Re: [rules-users] BRL and Agenda-group

Sorry user error, I'm ok now, thank you.. what happened was we offered Drools as a windows service and it needed to be re-start it in order for the rule engine to build a new kb. thanks... -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/BRL-and-Agenda-group-tp4020883p4020908

[rules-users] BRL and Agenda-group

Hi, I am using Guvnor 5.4 Final and having a hard time getting BRL rules and agenda group to work. Seems like if I don't assign the agenda-group then the rules would file, but if I set agenda-group (brl, declaratively) and use DRL to set the focus, then the rules don't get fired. Is it possible

[rules-users] Guvnor repository and UNC

Would like to know if anyone has success in setting up the Guvnor repository to use UNC (\\server\somedir). I am keep getting error 6:01:45,374 INFO [org.drools.guvnor.server.security.SecurityServiceImpl] (http--129.172.3.58-8080-1) Logging in user [tony] 16:01:45,608 WARN [org.jboss.seam.secur

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

-pmml41-support-for.html With kind regards, Mike On 23 October 2012 17:51, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi Mike, Whenever you have sometimes, could you take a look at the issue in the user forum that I filed on Oct 22nd, 2012? Many thanks Guvnor 5.4 BRL parsing issue<http://drools

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi Mike, Whenever you have sometimes, could you take a look at the issue in the user forum that I filed on Oct 22nd, 2012? Many thanks Guvnor 5.4 BRL parsing issue Thank You, Tony Nguyen IPDM Advanced Development

[rules-users] Guvnor 5.4 BRL parsing issue

Hi, I ran into this error and wondering if you can confirm if this is a bug. I'm adding a new condition to an existing rule using BRL and got a parsing error (please see pics attached). thx Tony Guvnor5.4_BRL_issue.docx

Re: [rules-users] MVELDialectRuntimeData; local class incompatible

Problem is resolved. What happened was after successfully imported the respository from 5.2 into 5.4, the package from Guvnor was downloaded and used w/o doing a package rebuild (in 5.4) ;) thx -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/MVELDialectRuntimeData-local-cl

Re: [rules-users] MVELDialectRuntimeData; local class incompatible

I am still experiencing this issue, I'm wondering if you have other suggestions that I could follow? -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/MVELDialectRuntimeData-local-class-incompatible-tp4020374p4020389.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at

Re: [rules-users] MVELDialectRuntimeData; local class incompatible

Thanks for suggestion, my classpath is the follow and a pretty simple one... set droolsService_jar=%%/java/drools540/IRIP-DroolsService.jar set droolspojo_jar=%XXX%/java/drools540/IRIP-POJO-Model.jar rem set eclipse_jar=%%/drools/lib/org.eclipse.jdt.core_3.6.0.v_A32a.jar set droolsLibDir=%

[rules-users] MVELDialectRuntimeData; local class incompatible

I am trying to upgrade from 5.2Final to 5.4final and ran into this error. It seems that the rule engine (5.4) is having a hard time building the Knowlege base using PKG directly from Guvnor 5.4. It has no issues with DRL though. Both the Drools Engine and the Guvnor are running Java 1.6.0_20. Bo

Re: [rules-users] The use of 'matches' in Guvnor (and binded variables)

Hi, So thanks for correcting my syntax, it works for me (for DRL) anyway x matches (".*_" + $itemID) but for BRL, no dice...I entered the below in the 'matches' field and it just wouldn't work. .*_$itemID I am using 5.2.0 Final. Would you be able to verify if the above would not work under

Re: [rules-users] The use of 'matches' in Guvnor (and binded variables)

Thanks..I will try that and no, $itemID contain no regular expression (just a plain string with a 'dash' in it) (ex: 12345-01) thx -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/The-use-of-matches-in-Guvnor-and-binded-variables-tp4019417p4019489.html Sent from the Drools: U

Re: [rules-users] The use of 'matches' in Guvnor (and binded variables)

I am not sure if it is my syntax issue or DROOLS (failed to expand binded variable), but I cannot get the 'match' to work using either (BRL or DRL) rules. basically, I want to do this: x matches '.*_$itemID' where $itemID is a binded variable (define in a clause above) I am using Guvnor 5.

[rules-users] The use of 'matches' in Guvnor (and binded variables)

Hi, I would like to know if it is possible to use binded variable in BRL (using matches). For example, I'd like to enter this in 'matches', .*_$itemID (where $itemID is a binded variable set in another fact). thx, -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/The-use-

Re: [rules-users] Issue with Guvnor 5.4.0 Final 'View Source'

yes, will do..thx... -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Issue-with-Guvnor-5-4-0-Final-View-Source-tp4018109p4018114.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list ru

Re: [rules-users] Issue with Guvnor 5.4.0 Final 'View Source'

HI Mike, Firefox 10.0.4 works fine...I don't have Chrome to test it out..so I guess the issue is with IE 8.0.6 only. thx, Tony -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Issue-with-Guvnor-5-4-0-Final-View-Source-tp4018109p4018112.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mai

[rules-users] Issue with Guvnor 5.4.0 Final 'View Source'

I am experiencing this issue with source viewing in the Guvnor (5.4.0 Final). The text are all 'right' justified (please see pic attached) 5.2.0 Final was fine. It is happening in view BRL or DRL rules as well as at the Package level. I am using IE 8.0.6. I am wondering if other folks are expe

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Another JIRA ticket for the javax.jcr.InvalidStateException issue. (GUVNOR-1912). thx, tony -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017930.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com._

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

te a new issue. If raising one for the javax.jcr.InvalidStateException as well please ensure you include all steps to reproduce the error. Thanks, Mike On 13 June 2012 20:44, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi Mike, I am trying to raise an JRA issue (per your email below) but running into

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

another JIRA (and assign to me)? Thanks, Mike On 13 June 2012 16:32, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote: Mike, thanks for taking the time to look into this. This is my observation: 1) Copy Test_R02 from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1' 2) Copy Function '

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

JIRA (and assign to me)? Thanks, Mike On 13 June 2012 16:32, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote: Mike, thanks for taking the time to look into this. This is my observation: 1) Copy Test_R02 from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1' 2) Copy Function 'compare_revs' from

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

efore Jervis, any ideas? On 13 June 2012 18:08, TonyN <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi Mike, I was trying to re-import the old POJO to see how the classes are imported and ran into this error: 1) Create/upload new POJO 2) Entering in new name 3) Hit OK 4) Get the below error. Also failed whe

Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

ted OK. 5) Package built OK. I've attached my repository export to the JIRA for your information (package t1). It was too big to include in this email (email was pending approval before posting to mailing list due to it's size... and that, I guess, will never happen). With kind rega

[rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873

Hi, Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873 Wondering if you can take a look... thx, Tony -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999

[rules-users] DSL statements not showing up...

Hi, I am not seeing DSL statements when using any of the followings in the guided editor: 1) 'Any of the following are true..' 2) 'The following does not exist..' 3) 'The following exists..' Steps: a) select any choice above b) Select 'Click to add patterns...' c) select Choo

Re: [rules-users] 'Condition' dialog screen size too narrow (BRL)

ok, Mike..and I think I made a typo. should say 'height' instead of 'width'... -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Condition-dialog-screen-size-too-narrow-BRL-tp3935733p3936071.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

[rules-users] 'Condition' dialog screen size too narrow (BRL)

Hi, I am wondering if folks have this issue: When I'm in the guided editor and open the 'condition' dialog to add more conditions, the width of the condition dialog rendered is only about 1.5 inches (which is way too small to display all the DSLs that we have). This makes it very user-unfriendly

Re: [rules-users] Nested class, BRL and Java (error)

JIRA ticket opened (GUVNOR-1873)... Thx -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Nested-class-BRL-and-Java-error-tp3932432p3933348.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users maili

Re: [rules-users] Nested class, BRL and Java (error)

Thanks Mike...will do! -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Nested-class-BRL-and-Java-error-tp3932432p3933172.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ rules-users mailing list rules-user

Re: [rules-users] Nested class, BRL and Java (error)

Hi, I downloaded the Guvnor 5.4.0 CR1 and problem is still there (I am assuming the fix is in this CR release too?). I would like to send this image to show one of class in the domain model that contains nested classes. TcItem contains Dataset contains NamedReferences http://drools.46999.n3.

[rules-users] Nested class, BRL and Java (error)

Hi, I have nested classes in the domain model and I imported these nested classes in order to use them in the guided editor. Things are ok except when one of the rule required a custom java function, then I would get an error at 'build' package time (the error is 'not able to resolve TcItem$Datas