wrote:
> Mister Nono wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> > I use Drools Planner and an object does not accepted by a hard rule.
> >
> > And then, I obtain à negative hard result and I must present to user why
> > the result is not correct.
> >
> > How to know the
Mister Nono wrote
> Hi,
>
> I use Drools Planner and an object does not accepted by a hard rule.
>
> And then, I obtain à negative hard result and I must present to user why
> the result is not correct.
>
> How to know the object broken by the hard rule when the result is negative
> ?
>
> Thank
On 20 Feb 2013, at 06:29, Charles Moulliard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The drools project contains Grid, GridNode interfaces + implementation into 2
> different maven modules
>
> - drools-grid-impl &
> - drools-spring
>
> but interface definitions are different
ignore drools-grid-impl, it was an exper
FYI, one of the next releases will include a new feature, called
"defeasibility",
which is specifically designed for situations where "higher ranking" rules
are allowed to override the consequence of other rules.
We have an initial prototype working, but it will take a few more weeks
to get
it rele
19 matches
Mail list logo
