Re: [rules-users] XML and the Guided Decision Tables

2014-05-21 Thread Michael Anstis
There is no schema for a GDST; it's simply an XStream dump of the POJO model behind the editor. We support conversion of XLS decision tables to GDST as from 5.4 (I think; it's definitely in 5.5 and 6.0). If either (a) you're not using XLS decision tables or (b) you want them converted outside of

[rules-users] XML and the Guided Decision Tables

2014-05-21 Thread Kysis
Hello my team and I are trying to write a script in order to convert and condense a decision table to import it into the workbench as a Guided Decision Table. Is there documentation for the XML file that represents a GDT? Thanks, Michael. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n

Re: [rules-users] Is @PropertySpecific supported in Drools 5.6.0

2014-05-21 Thread RavishankarHassain
Thanks for the info -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Is-PropertySpecific-supported-in-Drools-5-6-0-tp4029633p4029643.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing l

Re: [rules-users] Is @PropertySpecific supported in Drools 5.6.0

2014-05-21 Thread Davide Sottara
In the end it was actually named @PropertyReactive On 05/21/2014 12:38 AM, RavishankarHassain wrote: > I was looking fro some examples and document which explains on how to use the > @Modifies annotations inside Facts(Java class) and it happened for me to see > this doc > > http://docs.jboss.org/

Re: [rules-users] Using KieScanner in drools6

2014-05-21 Thread ganeshneelekani
Hi Mark, Thanks for suggestions.I will go through with above link I go through with document it uses maven, I do not have any knowledge on maven, Do I need to learn maven to develop project in drools 6 ? I developed using changeset.xml to link java and drools, And drools-guvnor.war, and designer.w

Re: [rules-users] Using KieScanner in drools6

2014-05-21 Thread Mark Proctor
See http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/6.1.0.Beta3/drools-docs/html/KIEChapter.html 4.2.3.5. Settings.xml and Remote Repository Setup 4.2.3.3. KieScanner 4.2.5. Installation and Deployment Cheat Sheets Mark On 21 May 2014, at 11:59, ganeshneelekani wrote: > Hi Team, > > I go through with

Re: [rules-users] Rules compilation error with OSGi integration (6.1.0.Beta3)

2014-05-21 Thread Charles Moulliard
I can reproduce your error when I deploy the project (compiled with 1.7) and running with JDK 1.7 on Karaf 2.2.1/Felix 3.2.2 (= SMX 4.5.3) 2014-05-21 13:30:25,020 | INFO | l Console Thread | ClasspathKieProject | 211 - org.drools.compiler - 6.0.3.redhat-1 | Found kmodule: bundle://214.

[rules-users] Using KieScanner in drools6

2014-05-21 Thread ganeshneelekani
Hi Team, I go through with the release doc http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/6.0.0.Final/drools-docs/html_single/ and found that 2.1.6. KieScanner The KieScanner is a maven-oriented replacement of the KnowledgeAgent present in Drools 5. using knowledgwAgent I have linked through changese

Re: [rules-users] Rules compilation error with OSGi integration (6.1.0.Beta3)

2014-05-21 Thread Ephemeris Lappis
Hello. I could try to test on ServiceMix 5 that embeds Karaf 2.3.4, but for my concrete project, the customer current platform uses a ServiceMix 4.5.3 which is not really possible to change today while many other modules are already deployed. Did you try in your environment the test project that

Re: [rules-users] Rules compilation error with OSGi integration (6.1.0.Beta3)

2014-05-21 Thread Charles Moulliard
If you look to my example posted previously there are no issues. Can you make a test using just Apache Karaf 2.3.x with Drools 6.1.0.Beta3 and tell me what happen. Which JDK do you sue ? On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Ephemeris Lappis < ephemeris.lap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello. > > Although

Re: [rules-users] Rules compilation error with OSGi integration (6.1.0.Beta3)

2014-05-21 Thread Ephemeris Lappis
Hello. Although without much conviction, I've tried the "Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment: J2SE-1.7", but it doesn't change the compilation level of the rules... As I said in a previous answer, I don't know exactly how to do it, but I think the solution may be in the way that Drools takes the