alent node type AFAIK.
Regards,
Dan Nathanson
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 8:43 AM, FrankVhh wrote:
> A rule engine will reason upon all the facts that are in its working memory,
> no matter what facts are in there. Therefore, it can not natively know
> whether it has "enough" fac
Bump
Regards,
Dan Nathanson
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Dan Nathanson wrote:
> Hi Mauricio,
>
> This is now happening intermittently for another user and a couple of
> times on our build machine. I have never seen it happen on my
> machine. This will be a show-stopp
s told that the way to check for process completion is to try to
load the process from the DB again and if it is null, then it is
complete. I didn't like that solution so I wrote a
ProcessEventListener to detect process completion because I needed to
send a JMS message.
Regards,
Dan Nathans
and the next user is never notified that they have a task,
and no errors will be reported.
Regards,
Dan Nathanson
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Dan Nathanson wrote:
> Hi Mauricio,
>
> Were you able to make determine anything from the info I sent you?
>
> Regards,
>
>
Hi Mauricio,
Were you able to make determine anything from the info I sent you?
Regards,
Dan Nathanson
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Dan Nathanson wrote:
> Hi Mauricio,
>
> Thanks for looking into this. These are the types of errors that scare
> me. They only happen in one env
reproduce the problem
regularly, although it moves around in different test cases and
different points in the flows.
Anyone ever seen this behavior before? Any possible explanations?
I'd attach the log file, but it is huge since I've got hibernate
logging
afterProcessComplete() method. Since my action upon process completion
is to send a JMS message to the person who started the process, using an
event listener is actually a little bit cleaner than checking process status
after every session state change.
Regards,
Dan Nathanson
On Tue, Mar 8
ocess
completes.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Dan Nathanson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing some odd behavior in Drools Flow 5.1.1. When using JPA and
> creating a StatefulKnowledgeSession using
> JPAKnowledgeService.newStatefulKnowledgeSession(), processes look li
added KnowledgeRuntimeLoggerFactory.newConsoleLogger(knowledgeSession) and
can see in both cases that the process is complete.
Has this been seen before? Is it a known bug? Am I doing something wrong?
Regards,
Dan Nathanson
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
the structure of the generated
process without executing it? I'm not trying to test a specific flow, I'm
trying to test the code that converts from our model to Drools.
Regards,
Dan Nathanson
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jbo
ed to setParameter matches the defined types.
Regards,
Dan Nathanson
2010/12/27 Mauricio Salatino
> I'm working with 5.2.0.SNAPSHOT.. I will try to test your code and let you
> know my results..
> Greetings.
>
> 2010/12/27 Daniel Nathanson
>
> Hi Mauricio,
>>
>&
junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:130)
at
com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:64)
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.ActionNodeInstance.internalTrigger(ActionNodeInstance.java:54)
... 34 more
Regards,
Dan Nathanson
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
12 matches
Mail list logo
