> So that would be my tip … unless you're experiencing problems on 5.3 that
> were resolved in 5.4, just hang fire on the effort of upgrading until a patch
> or
> two have gone out on 5.5.
How far behind the latest release do folks usually lag? I'm just
curious as I'm used to trying to stay curr
, Magnarelli, James
wrote:
> Though all of those are worthy pursuits, I want to do it in the sense of
> unit testing to make sure that I have defined the rule correctly.
>
> Thanks for your rapid response, by the way. I really appreciate it.
>
> -- James
>
>
>
>
>
>
e Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ___
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Grant Rettke | ACM, AMA, COG, IEEE
gret...@acm.org | http://www.wisdo
>>
>>>>>> There is this production rule system where you can write your rules
>>>>>> embedded in compiling units, and alongside the legacy program units, of
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> procedural, modular, strongly type HLL, and where you use expressions
>>>>>> in
>>>>
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Mark Proctor wrote:
> http://blog.athico.com/2013/03/instant-drools-starter-pack-publishing.html
Nice! Just ordered it.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/r
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Mark Proctor wrote:
> For instance here is an idea I've been mulling over recently (note just
> random ideas, not roadmap). We don't have
> the resources to completely compete against other languages, and I'm not sure
> we should do. With Java8 and 9 it
> starts
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Matteo Mortari wrote:
> The Question I'm asking myself: is there a specific, or few, areas where
> Functional Programming could actually benefit Expert Systems so much to
> actually spawn new paradigms of writing Rules? Or benefit in a new
> generation of the Rete a
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> I dislike the artificial creation of mysteries - as if we hadn't enough
> without.
>
Who says it was artificially created?!
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jb
6999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-5-5-tp4022096p4022142.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ___
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-user
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Stephen Masters wrote:
> I'd probably recommend using Drools Expert within your application on WAS,
> and stick with running Guvnor on Tomcat, as it does't need to be part of a
> 'production' installation.
>
IBM shops typically disallow running non-IBM software.
_
Hi,
I'm new to the topic and wondering what blogs and other media that you
enjoy on the topic?
Grant
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> On 01/02/2013, Mark Proctor wrote:
>>
>> On 1 Feb 2013, at 13:59, Grant Rettke wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Mark Proctor
>>> wrote:
>>>> It was only a POC that partially
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Mark Proctor wrote:
> It was only a POC that partially worked, and then stopped working, so I
> removed it. No one was using it, or came forward to help develop it, so
> figured it was kinder to put it
> out of its misery.
I see. How much interest was there in i
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> It's like this famous torso of Praxiteles:
Thanks! lol
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
Hi,
Anyone using or have used Drools Clips before? If so, what is your
opinion of it? If not, why not?
I'm pretty curious about it and wanted to start here before pinging
the dev list on who is maintaining it (nor not).
Best wishes,
--
Grant Rettke | ACM, AMA, COG, IEEE
gret...@acm.org |
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Stephen Masters wrote:
> fyi - if you're just learning your way around working memory event listeners
> and the like, here's some example code. It's an extended version of
> something I found in the Drools docs.
Cool. Thanks for the code.
The discussion has got m
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Cotton, Ben
wrote:
> this "when do rules fail to fire?" pattern seems to be an important one for
> those with
> detailed accounting/audit use case requirements. But, it is a pattern that
> is (currently) a
> laborious key-stroke intensive "burden" (too strong a
; communication in error, please destroy all electronic and paper copies and
>> notify the sender immediately. Mistransmission is not intended to waive
>> confidentiality or privilege. Morgan Stanley reserves the right, to the
>> extent permitted under applicable law, to monitor electronic communications.
>> This message is subject to terms available at the following link:
>> http://www.morganstanley.com/disclaimers If you cannot access these links,
>> please notify us by reply message and we will send the contents to you. By
>> messaging with Morgan Stanley you consent to the foregoing.
>>
>>
>> ___
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
> ___
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
--
Grant Rettke | ACM, AMA, COG, IEEE
gret...@acm.org | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/
Wisdom begins in wonder.
((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x)))
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Cotton, Ben
wrote:
> Would it be reasonable to suggest that the Drools team provide the user
> community with some tool, API, or other framework construct that might
> assist us when we are faced with this exact task?
I'm studying rules engines. This desire seems
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> Red Hat reps promised the White Paper for today.
Cool. Where?
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ___
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Grant Rettke | ACM, AMA, COG, IEEE
gret...@ac
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:50 PM, katvik wrote:
> I think I am looking for "detect whenever a constraint is not satisfied", as
> I need to simply provide the reasons why rule has no resulted in an action.
It sounds like the simple answer is to do like Wolfgang said; hacking
the internals sounds t
n3.nabble.com/Capturing-condition-constraint-evaluation-results-tp4021831.html
>> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> ___
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>> http
23 matches
Mail list logo
