Re: [rules-users] Translate Drools to CLIPS rules

2013-05-30 Thread Wolfgang Laun
On 31/05/2013, Mark Proctor wrote: > > On 30 May 2013, at 23:36, "Stadin, Benjamin" > wrote: > >> I'd be willing to get involved, but since you mention clp to drl only, >> will it also be possibly to convert drl to clp? > yes. There is already a "DrlDumper" that takes a Rule and dumps it to a >

[rules-users] Error during fetching rules via REST API

2013-05-30 Thread abhinay_agarwal
Hi, I am trying to access guvnor(on tomcat) through my application(on websphere) through a rest API call using "HttpURLConnection", but when i use connection.connect(); it throws me the following error. Any idea about this error or which jar might I be missing, java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:

Re: [rules-users] Translate Drools to CLIPS rules

2013-05-30 Thread Mark Proctor
On 30 May 2013, at 23:36, "Stadin, Benjamin" wrote: > I'd be willing to get involved, but since you mention clp to drl only, will > it also be possibly to convert drl to clp? yes. There is already a "DrlDumper" that takes a Rule and dumps it to a string, using a bunch of recursive mvel temp

Re: [rules-users] Translate Drools to CLIPS rules

2013-05-30 Thread Stadin, Benjamin
I'd be willing to get involved, but since you mention clp to drl only, will it also be possibly to convert drl to clp? It could be my imagination only, but I think the possibility to define a process once for a parent server instance and being able to execute (parts of the process) temporarily

Re: [rules-users] Translate Drools to CLIPS rules

2013-05-30 Thread Mark Proctor
drools-clips was both a parser and a shell. The parser basically converted clp fr drl, to then be executed in a shell. There was however no interested in the project at all, so we discontinued it. The parser and converter might be salvageable, if the project is rescoped simply at a clp to drl t

Re: [rules-users] Guvnor 6.0 User Security

2013-05-30 Thread Mark Proctor
On 30 May 2013, at 21:26, Michael Anstis wrote: > At the moment 6.0 authenticates users from a properties file (drools-wb) or > with JACC (kie-drools-wb and kie-wb). > > Uberfire, the underlying workbench library, supports a finer grained > permissions model however we are still discussing re

Re: [rules-users] Guvnor 6.0 User Security

2013-05-30 Thread Michael Anstis
At the moment 6.0 authenticates users from a properties file (drools-wb) or with JACC (kie-drools-wb and kie-wb). Uberfire, the underlying workbench library, supports a finer grained permissions model however we are still discussing requirements for 6.0. Previous "package" level permissions may b

[rules-users] Translate Drools to CLIPS rules

2013-05-30 Thread Stadin, Benjamin
Hi, I'm interested in possibilities to convert (one-way) Drools to CLIPS rules. I've followed the discussion about the canceled support for the CLIPS parser in Drools ("Drools Clips", last reply 2 Feb 2013). However, are there any options left to make a one-way conversion? My interest in this

Re: [rules-users] Guvnor and DSL i18n

2013-05-30 Thread Michael Anstis
To be honest, I don't think any documentation has been updated for 6.0 from 5.5, we've just not had the time yet. That said, as far as I am concerned, DSLs remain in 6.0. We have continued suppprt for them in Drools Workbench (what was called Guvnor, but more about that soon). DSLs are basically

[rules-users] Using a teradata db with DROOLS (or RH BRMS) - has anyone done it?

2013-05-30 Thread William W. Austin
Quick question: we've been using Oracle with the BRMS (and with DROOLS running with Tomcat) without only minor issues. Now someone has the idea to replace Oracle with Teradata, and I'm supposed to prototype a JDBC connection - which for various reasons has not been going smoothly. Has anyone

Re: [rules-users] Guvnor and DSL i18n

2013-05-30 Thread abluesongbird
Can you provide a reason/reference/link that casts doubt on continued DSL support in Guvnor 6? DSLs are still included in the Guvnor 6's Beta documentation, so I figured that they will continue to be supported. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-and-DSL-i

Re: [rules-users] Deployment on websphere

2013-05-30 Thread drdaveg
5.3 worked much better, without authentication. I even was able to import my 5.5 repository, albeit with some issues. Oddly, writing the PKG throws an exception. I have written the code to export a PKG before, but I wonder if this is related to the permission under the WebSphere directory? Some

Re: [rules-users] Guvnor and DSL i18n

2013-05-30 Thread rjr201
I think first question to ask is, will drools 6 still include DSLs? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-and-DSL-i18n-tp4024032p4024035.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

[rules-users] Guvnor 6.0 User Security

2013-05-30 Thread Dean Whisnant
Maybe it's too early to ask this question, but in reviewing 6.0 beta 2 I didn't see how user security would be managed. In 5.1.1 we have 100+ packages with 100+ users assigned various roles from read only to authoring. Our packages are hierarchical in that we have an overarching and intermedia

Re: [rules-users] Deployment on websphere

2013-05-30 Thread drdaveg
Thanks. With 5.5. and your components.xml I get: Trying 5.3 :) Thanks for your help! -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Deployment-on-websphere-tp4023800p4024033.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

[rules-users] Guvnor and DSL i18n

2013-05-30 Thread abluesongbird
Does Guvnor 5.5.0.Final provide i18n for created DSLs? If not, might this be an upcoming Guvnor 6 feature? I have seen the i18n/l10n of Guvnor's main UI, via the locale parameter, and this is great. To fully support international customers, though, we need to extend this to the the DSL that is a

Re: [rules-users] Deployment on websphere

2013-05-30 Thread Stephen Masters
btw … It sounds like you have tried 5.5, 5.4 and 5.2. It may be worth checking out 5.3 if you keep hitting issues with 5.5. So far I have only found 5.3 to be usable as a version of Guvnor. When I tried a migration to 5.5.0.Final I found that it had too many bugs in functionality which was cruc

Re: [rules-users] Deployment on websphere

2013-05-30 Thread Stephen Masters
Sorry … talking nonsense here. It's the other way around. Ignore me. :-/ On 30 May 2013, at 14:43, Stephen Masters wrote: > Erm … something seems wrong here. > > If you're using 5.5.0.Final, then there should be no "beans.xml" in your > WEB-INF directory. > > 5.5 uses Seam 3, which is config

Re: [rules-users] Deployment on websphere

2013-05-30 Thread Stephen Masters
Erm … something seems wrong here. If you're using 5.5.0.Final, then there should be no "beans.xml" in your WEB-INF directory. 5.5 uses Seam 3, which is configured with a "components.xml" file. Below is a copy of mine with logins disabled. Steve http://jboss.com/products/seam/components";

Re: [rules-users] Deployment on websphere

2013-05-30 Thread drdaveg
Sure! I believe this is the all from the exploded 5.5 Guvnor war: guvnor\WEB-INF\lib\seam-security-3.1.0.Final.jar guvnor\WEB-INF\lib\seam-security-api-3.1.0.Final.jar and the /WEB-INF/beans.xml: -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Deployment-on-websphere-tp4