On 08/13/2013 04:31 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> Sorry, I missed that.
>
> rule "R7012: UpdateInstrumentsIssuerFrom700[01]"
> agenda-group "TRANSFER_TO_LIVE"
> salience 100
> when
> sirole : SourcingInstitutionRole(sourcing_Status ==
> SourcingStatus.IMPORTED,
>
On 08/13/2013 03:18 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> rule "R7012: UpdateInstrumentsIssuerFrom700[01]"
> agenda-group "TRANSFER_TO_LIVE"
> salience 100
> when
> sirole : SourcingInstitutionRole(sourcing_Status ==
> SourcingStatus.IMPORTED,
> roleCd == "7000" || ==
On 08/13/2013 03:02 PM, Joe Ammann wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Trying to do the following: as one pattern of a rule, I want to bind a
> variable to a fact with code "7001", or (if such a fact does not exist)
> to one with the value "7000".
>
> Until now, I haven&#x
Hi all
Trying to do the following: as one pattern of a rule, I want to bind a
variable to a fact with code "7001", or (if such a fact does not exist)
to one with the value "7000".
Until now, I haven't been able to formulate this in one single rule, as
simple as it sounds - probably I'm just overl
On 08/05/2013 09:04 AM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> Fine. Although occasionally useful, "from " is often used
> as a cover-up for inadequate design of fact types. (from
> collect/accumulate is a different matter.)
That was exactly the case before we found out how to make fact types
"more rule friendly"
On 08/05/2013 06:29 AM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> Guete Morge Joe,
:-) Guete Morge Wolfgang
>
> from that other thread I can recall that you are using "from
> ", which (not knowing the rest) would be high up on my
> suspect list.
That's one thing I already learnt :-) I'm not using any "from" clauses
i
Hi Wolfgang
On 08/04/2013 03:10 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> A simple test shows that, with the rules as shown, you can insert 100k
> Assignments and an equal number of SourceAssignments (with ~300
> InstrumentList facts) in a matter of seconds, irrespective of the
> number of hits and misses, eith
Hi all (sorry for the lenghty post, I'm trying to describe a basic pattern)
I have a set of similar rules which work ok, but due to increasing
number of facts are starting to create performance headaches. They all
share a basic pattern, and I wanted to ask if you think that my approach
is feasible
On 08/04/2013 10:05 AM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> The rule is correct, and it works with similar scenarios.There may be
> a bug, due to circumstances. Can you post a simple but complete set of
> files to reproduce this?
>
You're perfectly right :-) The rule was correct, but as I wrote in an
earlier po
modify() after filling the checkViolations collection.
So the rule "saw" an empty collection and that last condition did not
trigger. Once I corrected that, things started working :-)
On 08/03/2013 10:59 PM, Joe Ammann wrote:
> Here's what I currently have (Drools 5.5.0 btw):
&
Hi all
I'm still struggling with the handling of lists and membership in the
LHS of rule. I'm trying to formulate a rule that only fires if a certain
object is not yet a member of a list.
Here's what I currently have (Drools 5.5.0 btw):
rule "R2030: UpdateDQAttribute"
dialect "mvel"
Hi Rich
On 08/06/2012 03:26 PM, rtella wrote:
> I'm looking into integrating Drools with a system that has large (40GB+)
> Gemfire Maps. The rules would need to access the Gemfire Maps, which can be
> updated at any time.I understand I can't access the Gemfire Maps as
> global data since t
Hi Wolfgang
On 05/17/2012 06:31 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> you might also consider adding your own rule to one of the existing
> verifyer DRL files. I think they are part of some .jar file, so all
> you'd need to do is de-jar, edit, re-jar, or just fiddle with class
> path if that's the way the ve
Hi all
coming from another thread [1], Wolfgang pointed me to the Guvnor/Drools
verifier. I am looking now for ways to implement my own verification
rules into Guvnor.
Ideally, I would like to be able to hook into 2 places in Guvnor with
custom rules (maybe these are going actually through the sa
On 05/16/2012 09:06 AM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> On 16/05/2012, Joe Ammann wrote:
>> On 05/15/2012 07:24 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>>> Assuming you can get hold of the resulting DRL text, a simple script
>>> might detect rules where there is nothing between "then
On 05/15/2012 07:24 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> Assuming you can get hold of the resulting DRL text, a simple script
> might detect rules where there is nothing between "then" and "end".
I have currently implemented something similar. A REST client that
periodically scans the BRLs in certain Guvnor
Hi all
I have an ongoing discussion with my users: They have been using several
home-grown rule oriented applications for years. Almost all of these
"rule engines" were built for one very specific reason, and the users
have come accustomed to just specify a LHS of a rule. They never needed
to spec
On 02/09/2012 09:34 AM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
> The perm gen space is a subset of the heap space.
> So it doesn't make sense to put them on the same value.
>
> Try this instead:
> -Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m
> Or, if that fails:
> -Xmx2048m -XX:MaxPermSize=1024m
>
Sorry to disagree Geo
On 12/27/2011 03:11 PM, Esteban Aliverti wrote:
> Guvnor 5.4 comes with a new change-set editor that allows users to
> define their custom change-sets instead of using the default layout: 1
> package -> 1 change-set.
Me likes that! A lot!
Exactly what I needed to allow re-use of rules/packages.
On 12/02/2011 06:02 AM, Jervis Liu wrote:
> On 2011/12/1 19:03, Joe Ammann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On 12/01/2011 06:40 AM, Jervis Liu wrote:
>>> the Asset.type is a standard property from Dublin core
>>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dublin_Core), though this pro
Hi Michael
On 12/01/2011 05:48 PM, Michael Anstis wrote:
> Firstly, "no" you are not missing anything :)
Hm, I kind of had hoped
> What you describe does not sound like inheritance: more of a fall
> through of assets from a top level package to lower sub-packages.
Yes, that's what I mean, and
Hi
my users asked me to provide something like "package inheritance" in
Guvnor. They would like to be able to define some artefact types (most
notably DLSs, Working Sets, function definitions and extensible rules)
in a "parent package", and then create "sub packages" where only the
pure rule defin
Hi
On 12/01/2011 06:40 AM, Jervis Liu wrote:
> the Asset.type is a standard property from Dublin core
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dublin_Core), though this property is
> never used by Guvnor Asset or Package, its always empty. I will remove
> this property from the REST API. Thanks for poi
Hi all
I'm trying to integrate Guvnor into my application via the REST API.
Little question to the Asset data structures.
The doc
(http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.3.0.Final/drools-guvnor-docs/html/ch09.html#d0e2282)
says, that every Asset has a "type", and via AssetMetadata also a
"format"
On 14.07.2011 19:43, Michael Anstis wrote:
> IIRC, WAS's classloaders work in a different order to other containers.
>
> I might be talking a load of baloneybut I have a feeling this is the case.
>
> I have another feeling you can configure this to be top-down or
> bottom-up or something along thos
On 23.06.2011 21:27, Michael Anstis wrote:
> Have you tried salience?
>
Yeah, sorry forgot to mention. THis was the first thing I tried.
--
CU, Joe
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-
Stumbled over this today in a specific case, but my question is about a
general practice (I'm quite new to Drools, 5.2.0.M2 btw). I have a
knowledge session with a fair amount of facts (0.5 Mio) and mostly
simple rules. One rule has a LHS expression that I know will be
expensive to execute, in the
27 matches
Mail list logo
