This means that it cannot find your method. To be able to call a method from
within a rule you will need to import the respective class that has the method
and then use an instance to reference that method with (or just the method
without an instance if it is static and you did static import).
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Moe Alkhafaji
Chief Technology Officer, MedCPU
Phone: (630) 290-1113
Email: c...@medcpu.com
This message contains information which may be confidential. Unless you are
the addressee, you
I had to do something like this. The way I did it is by prividing a
method in my object in working memory that takes multiple Boolean
conditions and loops through them and return true if at least N of the
conditions were true. So, this funtions will take N and a list of all
conditions.
Interesting. Is there a reason for that? That doesn't sound too
efficient. How can I get around it so that everything in the drools
API uses the same default application classloader? Is there a setting
or configuration somewhere that would tell drools to just use the
default classloader?
Thanks for the reply. But I don't understand what you mean by caching
the KnowledgeBase. This is about adding a pre compiled
KnowledgePackage to a KnowledgeBase. So, how does caching a
KnowledgeBase makes addition of new KnowledgePackage faster? Please
excuse my ignorance if I am not
http://rkthinks.wordpress.com/
2010/5/3 Moe Alkhafaji moe.alkhaf...@medcpu.com
Thanks for the reply. But I don't understand what you mean by
caching the KnowledgeBase. This is about adding a pre compiled
KnowledgePackage to a KnowledgeBase. So, how does caching a
KnowledgeBase makes addition
.
In case of our application it does so by a very significant factor.
Regards,
Rajnikant Gupta
http://rkthinks.wordpress.com/
2010/5/3 Moe Alkhafaji moe.alkhaf...@medcpu.com
Hmmm, so you are suggesting I keep caches all possible combinations of
KnowledgePackages? If I have 100 possible
3, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Moe Alkhafaji moe.alkhaf...@medcpu.com
wrote:
I see. Thanks Rajnikant. I appreciate the assistance. I hope there
would be a way to maybe make this more internal to the KnowledgeBase
object itself, or define another object for this type of caching
instead of creating
in the documentations or the historic threads on this
board. Maybe someone can shed some light on how this works behind the
scenes. Thank you.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Moe Alkhafaji moe.alkhaf...@medcpu.comwrote:
Is there maybe a way to add those KnowledgePackages at startup time
. with no success. If it is inaccessible, then
why the heck it is telling me it is a duplicate when I try to declare it? :)
Thanks guys and gals!
2010/3/8 Edson Tirelli ed.tire...@gmail.com
Thanks for letting us know. Good luck!
Edson
2010/3/8 Moe Alkhafaji moe.alkhaf...@medcpu.com
I just
will fire as default when nothing match.
But maybe I'm totally out of scope
Pavel
2010/3/9 Moe Alkhafaji moe.alkhaf...@medcpu.com:
So, in continuation of the main subject of the email. Unfortunately, I
cannot use activation group because that will only allow me to execute
one
rule out
@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Moe Alkhafaji
Chief Technology Officer, MedCPU
Phone: (630) 290-1113
Email: c...@medcpu.com
This message contains information which may be confidential. Unless you are
the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone
object that action was done? Than you should avoid Status object.
Pavel
2010/3/9 Moe Alkhafaji moe.alkhaf...@medcpu.com:
Thanks Pavel. I was hoping for more of a transparent functionality
supported by Drools than have my users add those control method calls. I
am
trying to make their rules
2010/3/9 Moe Alkhafaji moe.alkhaf...@medcpu.com
Thanks Pavel. I was hoping for more of a transparent functionality
supported by Drools than have my users add those control method calls. I am
trying to make their rules as control logic blind as possible. But, I
guess they would have to do
should be fine.
2010/3/7 Moe Alkhafaji moe.alkhaf...@medcpu.com
OK. I am using the following environment items:
Eclipse: 3.3.2.
Plugins/Features from the link you provided below.
Drools runtime 5.0.1
I still see the same error in Eclipse, however, I am able to compile the
code using
/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/target/
Eclipse 3.5.2.
Drools runtime 5.0.1.
Edson
2010/3/5 Moe Alkhafaji moe.alkhaf...@medcpu.com
Edson,
Just to make sure, can you please send me the link of where you downloaded
your Eclipse plugin from? Also, what version
Is there a way to maybe annotate rules so my server side application
can interpret this annotation as inheritance flag or something?
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 5, 2010, at 11:09 AM, malkhafaji moe.alkhaf...@medcpu.com
wrote:
Hello,
I know, from searching this forum and posting before,
/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Moe Alkhafaji
Chief Technology Officer, MedCPU
Phone: (630) 290-1113
Email: c...@medcpu.com
This message contains information which may be confidential. Unless you are
the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or
any information contained
MPU/src/rules
EEphratOBMain.drlline 11
Line 11 is:
* rule TermContractions 2.8 extends Definitions TermContractions 1.1*
and Definitions TermContractions 1.1 is another rule defined in the same
drl.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Moe Alkhafaji moe.alkhaf...@medcpu.comwrote:
Thanks Edson
(Constants.FINDING_KEYWORD_TEST))
then
mpr.print(Rule TermContractions 2.8 Executed);
end
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Moe Alkhafaji moe.alkhaf...@medcpu.comwrote:
Specifically speaking, here is what I get on Eclipse when I do that:
nds.when cannot be resolved to a
type
Also, remember that unless you use some of the tricks I mentioned
before, both rules will fire.
[]s
Edson
2010/3/5 Moe Alkhafaji moe.alkhaf...@medcpu.com
Here are the rules that I created (sorry for breaking that in multiple
emails), I hope this is all the information needed:
rule
ed.tire...@gmail.com
These error messages don't make much sense to me, but it is accusing
error on line 19 now... considering that I removed lines and the error
before was on line 11, isn't this another problems in rules down in the
file?
Edson
2010/3/5 Moe Alkhafaji moe.alkhaf
22 matches
Mail list logo