Thanks a lot Davide! This is really nice.
We will be using it soon and let the community know if we find something to
report.
Thanks again,
Demian
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Davide Sottara wrote:
> Finally Drools 5.6.0.CR1 community edition has been released!
>
> It has been mainly a com
Davide,
Congratulations! We're lucky to have you around, are people like you that
makes open source really shine!
Thanks!
---
Alexandre Porcelli
On Nov 1, 2013, at 9:50 PM, Salaboy wrote:
> Great work Davide! Please let me know if I can help with something!
> Cheers
>
> Sent from my iPho
Great work Davide! Please let me know if I can help with something!
Cheers
Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Nov 2013, at 22:51, Mark Proctor wrote:
> Davide,
>
> Thank you for al your hard work on this. It’s great when community people
> step up to help drive the project forward.
>
> The core team
Davide,
Thank you for al your hard work on this. It’s great when community people step
up to help drive the project forward.
The core team won’t have time for any final QAing of this, so it’s up to the
community to test this and make sure it’s ok.
Good luck :)
Mark
On 1 Nov 2013, at 21:04, Da
Great work Davide.
This shows the power of the community!
Sent on the move
On 1 Nov 2013 21:05, "Davide Sottara" wrote:
> Finally Drools 5.6.0.CR1 community edition has been released!
>
> It has been mainly a community effort, driven by the use of Drools in
> several applications and research p
Finally Drools 5.6.0.CR1 community edition has been released!
It has been mainly a community effort, driven by the use of Drools in
several applications and research projects,
but it was possible thanks to the collaboration of the main developer's
team and the help of everybody
who reported bugs,
$firm should be $context...To post the rule in the public sphere I had to
modify some variables(legal company issues :-) ). The same goes for the rule
name(my replacement of text is not very good).
I understand Wolfgang's point...I just made a poor assumption(something as
someone who has used droo
Hi everybody
I am using optaplanner in real-time style. My application domain is similar
to the "Vehicle Routing" example (
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/6.0.0.CR5/optaplanner-docs/html_single/index.html#vehicleRouting).
I mean, I am using chained variables and shadow variables. I have a pro
Am I wrong or these are not the (only) rules that are being run?
1) The exception is thrown as the consequence of a rule called
com.nasdaq.rms.nq.status.Rule_Calculate_Firm_Participation_Ratio_cfb033f33c2b404fb2bff8e1b9af0175
"Rule Calculate Firm Participation Ratio", which is not shown.
2) The
Another question(on error interpretation) the stack trace seems to indicate
an issue with the consequence and not the condition. Should it be assumed
that seeing such errors could indicate an issue on either side of the rule?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/
I made an assumption(thus why I am asking) for future cases I will use the &&
separator to handle such cases as I would assume saying something like this
would work:
Object(a>0 && b>0 && a/b > 100)
laune wrote
> I haven't read a statement yet that says that, in Drools, LHS terms,
> separated by
I haven't read a statement yet that says that, in Drools, LHS terms,
separated by a comma (!) must be executed in the order they are
written, or that the C/Java semantics for logical expression
evaluation is applied.
-W
On 01/11/2013, gboro54 wrote:
> Could you expand upon why this is a poor pr
Agreed. In this case it is possible to move to the RHS...but I have to ask
what if I need to use the math as part of a constraint. Is it not safe to
assume the divisor is 0 even if I do the check? That seems like an issue as
I do have cases which this will be required
Stephen Masters wrote
> Give
I changed the rules to the following so I will test and see:
rule "Add Baseline to Context if it does not exists exists or not greater
then 0"
no-loop true
when
$context:Context($id:id,baselineParticipation==null ||
baselinePar
Given that you don’t seem to using the result as a constraint, then I can’t see
any benefit to it being on the LHS. So yes, It would be better on the RHS.
Steve
On 1 Nov 2013, at 17:58, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> I can anticipate the answer where OP says that there is a constraint
> restricting a
If the left hand side guarantees that a > 0, a right hand side
expression b/a must be safe.
-W
On 01/11/2013, gboro54 wrote:
> So move the math to the rhs? Will that resolve the issues in your opinion?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-5-divid
Could you expand upon why this is a poor practice? I assumed that if a part
of the pattern doesn't match the expression evaluation is terminated
laune wrote
> I can anticipate the answer where OP says that there is a constraint
> restricting argVolume to > 0. However, I don't think that independe
So move the math to the rhs? Will that resolve the issues in your opinion?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-5-divide-by-0-exception-tp4026582p4026586.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
I can anticipate the answer where OP says that there is a constraint
restricting argVolume to > 0. However, I don't think that independent
constraints such as we see them in this rule are evaluated as if they
were in a single logical expression, with Java semantics.
The seductive possibility of bi
Divide by zero exceptions usually occur when you try to divide by zero.
So … first question … is consolidatdVolume.avgVolume ever zero?
On 1 Nov 2013, at 16:17, gboro54 wrote:
> I have rules like the following:
>
> rule "Add Baseline to Context if it does not exists exists or not greater
> th
I have rules like the following:
rule "Add Baseline to Context if it does not exists exists or not greater
then 0"
no-loop true
when
$context:Context($id:id,baselineParticipation==null ||
baselineParticipation.baselineRatio==null|
Hi Folks,
I am new to OptaPlanner, so please forgive me if this is a stupid question.
I developed a project to solve a worker assignment problem based on
OptaPlanner. I have a java class "Demand" which has the information of
capacity needed for each shift.
I added it to the solution class as a pr
22 matches
Mail list logo
