On 10/25/07, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know of any tutorials but I've been running Drools and JBoss
> together with a MySQL database and EJB3 for about 18 months now. Currently
> on Drools 4.02 with JBoss 4.2.1GA. It all works pretty well except for for
> the need to use the J
Hello Markus,
>
> Hi, I have two questions for pattern matching with drools:
>
> 1. I have a multiline string to which a would match an expression. I've
> tried that in various ways, but none worked. Is this not supported?
>
You can prefix the regex to be matched with "(?m)", which enables
multili
> >
> You can prefix the regex to be matched with "(?m)", which enables
> multiline mode. The full set of available flags are documented under
> "Special Constructs" on the javadoc for pattern:
>
Whoops, that should be (?s) for the DOTALL flag, which specifies that
"." should match any character,
Hello Brian,
I've done something similar previously using a combination of a field
binding constraint, an eval and the excellent joda-time API
(http://joda-time.sourceforge.net/). If I remember right, you'd need
something along the lines of :
import org.joda.time.Duration;
import org.joda.time.Da
Hi Edson,
On 8/23/07, Edson Tirelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Looks like a bug. Can you please open a JIRA for this?
>
Done.
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1116
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jb
I've filed a JIRA for this issue
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1114
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Hello again,
I'm probably missing something fundamental here, but I have the
following rulebase:
package org.drools.examples
rule "Hello World"
when
Integer()
then
System.out.println("Hello world");
end
rule "Goodbye World"
when
not In
s of
> Object, and that is why the rule fires.
>If instead of Object, you use a different class, like Integer for
> instance, to constrain your rule, you will get the behavior you are looking
> for.
>
> []s
>Edson
>
> 2007/8/22, Dean Jones < [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
I have the following simple rulebase:
package org.drools.examples
rule "Hello World"
when
o : Object( )
then
System.out.println("Hello world (o=" + o + ")");
end
rule "Goodbye World"
when
not Object( )
then
System
Isn't the problem that the function parameter (loanAmount) doesn't
have a type? Or am I missing something?
Dean.
On 7/25/07, Edson Tirelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Natraj,
Can you try it with the 4.0GA release please? We fixed a couple issues
related to functions for the final relea
Hi Thomas,
On 7/16/07, Hehl, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Couldn't you use yield() to generate a context-switch? It would only happen
in that spot, but should produce some good testing.
It's a good point about using yield(). I did use this originally, but
for some reason it generated few
Hello Eugeny,
Not sure if this is the recommended way, but I did something similar
using the classes in the org.drools.lang.descr package. You can create
a PackageDescr from your custom objects and then call
PackageBuilder.addPackage(PackageDescr) and
PackageBuilder.getPackage() to get an org.dro
On 7/14/07, Mark Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are going to need an integration test, to reproduce this, can you
supply one?
Okay, I've just converted the simple test that I added earlier to a
Junit test. The test is not guaranteed to fail if there are thread
safety errors, just very li
Hi Mark,
On 7/13/07, Mark Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think I've alread fixed this in trunk - when dealing with add/removing
stuff I now do a block syncronisation on the pkgs instance. If that test is
clean, we should add it to the list of integration tests, to track
regressions.
I
Hi Edson,
On 7/12/07, Edson Tirelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible for you to provide a test case capable of reproducing the
problem?
I've written a quick test case, which is attached. When numberOfThreads==1,
everything compiles okay. When numberOfThreads==100, I get function
c
Dean Jones gmail.com> writes:
>
>
Sorry, I forgot to say that the problem originally happened when using Drools
v4.0MR2 and also occurs when using v4.0MR3,
Dean.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.
Hello folks,
I'm experiencing some odd behaviour from Drools (or maybe the Eclipse
compiler) when load-testing my application, and wondered if anyone
else had experienced the same issue. I have a web service which, for
every request, loads in rules from the database, creates a
org.drools.lang.des
17 matches
Mail list logo
