Re: [rules-users] Drools 5 for process simulation

2010-08-16 Thread Labin, Jonathan W.
.@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 11:33 AM To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools 5 for process simulation On 04/08/2010 16:20, Labin, Jonathan W. wrote: Drools users, I am cur

Re: [rules-users] Drools 5 for process simulation

2010-08-04 Thread Labin, Jonathan W.
om: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 11:33 AM To: rules-users@lists.jboss.org Subject: Re: [rules-users] Drools 5 for process simulation On 04/08/2010 16:20, Labin, Jonathan W. wrote: Drools us

[rules-users] Drools 5 for process simulation

2010-08-04 Thread Labin, Jonathan W.
Drools users, I am currently researching Drools 5 as a potential toolkit to enable my next project. I have read through the Documentation for Drools Expert, Flow and skimmed through Fusion and I believe that Drools looks it provides many features we need. However, I am concerned about one aspect