Re: [rules-users] Drools STREAM Mode performance with rather simple rule

2010-11-15 Thread Roess. Oliver
Hello again! Thanks for the heads up, Wolfgang. Basically, what I try to create is some sort of batch window, which is not really implemented into Drools Fusion if I remember correctly. It doesn't HAVE to be A, B, C in that particular order which I specified in my last post, but the rul

Re: [rules-users] Drools STREAM Mode performance with rather simple rule

2010-11-15 Thread Roess. Oliver
Hello again. Thanks for your test Wolfgang. When I do it like you did, I get approx. the same results. But you misunderstood my scenario. I don't want to send ABC x times. Here's what I meant in pseudocode. for ( i = 0; i < X; i++) Send Y times A Send Y times B

[rules-users] help

2010-11-15 Thread Roess. Oliver
_ SEEBURGER AGVorstand/Seeburger Executive Board: Sitz der Gesellschaft/ Bernd Seeburger, Axel Haas, Michael Kleeberg Registered Office: Edisonstrasse 1

[rules-users] Drools STREAM Mode performance with rather simple rule

2010-11-15 Thread Roess. Oliver
Hello everyone. I've got a question regarding the performance of Drools in STREAM mode. It seems to me, that either Drools is not very fast here, or the problem is with the rule itself. This is the rule. rule "ABC" no-loop when $a : A