On 08/05/2013 06:29 AM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> Guete Morge Joe,
:-) Guete Morge Wolfgang
>
> from that other thread I can recall that you are using "from
> ", which (not knowing the rest) would be high up on my
> suspect list.
That's one thing I already learnt :-) I'm not using any "from" clauses
i
Consult the section on templates in the Expert manual.
-W
On 05/08/2013, ashish6276 wrote:
> Hi
>
>I need to build Custom UI where the user will insert all the parametres
> required to write the rule. My question is How can i convert UI input in
> drl
> format. How should i save my UI inputs
Hi
I need to build Custom UI where the user will insert all the parametres
required to write the rule. My question is How can i convert UI input in drl
format. How should i save my UI inputs so that it can be easy in writing
DRl.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabbl
Guete Morge Joe,
from that other thread I can recall that you are using "from
", which (not knowing the rest) would be high up on my
suspect list.
And, in order to learn more, some monitoring should be considered. The
number of activation creations and deletions (not by firing) can
indicate waste
Hi Wolfgang
On 08/04/2013 03:10 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> A simple test shows that, with the rules as shown, you can insert 100k
> Assignments and an equal number of SourceAssignments (with ~300
> InstrumentList facts) in a matter of seconds, irrespective of the
> number of hits and misses, eith
You're welcome, good to hear that it's fixed already!
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/OptaPlanner-score-corruption-when-using-insertLogical-with-custom-objects-tp4024932p4025306.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
A simple test shows that, with the rules as shown, you can insert 100k
Assignments and an equal number of SourceAssignments (with ~300
InstrumentList facts) in a matter of seconds, irrespective of the
number of hits and misses, either way. I suspect that there is some
other fly in the ointment.
T
Hi all (sorry for the lenghty post, I'm trying to describe a basic pattern)
I have a set of similar rules which work ok, but due to increasing
number of facts are starting to create performance headaches. They all
share a basic pattern, and I wanted to ask if you think that my approach
is feasible
I am facing the issue that, even when external RDBMS is configured in
repository.xml, the "repository" directory is still created in the file
system and its size is increasing. So when external RDBMS is configured then
there shouldn't be anything created/written in FileSystem. All the data
(except
On 08/04/2013 10:05 AM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> The rule is correct, and it works with similar scenarios.There may be
> a bug, due to circumstances. Can you post a simple but complete set of
> files to reproduce this?
>
You're perfectly right :-) The rule was correct, but as I wrote in an
earlier po
Hi Tihomir,
I am facing the issue that, even when external RDBMS is configured in
repository.xml, the "repository" directory is still created in the file
system and its size is increasing. So when external RDBMS is configured then
there shouldn't be anything created/written in FileSystem. All the
The rule is correct, and it works with similar scenarios.There may be
a bug, due to circumstances. Can you post a simple but complete set of
files to reproduce this?
-W
On 03/08/2013, Joe Ammann wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm still struggling with the handling of lists and membership in the
> LHS of ru
Sorry, the actual error in my logic was totally unrelated to the
fragment below.
The problem was that the DQAttribute that should have matched below was
inserted by another rule, but the insertion was done at a time when the
checkViolations collection was still emtpy. And I had forgotten the
modif
13 matches
Mail list logo
