Re: [rules-users] RuntimeDroolsException

On 8/16/07, Mark Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll probably want to speak to ILog about help with JRules. > > Mark > :) -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.

Re: [rules-users] Drools - is dynamic change possible ?

f and when to invalidate your cached ruleset, that's entirely your decision to make. Someone else can let you know how applicable what I just said is to 4.0. ;) - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.

Re: [rules-users] if statement in MVEL consequence

a better api for this sort of thing. Something along the lines of: logger.debug("LanguageMismatch - ptld: {}, Lang: {}, staffId: {}", $pd.participant.id, $ptLanuage, $nd.staffId); That buys you conditional logging without requiring the performance hit of assembling a string unless loggin

Re: [rules-users] Entreprise using Drools with success

relatively easy-to-use, powerful and performant choice for many of the things people consider using it for. - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Re: [rules-users] Tutorial?

ss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rules-users mailing list rules

Re: [rules-users] Re: [drools-user] More Fun with JBoss Rules IDE and JBoss Rules in general

stment Qty : 100% Tolerance" has the same translated rules name as "RNR Qty >= RNR Adjustment Qty : 100% Tolerance"; please rename one of these rules. That'd make the problem a little more clear, but I don't like it as much. Anyway -- I'm not writing the code,

Re: [rules-users] Re: [drools-user] More Fun with JBoss Rules IDE and JBoss Rules in general

a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com _______ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Re: [rules-users] From v 3.0.6 to 4.0.0

you can use one of the following approaches: Huh - shades of Drools 2.X. If you don't mind me asking, what are the 'couple of reasons'? If there are reasons, then people might want to know before choosing to, for instance, turn on the system property. - Ge

Re: [rules-users] LHS and value

ot;)); Is it possible what I try to do in the line 3? I'm receiving: unknown:66:18 Unexpected token '"UID"' Maybe it would help if you tried to describe what you're trying to do? Why would you want to insert a key/value p

Re: [rules-users] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/drools/RuleBase

t Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Re: [rules-users] jdk1.3 compatible??

a problem for us. - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey Wiseman ___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users