o Wolfgang
for pointing your message out and recognizing similarity of the problem.
br
Reinis
On 01/23/2013 09:08 AM, Michiel Vermandel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to group a number of entities together and I'm not sure if my
> rule is optimal.
>
> My planning entities represe
ue(toValue);
scoreDirector.beforeVariableChanged(myPlanningVariableInstance,
"myPlanningVariable"); //notice how I use beforeVariableChanged instead
of afterVariableChanged...
}
}
br
Reinis
On 01/10/2013 03:30 PM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
>
> Op 10-01-13 10:54, Michiel Vermandel schreef:
says what BEST_FIT or, respectively,
BEST_FIT_DECREASING does.
I hope I could at least give you couple of ideas on where to proceed
with the issue.
br
Reinis
On 01/07/2013 09:26 PM, Michiel Vermandel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am struggling with the purpose of difficultyWeightFactoryClass
lassObjectFilter(ConstraintOccurrence.class));
while (it.hasNext()) {
//here you collect constraint occurrences and prepare your
report
}
Hope this helps, for a complete example of the usage of this (internal!)
api see drools planner examples from Geoffrey on Git.
br
Reinis
On 01/
time to help me to
solve my drools problem.
So cheers to you, Wolfgang - a scientist, a mentor, a friend.
Reinis
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
mproved for 100 steps)
used ram: 350 MB - 360MB
used cpu: 50% - 60%
used solution algorithm: simulated annealing and tabu search
I hope this helps.
kind regards
Reinis
On 12/20/2012 01:28 AM, Willem van Asperen wrote:
> On 12/16/2012 02:06 PM, Reinis wrote:
>> Country: Germany
>> Compa
sage
optimization.
kind regards
Reinis
On 12/11/2012 03:40 PM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
> Hi Planner users,
>
> I need your help :)
> Lately, several people have been asking me for public testimonials for
> Drools Planner.
> So if you're a Planner user, would like to say a few words
and number of other less useful changes
still, if I add these rules the calculate count goes down from approx 5300 to
2000 per second which is more than a half.
Thanks and kind regards,
Reinis
On 04/06/2012 01:50 PM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
> I just realized that the graph only prints out valu
n solving this sort of
problem with drools planner?
thanks and br
Reinis
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
rking memory state depend on such sort of things and that it is
intended behavior.
kind regards
Reinis
On 03/10/2012 08:24 PM, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> The Rete algorithm imposes severe restrictions on the way fact updates
> may be performed and the when and where these changes are advert
Final, will look at
> 5.4.0.Beta2 later today.
>
> As far as I can see, the test case asserts the correct result which
> Drools produces anyway?
>
> -W
>
> On 09/03/2012, ge0ffrey <mailto:ge0ffrey.s...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > Great wor
com>> wrote:
>
> Can't reproduce the described effect with 5.3.0.Final, will look at
> 5.4.0.Beta2 later today.
>
> As far as I can see, the test case asserts the correct result which
> Drools produces anyway?
>
> -W
>
&
Hi all,
update. I created JBRULES-3416 now and added unit test to replicate this:
https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/pull/106
If anyone would find the time to cross-check it, would be great!
On 03/04/2012 02:56 PM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
>
> Op 04-03-12 10:43, Reinis schreef:
>
Geoffrey described;
2. retrieve scoreCalculator after firing all rules;
3. assert scoreCalculator.getSoftConstraintsBroken() == 6 (<- and this would be
correct)
Thank you for your hints, guys!
Reinis
On 02/28/2012 11:52 AM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
> Hi Reinis,
>
> So drools-core 5.4.0.
e("reward Resource
consolidation", ConstraintType.POSITIVE
, 1, $leftAssignment, $rightAssignment));
end
*
If I comment the "reward Resource consolidation" rule out, the test case
completes successfully.
*
Is there anything else I can try?
br
Reinis
On 02/27/2012 09:46 AM, Geoffrey
nal
Thank you for the hints! Is the "eval" causing all this trouble?
br
Reinis
On 02/26/2012 06:45 PM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
> 1) If you haven't already, can you turn onTRACE
> and let it run a while (it will be much slower)?
> Report here if that crashes or not.
>
ar to
be correct;
- moves are simple and I tried to keep them consistent with the way
moves in drools-planner examples are constructed;
Would be great if you could give me a hint to what direction I should
look next.
br
Reinis
___
rules-users mailing li
17 matches
Mail list logo
