, without update() of the fact?
-W
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Javier Vera Gomez
wrote:
> Thanks for answering,
>
> Further detail:
> The actual output is the rule is fired (ie, the param is not found) and then
> the param is printed out. So, in fact, the param does exists.
arams(); the code used
to create the Task fact, and the actual output.
-W
2009/11/9 Javier Vera Gomez :
> Hi,
>
> I've been using drools 4.07 for a while. I have found a weird case. It seems
> that when evaluating the LHS some fact is true but the RHS probes it wasn't
> actuall
Hi,
I've been using drools 4.07 for a while. I have found a weird case. It
seems that when evaluating the LHS some fact is true but the RHS probes
it wasn't actually true.
The example code is at the end. It is very weird to me I have no clue
about how to solve this or what could be happening!
