Thanks Geoffrey
I solved this problem. In case anyone is interested, I have attached the
fixed test with your suggestions.
Best regards
2013/11/4 Geoffrey De Smet
>
> On 04-11-13 14:24, Juan Ignacio Barisich wrote:
>
> You are right.
> Do you think that is a bug? Or is
You are right.
Do you think that is a bug? Or is there a hack to solve this?
2013/11/4 Geoffrey De Smet
>
> On 04-11-13 13:10, Juan Ignacio Barisich wrote:
>
>Geoffrey, thanks for response.
> The the Customer "toRemove" instance IS the same instance as which is i
the entity (10(after null)) for chained
planningVariable (previousStandstill) cannot be retracted: it was never
inserted.
Can you take a look to the test I have attached and guide me to solve this?
Thanks a lot.
Regards
2013/11/4 Geoffrey De Smet
>
> On 01-11-13 19:38, Juan Ignacio
6.0.0.CR5/examples/sources/src/test/java/org/optaplanner/examples/vehiclerouting/app/
directory.
<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4017760/serverlog.zip>I'd
appreciate any ideas on how to resolve this.
Best regards,
Juan Ignacio Barisich
package org.optaplanner.examples.vehicle
There is enough information for me.
Thanks a lot Mauricio.
2013/10/28 Mauricio Salatino
> We are working hard on get it out soon, but there is no definitive date as
> far as I know.. Maybe early next week (??)
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Juan Ignacio Barisich
Hi everybody.
I need to know if is there a planned release date for Drools platform
6.0.0.Final.
Thanks
Regards
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
t; Also see the VRP with timewindows example for an implementation that uses
> shadow variables :)
>
>
> On 25-10-13 00:27, Juan Ignacio Barisich wrote:
>
> Hi again. The problem was a score corruption issue. When I activate
> de mode debug:
>
¿have you know similar scenarios, in which you have to
process the entire chain to calculate the score of a solution? ¿is there a
way to solve this?
Thanks
Regards
2013/9/2 Juan Ignacio Barisich
> Hi everybody.
> I have a problem with chained planning variables.
> I'm us
Hi everybody.
I have a problem with chained planning variables.
I'm using optaplanner 5.5.0.Final.
I have a planning entity like:
@PlanningEntity()
public class Case implements Chained {
private Chained previous;
@PlanningVariable(chained = true)
@ValueRanges({
@ValueRange(
nFilter.java:59)
org.jboss.web.tomcat.filters.ReplyHeaderFilter.doFilter(ReplyHeaderFilter.java:96)
-
Is this a bug? or I'm doing something wrong?
Thanks in advance
--
*J
In
this way, it would be better to have one knowledge session instance per
process instance.
Thanks in advance.
--
*Juan Ignacio Barisich*
juan.baris...@fluxit.com.ar
www.fluxit.com.ar
53 n366, piso 9
La Plata / Buenos Aires / Argentina
(54)-221-4
Hello everyone.
I'm working on a research about migration from OSWorklow to DroolsFlow.
Among other things, I need spring integration support. As I know, this
feature will be supported in the 5.1.0CR1 version of Drools. Do you know
when this version will be released? On
https://jira.jboss.org/brows
12 matches
Mail list logo