Re: [rules-users] Guvnor 5.5.0.Final Web decision table's advanced enum is not working.

Thanks Sent on the move On 18 Sep 2013 07:53, "Soumya.plavaga" wrote: > Thanks mantis. I have created a new ticket under Guvnor project and closed > the previous one under GuvnorSOA. Following is the jira url - > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-2049 > > > > -- > View this message in con

Re: [rules-users] Guvnor 5.5.0.Final Web decision table's advanced enum is not working.

Thanks mantis. I have created a new ticket under Guvnor project and closed the previous one under GuvnorSOA. Following is the jira url - https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-2049 -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-5-5-0-Final-Web-decision-table-s-advanc

[rules-users] rule flow execution.

Hi My ruleflowgroup contains 2 rules which have different agendagroup defined for them. If i make when condition of both the rules same the flow execution stops here only instead of going to next ruleflowgroup. I am not understanding why this is happening. -- View this message in context: h

Re: [rules-users] Guvnor 5.5.0.Final Web decision table's advanced enum is not working.

Thanks. JIRA Project "GUVNOR" would have been better, as requested. It's likely to be missed in "GUVNORSOA". Sent on the move On 18 Sep 2013 07:14, "Soumya.plavaga" wrote: > I have raised a bug as a JIRA task. Following is the bug url - > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNORSOA-62 > > Can y

Re: [rules-users] Guvnor 5.5.0.Final Web decision table's advanced enum is not working.

I have raised a bug as a JIRA task. Following is the bug url - https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNORSOA-62 Can you please take a look. Regards, Soumya -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-5-5-0-Final-Web-decision-table-s-advanced-enum-is-not-working-tp4

Re: [rules-users] No errors thrown from KnowledgeAgent

Dear Drools users, Apparently it was not caused by the previously mentioned fix. Sometimes I still had a KnowledgeAgent in my server that doesn't respond anymore which seems to be caused by a mistake in the DRL file. I started to investigate the source code of KnowledgeAgentImpl and KnowledgeB

[rules-users] CEP out of order or missing events

Can CEP detect these? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/CEP-out-of-order-or-missing-events-tp4026011.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@l

Re: [rules-users] No errors thrown from KnowledgeAgent

I'll take a look and get back to you Thanks Davide On 09/17/2013 01:51 PM, De Rooms Brecht wrote: > Dear Drools users, > Apparently it was not caused by the previously mentioned fix. > Sometimes I still had a KnowledgeAgent in my server that doesn't > respond anymore which seems to be caused by a

Re: [rules-users] gives error while retracting an object

It reminds me of a bug, could you try 5.5.0.Final or 5.6.0-SNAPSHOT? Even better, could you post a reproducer test case for your issue? Thanks Davide On 09/17/2013 02:02 AM, Ganesh wrote: > Hi Team, > > I am using drools-guvnor 5.4 version and designer 2.1 version, > > I am calling an drools obje

[rules-users] using ruleflow group and agenda group together

HI In my POC I Created 4 ruleflow groups. Each group has rules which are from 2 different agenda groups. if 2 rules which are in same ruleflowgroup have everything similar in when condition except agendagroup the flow is stoping there. If i am making the when condition different for rules in one

Re: [rules-users] Implementation of my use case - what am I doing wrong?

Thanks again. I don't have startTimestamp and endTimestamp fields. I assume these fields are created on runtime bases on duration and timestamp attributes. Isn't it? If I need to define them myself, what is the advantage of defining timestamp and duration attributes? I'll try to organize the f

Re: [rules-users] Implementation of my use case - what am I doing wrong?

On 17/09/2013, Elran Dvir wrote: > Thanks for the quick response. > > I have some more questions: > > 1. As I understand it, the timestamp attribute should be long type > representing the milliseconds since January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 GMT. Am I > right? Not necessarily. The interpretation of

[rules-users] gives error while retracting an object

Hi Team, I am using drools-guvnor 5.4 version and designer 2.1 version, I am calling an drools object from web service While retracting an object I am getting classCastException,"*java.lang.boolean cannot be cast to org.drools.spi.activation* " I am using session.retract(droolsobject);-Every tim

Re: [rules-users] Implementation of my use case - what am I doing wrong?

Thanks for the quick response. I have some more questions: 1. As I understand it, the timestamp attribute should be long type representing the milliseconds since January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 GMT. Am I right? 2. As I understand it, the duration attribute should be in milliseconds.

Re: [rules-users] Drools 5.5 : Problems with big rules file (~1.5Meg)

Can you extract and post the rule called "MyRule_01"? I'd also check the class MyEnum.. is it an enum as the name might imply? Is it implementing Comparable and/or trying to redefine the method compareTo? Davide -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-5-Probl

Re: [rules-users] Drools 5.5 : Problems with big rules file (~1.5Meg)

Hi, Tell me if your need more help. Cheers Nicolas Héron 2013/9/17 peter.kutzner [via Drools] > Hi Nicolas > > No, i don't create any objects within the rules. > I only update some fields. > > I created the rules with Guvnor and also testcases for each rule and my > workflow. > And all of them