Hi Davide,
Thanks a lot for the information and your time spent on troubleshooting the
scenario with a test case.
I'm using 5.5.0; as I mentioned, I'm a newbie. I'll try to get 5.5.1
compiled and running (on windows), I'm reading whatever the documentation I
can find on how to do this. Github
yes, the dialect is declared as mvel. The pong game is also part of the
standard-examples that come with drools-experts. It's the same if I import
this example unmodified. But as it runs, it seams to be only an issue with
the eclipse plugin. Annoying, but no serious problem.
thanks to all for
You should be able to
git clone ...
the droolsjbpm repository, then
git checkout -t origin/5.5.x
this should switch to 5.5.1-SNAPSHOT (you can check the pom in the root
folder)
eventually, mvn clean install should do the trick.
See also the readme.md in github
Btw, it seems that you're working
Define the type as a java class and the error should go away .
- Mail original -
De: Stefan Schuster stefan.m.schus...@gmail.com
À: Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 11 Avril 2013 10:38:01
Objet: Re: [rules-users] Drools beginner - unable to resolve method
Thanks a lot again, you made my life easy with the build instructions :)
Yes I'm trying to do an integration. I have some experience with
ontologies and want to experiment with drools as an alternative.
OWL with reasoners like Fact ++ are pretty much good for the job, except
for the fact
Hello,
I've got the following basic code that sets up drools in STREAM mode, with a
pseudo clock.
And it fails on the last line that asserts there is an entrypoint named
testEntryPoint.
The DRL file references the entry-point which according to the documentation is
enough.
What am I missing?
We basically have a batch application which needs to be able to pump through
2 billion records and apply a relatively small ruleset(say a couple hundred
rules). My thought is to look at doing something with Drools and Hadoop but
I am wondering if anyone else has done a large dataset such as this(I
My company started out using Drools/Guvnor v5.1.1, for a single
product/project. Later, we decided to start building an enterprise oriented
service, which was partially completed and is based upon Drools/Guvnor
v5.3.0.
Recently, the decision has been made to get all of our Drools/Guvnor
instances
I'm not sure there's a huge benefit. The main reason I was looking at upgrades
from 5.3 recently was to sort out the problem in Guvnor where LHS and RHS rows
are misaligned in Guvnor web decision tables. That was fixed in 5.4.
Having just attempted the migration, I would agree with avoiding
Hi Geoffrey,
Do you think it would be possible to integrate the nurse rostering example
with the vrp example? By that I mean to schedule nurses *and* stops in an
optimal way. At the same time.
I'm looking at a home care service problem where there is a need for weekly
schedules for the nurses as
Continuing with this same example, How can I count the number of times a
student has received an A across all the classes?
I can get it to trigger each time a student appears in the rosters of 2
different teachers and that student has an A in both but I can't figure out
how to track it across
So that would be my tip … unless you're experiencing problems on 5.3 that
were resolved in 5.4, just hang fire on the effort of upgrading until a patch
or
two have gone out on 5.5.
How far behind the latest release do folks usually lag? I'm just
curious as I'm used to trying to stay current
On 11-04-13 18:38, Mats Norn wrote:
Hi Geoffrey,
Do you think it would be possible to integrate the
nurse rostering example with the vrp example? By that I mean
to schedule nurses *and* stops in an optimal way. At the same
time.
Look up Conditional Element collect in the manual. That provides example code
for getting a list of matching facts.
For more complex tasks, there's accumulate.
Steve
On 11 Apr 2013, at 17:51, Alex Burman alexbur...@gmail.com wrote:
Continuing with this same example, How can I count the
Ontology Reasoners and Rule Engines are quite different, can be
integrated under some assumptions,
but are definitely not easily interchangeable.. (unique name assumption,
closed world assumption, etc..)
Which one is better pretty much depends on the use case, which also
dictates the required
We've been running drools-guvnor on JBoss EAP 5 for quite some time now.
Today I downloaded and installed JBoss EAP 6.1 and drools-guvnor 5.5. I got
both started without any real problems; so far so good.
My next step was to see if I could migrate everything from the guvnor 5.0
repository to
16 matches
Mail list logo
