Is there a way to have a decision table behave with a vloopup? Basically we
have a metadata column which the user can select from a drop down. This then
drives the values of the action columns. This works except that instead of
the value of the vlookup I see the actual vlookup text(i.e something
think there are problems with Apache POI resolving formulas across
different worksheets (but am guessing based on some other changes we had
to
make regarding linked workbooks).
On 17 June 2014 16:36, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote:
Is there a way to have a decision table behave
On 17 June 2014 17:25, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote:
They are different sheets. Basically we have a our tables on sheet 1 and
sheet 2 is populated from an import of data from an external datasource
to
allow a vlookup of information(so the business user can see the data/and
we
are free format DRL IIRC).
Sent on the move
On 11 Jun 2014 18:56, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote:
What is the proper way to do modify in a decision table? I know this is
a
very generic question but was wondering if anyone has experience with
this
and could offer insight(I have
Curiosity question: Why does the @Modifies not have the @Inherited
annotation, allowing subclasses to inherit a method which may modify
something in the parent? Perhaps I have a misunderstanding of annotations
in this case but still am just wondering.
--
View this message in context:
This sounds like something that could be accomplished with Planner. Is that
the case or am I completely off the mark here? My company is looking at
technologies to do case base planning and since we already use drools for
other business rules figure I would poke around
--
View this message in
/wiki/Case-based_reasoning?
If the number of identical variables, added with weights, is the
target function, a simple search strategy should be sufficient for
finding the best past case.
-W
On 18/03/2014, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote:
This sounds like something that could
Agreed and understood. I am not throwing out any solid conclusions about an
approach. I can also see a case for technical rules.
laune wrote
On 18/03/2014, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote:
That is correct and that is my thought. My company I feel likes to over
complicate things at times
with @PropertyReactive before
you load the jar in guvnor?
Davide
On 02/25/2014 11:53 PM, gboro54 wrote:
test-drools.zip
lt;http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n4028329/test-drools.zipgt;
Here is a sample project which shows the issue. You can build the project
as
the fact model and upload
that the rules and the
classes live in the same package
I'll get back to you later
Davide
On 02/26/2014 03:59 PM, gboro54 wrote:
No luck adding ProperReactive to the classes(in the sample project).
Davide Sottara wrote
I think I see the problem - though I haven't been able to test
Is there a way to download the drl of a snapshot? I know you can see the
rules in the Guvnor(uneditable of course) but is there a way to actual
download the DRL file?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Source-from-Snapshot-in-Guvnor-5-6-tp4028355.html
Sent from
/com.test/Test
Davide Sottara wrote
Yes, instead of the URL
http:// ... /packages/ [my pack ] / binary
use
http:// ... /packages/ [my pack ] / source
On 02/26/2014 10:24 PM, gboro54 wrote:
Is there a way to download the drl of a snapshot? I know you can see the
rules
Doing something like
http://.../package/com.test/Test.drl
shows the drl but it looks like imports are missing(along with globals)
gboro54 wrote
How to you specify which snapshot to grab from? I.e you build your pkg
then create a snapshot. I want the source from the specific snapshot
Also note we are using property reactive listener always. The rules do modify
an object that a bunch of the rules use however the modified property is not
being evaluated(i.e no rule is checking the property at the moment).
--
View this message in context:
, gboro54 wrote:
Also note we are using property reactive listener always. The rules do
modify
an object that a bunch of the rules use however the modified property is
not
being evaluated(i.e no rule is checking the property at the moment).
--
View this message in context:
http://drools
a single rule
using a single
@propertyReactive class?
On 02/25/2014 09:25 PM, gboro54 wrote:
Also note we are using property reactive listener always. The rules do
modify
an object that a bunch of the rules use however the modified property is
not
being evaluated(i.e no rule is checking
I turned off the demo stuff as we really didn't want that in our linux
environment. As for the example I am not sure. I would start a new thread
and not high-jack an older thread in this case.
--
View this message in context:
Is there a built Guvnor artifact for expert 5.6.0.cr1? Using the 5.5.0
version of Guvnor against the 5.6.1 runtime does not work(as I would
expected). This is only a temporary until we get the knew kie-workbench up
and running with Drools 6.
--
View this message in context:
Final works just fine...Thanks!
anjana.ackroyd wrote
http://downloads.jboss.org/drools/release/
I dont see a CR1 why not use Final?
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:26 AM, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote:
Is there a built Guvnor artifact for expert 5.6.0.cr1? Using the 5.5.0
version
Is there a way to setup the kie workbench to point to an internal maven repo
to pull internal libraries?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/kie-workbench-external-maven-repo-tp4027897.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi! I am trying to install the Kie-workbench war to a jboss 7 environment and
get the exception below. I would imagine this is because of firewall and my
company will not open a connection to this repo. My question: is there a way
to have the deployment go through without loading the example
clone of a demo application from GitHub.
This System Property takes precedence over org.kie.example. Default: true
org.kie.example: Enables example structure composed by Repository,
Organization Unit and Project. Default: false
Mark
On 23 Jan 2014, at 18:38, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote
I am seeing a weird pattern(or at least unexpected one) when running drools
5.5 in property reactive mode. I have to rules such as:
rule Rule 1
when
$order:Order(orderType==A, orderVolume1000)
then
insert(new Charge($order,code1,-.25));
end
rule Rule 2
when
This issue seems to be related to:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Property-reactive-broken-in-5-5-0-Final-td4021231.html
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Property-reactive-broken-in-5-5-0-Final-td4021231.html
--
View this message in context:
I plan to do an update to 6 early next month(that was planned before this
issue).
Thanks!
Mark Proctor wrote
a lot has been fixed in 5.6 and 6.0. Please either try 5.6.CR1 or
6.0.FINAL.
Mark
On 25 Nov 2013, at 15:33, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote:
This issue seems to be related
So I have an object with a map like follows:
protected ConcurrentMapString, Double accumulations = new
ConcurrentHashMapString, Double();
I wrote a convince method on the class that will look up the value in the
map and add to it if it exists and
if not there will put it in the map:
So if the property lives in the parent abstract class and that is where the
method existed. If I move the method to the child with the annotation
@Modifies it works.
Any ideas why putting that in the parent abstract would not be honored?
--
View this message in context:
I stumbled across this article today:
http://decisionmanagementsolutions.com/blog/2013/10/09/first-look-red-hat-jboss-brms-and-drools-community-project-update/
This got me thinking if this integration will be offered in the community
project or will this only be done in the enterprise version?
Nov 2013, at 17:02, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote:
I stumbled across this article today:
http://decisionmanagementsolutions.com/blog/2013/10/09/first-look-red-hat-jboss-brms-and-drools-community-project-update/
This got me thinking if this integration will be offered in the community
Thanks for the information Mark!
Mark Proctor wrote
Some of it has been migrated to uberfire. Some is still standalone, and
will be migrated over next year.
Mark
On 8 Nov 2013, at 18:06, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote:
Understood. I just haven't read anything about this until
I have rules like the following:
rule Add Baseline to Context if it does not exists exists or not greater
then 0
no-loop true
when
$context:Context($id:id,baselineParticipation==null ||
So move the math to the rhs? Will that resolve the issues in your opinion?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-5-divide-by-0-exception-tp4026582p4026586.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ever zero?
On 1 Nov 2013, at 16:17, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote:
I have rules like the following:
rule Add Baseline to Context if it does not exists exists or not
greater
then 0
no-loop true
when
$context:Context($id:id,baselineParticipation==null
I changed the rules to the following so I will test and see:
rule Add Baseline to Context if it does not exists exists or not greater
then 0
no-loop true
when
$context:Context($id:id,baselineParticipation==null ||
try to divide by zero.
So … first question … is consolidatdVolume.avgVolume ever zero?
On 1 Nov 2013, at 16:17, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote:
I have rules like the following:
rule Add Baseline to Context if it does not exists exists or not
greater
then 0
no-loop true
(!) must be executed in the order they are
written, or that the C/Java semantics for logical expression
evaluation is applied.
-W
On 01/11/2013, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote:
Could you expand upon why this is a poor practice? I assumed that if a
part
of the pattern doesn't match
Another question(on error interpretation) the stack trace seems to indicate
an issue with the consequence and not the condition. Should it be assumed
that seeing such errors could indicate an issue on either side of the rule?
--
View this message in context:
usually happens in practice)
You also have multiple threads... is that avgVolume computed using an
accumulate
somewhere? I wonder if there are critical races.
On 11/01/2013 11:17 AM, gboro54 wrote:
Agreed. In this case it is possible to move to the RHS...but I have to
ask
what if I need
In guvnor 5.5, when trying to convert an excel based decision table to a web
based one, using the convert button, we get the following exception:
.drools.guvnor.client.rpc.AssetService.convertAsset(java.lang.String,java.lang.String)
throws com.google.gwt.user.client.rpc.SerializationException'
Created Jira: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-2057
manstis wrote
Can you please raise a JIRA for Guvnor and attach a XLS file demonstrating
the bug.
Thanks
Sent on the move
On 23 Oct 2013 15:59, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote:
In guvnor 5.5, when trying to convert
I have a map that contains a map(MapString, Maplt;String,Object). I know
you get to the first map via mapField[key] but how do you then access the
object in the second map?
I have tried mapField[parentKey][childKey] and
mapField[parentKey].[childKey]. I also tried binding the parent map to
a
That is what I thought but just wanted to confirm that there was no other
way.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Multi-level-map-access-Drools-5-5-tp4026284p4026290.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I have the following three rules:
rule Create Acct Context
when
$Acct:Acct()
not (exists(AcctContext(Acct ==$Acct)))
then
insert(new AcctContext($Acct));
end
rule Add Acct Statuses to AcctContext
no-loop true
when
Looking at the Rest API I don't see a way to get a list of available
snapshots for a given package. Is there a way to do this?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-5-5-get-available-snapshots-for-package-tp4025565.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum
Trying to access this via webdav I get a 404 when I hit the following link:
http://localhost:8080/guvnor/org.drools.guvnor.Guvnor/webdav/com.example.package/
Any thoughts?
--
View this message in context:
gboro54 wrote
Trying to access this via webdav I get a 404 when I hit the following
link:
http://localhost:8080/guvnor/org.drools.guvnor.Guvnor/webdav/com.example.package/
Any thoughts?
This seems to be related to https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1986.
When I try it with a windows
Here is the stack trace
JAAS authentication failed: javax.security.auth.login.FailedLoginException:
Password Incorrect/Password Required
at
org.jboss.security.auth.spi.UsernamePasswordLoginModule.login(UsernamePasswordLoginModule.java:270)
[picketbox-4.0.7.Final.jar:4.0.7.Final]
I am trying to craft rules which deal with percentage of 2 numbers(some
percentages are like .1%). A rule like the following I can't get to fire
for bigger numbers. Any thoughts on this would be great!
rule 'Added through MPID 0.1% TCV'
when
billableItem:BillableItem(code in (A,7,8),
does 1.5 fall...stupid me)
As per usual this was user error
laune wrote
What do you mean by for bigger numbers?
-W
On 14 August 2013 18:56, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote:
I am trying to craft rules which deal with percentage of 2 numbers(some
percentages are like .1%). A rule like
Hi!,
For a decision table is there a way to have a condition column for which
the user just specifies weather the condition is active or deactivate(i.e
specify true or false) but which they only specify active or not.
Thanks,
Mike
--
View this message in context:
Any input on this? If not I will just test(was just trying to save the time )
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Kagent-and-Resource-Scanning-tp4024141p4024213.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The methods ResourceFactory.getResourceChangeNotifierService().start() and
ResourceFactory.getResourceChangeScannerService().start() start the scanning
services in Drools. My question is does this apply to all knowledge agents
within an application or does this need to be done for all kAgents
I am evaluating 6.0.0.beta1 and seem to have issues with the KnowledgeBase.
It looks like it is marked with @Deprecated. What is the proper way to build
the KnowledgeBase in 6(as the documentation still refers to this way).
TIA!
--
View this message in context:
Thanks Mark! I will do my best to reverse engineer what is needed from the
examples. Is there a good place to get information on changes to the drools
syntax(if any) or additional information on the new algorithms implemented(I
know RETE was going bye-bye)?
--
View this message in context:
We basically have a batch application which needs to be able to pump through
2 billion records and apply a relatively small ruleset(say a couple hundred
rules). My thought is to look at doing something with Drools and Hadoop but
I am wondering if anyone else has done a large dataset such as this(I
I am trying to deploy an application onto JBoss 7.1 running drools 5.4 and I
am getting the following error. Any thoughts?
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.google.protobuf.MessageOrBuilder from
[Module deployment.fbms.ear.fbms-service.jar:main from Service Module
Loader]
at
We are using expert and fusion to monitor connection events in our system. We
would like to know the most efficient way to know that X number pair of
events have happened in a certain example(i.e eventA and eventB occurred 4
times each in the 5 seconds). What is the most efficient way to do this?
I thought it was? Perhaps I worded it wrong. I need to do something similar
to what I stated but the accumulate doesn't want to take the syntax stated
below. Perhaps this is not possible or I am doing something wrong?
laune wrote
On 03/10/2012, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote:
Doesn't
in the dark.
-W
On 3 October 2012 19:31, gboro54 lt;
gboro54@
gt; wrote:
I thought it was? Perhaps I worded it wrong. I need to do something
similar
to what I stated but the accumulate doesn't want to take the syntax
stated
below. Perhaps this is not possible or I am doing something
Based on testing expiring an event does no remove it from working memory.
What is the best way to manage working memory in the case that after a
period of X seconds you want the event removed? Would you simply write a
rule that would do a retract after a certain window i.e
rule Closed Connection
Thanks. I believe you are correct(my threshold is small this is just for some
testing purposes.) I like the idea you have come up with.
Thanks!
Davide Sottara wrote
What you have written counts how many times a connection to the same
endpoint (I'm assuming the connectionInformationId
You are correct from what I have seen...
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Caillard, Quentin [via Drools]
ml-node+s46999n4019621...@n3.nabble.com wrote:
Sorry, it is a quite old thread. But i am experiencing some jitting error
with the 5.4.0.Final. If I well understand, the jitting error
I believe this is an issue with the retract in 5.4. I removed all forms of
salience to see if there was a race condition caused by that. Still got the
same exception. I then took it one step more and added agenda groups and set
the order in such a way that the retract rules would be the last
So I keep getting the exceptions below. I have surrounded the fireAllRules
with a try catch throwable block to try and debug this but I never seem to
be able to catch it. This only happens in the first couple 100 invocations
of the fireAllRules then never happens again(sometimes it never happens
I don't think it would be outrageous to build a stateful session per user.
The expensive part is building the knowledge base. Session creation is
cheap.
slyfox wrote
been thinking about this a lot. I know the real solution is to use
logical inserts but I'm wondering how it would work in my
Any thoughts on this at all?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/MVEL-optimizer-error-tp4018714p4018877.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
rules-users mailing list
trace to figure out which rule may be causing this? After a retract I
thought all other activations on the agenda for the tuple should be
cancelled. Is this a wrong assertion?
TIA
gboro54 wrote
I am having an issue with an optimizer stack trace on my linux QA box that
I can't seem to reproduce
I am having an issue with an optimizer stack trace on my linux QA box that I
can't seem to reproduce on my windows development box. The stack trace is:
13:01:50,188 ERROR [stderr] (Thread-123) Exception in thread Thread-123
java.lang.RuntimeException: unable to invoke method:
We recently upgraded to drools 5.4 and are getting the following exception
when trying to compile our dsl and dslrs. Could this be related to our JVM
version(1.6.0_12)?
Caused by: java.lang.StackOverflowError
at java.util.regex.Pattern$Loop.match(Pattern.java:4275)
[rt.jar:1.6.0_12]
We are not running solaris we are on Centos with a Sun JVM. However I believe
the issue is the same and am working on upgrading the JVM on our boxes.
Mario Fusco wrote
I think this is definitively related with the version of the JVM you're
using. Exactly the same problem has been already
Even after updating to 1.6.0_31 we still get the following:
Caused by: java.lang.StackOverflowError
at java.util.regex.Pattern$GroupTail.match(Pattern.java:4227)
[rt.jar:1.6.0_31]
at java.util.regex.Pattern$BranchConn.match(Pattern.java:4078)
[rt.jar:1.6.0_31]
at
/\\*.*?\\*/
would serve the same purpose while not causing a stack overflow.
Tested with javac 1.6.0_23
-W
On 09/07/2012, gboro54 lt;gboro54@gt; wrote:
Even after updating to 1.6.0_31 we still get the following:
Caused by: java.lang.StackOverflowError
at java.util.regex.Pattern
I would like to add more then one DSL file to a DSLR file. I understand that
semantically the knowledge base will allow this but is there away to allow
eclipse the ability to view the DRL when multiple DSLs are being used? I
found JBRULES-1615 but I am not sure if this was actually resolved or
I am using drools 5.4 and am running into a weird issue with using modify
keyword. I have have two rules, both are similar in conditions(one rule
catches 2 additional cases to modify the object with a generic message).
Weather I add the checks for each rule into the into the generic rule or
have a
with
the @Modifies method.
laune wrote
On 06/06/2012, gboro54 lt;gboro54@gt; wrote:
I am using drools 5.4 and am running into a weird issue with using modify
keyword. I have have two rules, both are similar in conditions(one rule
catches 2 additional cases to modify the object with a generic
Sorry for that. You are correct more information should have been provided to
allow for help. Usually I am better at this but hurried myself a little this
morning
gboro54 wrote
Thanks for the insightI was able to figure it out with have the
generic rule listen for modifications
I just updated to Drools 5.4 and I am not getting the following error on all
my map accessors:
10:41:12,997 ERROR [stderr] (Thread-169) Exception in thread Thread-169
java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception jitting: feeKeys[1] == null
10:41:12,998 ERROR [stderr] (Thread-169)at
rule Rule1 trade
no-loop true
when
$tsc:TradeSideContext(trade!=null,primarySide!=null,contraSide!=null)
$trade:Trade($tradeDate:tradeDate, tradeSource == O) from
$tsc.trade
$ps:TradeSide(capacity.capacityCode ==
It looks like the rule executes(based on my unit test the proper element is
placed in the list) and it always seems to happen on the my last execution.
In addition I have noticed that the evaluations seem to be handled on other
threads. Is this correct behavior?
gboro54 wrote
rule Rule1
Mario,
That is what i expected(just wanted to verify). Let me know if any
additional information is needed...
Mario Fusco wrote
In Drools 5.4 we added an optimization that JITs constraints (i.e. compile
them in bytecode) after they have been evaluated for a given amount of
times
Thanks Mario! That seems to have resolved the issue. I look forward to your
fix.
Mario Fusco wrote
Ok, I've been able to reproduce your issue. I'll fix it asap and keep you
updated on how I am progressing.
The only (ugly) workaround I could find at the moment is to replace
feeKeys[1] with
I have created multiple DRLs declaring the same packaged(logical separation
of rules). When I compile this knowledge base with all the files does the
rete tree get built as if all the rules were in the same file or does each
file get it's own built tree?
--
View this message in context:
of usage of multi-thread with rules is for chaining
multiple rule box having distinct kbase, so I never tried that.
- Mail original -
De: gboro54 lt;gboro54@gt;
À: rules-users@.jboss
Envoyé: Jeudi 10 Mai 2012 19:12:28
Objet: [rules-users] Knowledge Base and Multiple Sessions
Is there ever a case to use the batch executor with a stateful knowledge
session? Would it be better to insert a large number of records using the
insert or is it better to insert 1 at a time?
--
View this message in context:
If you have multiple sessions running on different threads against the same
knowledge base, is there any performance hit during evaluation?
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Knowledge-Base-and-Multiple-Sessions-tp3977702.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum
I am not currently using agenda-groups. I believe my issue right now is one
of thread safety. A little background: I currently have a thread pulling
messages from a database running on the main thread. In several other
threads, I have drools session being fired every so often. It appears that
parallel to the
one(s)
doing insertions doesn't make sense to me.
-W
On 08/05/2012, gboro54 lt;gboro54@gt; wrote:
I am not currently using agenda-groups. I believe my issue right now is
one
of thread safety. A little background: I currently have a thread pulling
messages from a database
parallel to the
one(s)
doing insertions doesn't make sense to me.
-W
On 08/05/2012, gboro54 lt;gboro54@gt; wrote:
I am not currently using agenda-groups. I believe my issue right now is
one
of thread safety. A little background: I currently have a thread pulling
messages from a database
.
laune wrote
What about executing insert(s) followed by fireAllRules() in one thread?
-W
On 08/05/2012, gboro54 lt;gboro54@gt; wrote:
What do you recommend? firUntilHalt seems to get locked out after
sometime... I am running out of ideas and have posted this question
before.
I believe
Perhaps a blocking queue which has facts put on from other threads, the
thread then inserts x number of facts and fires the rule set?
gboro54 wrote
The point is to be able to stream a large volume of messages into the rule
session without tying up that thread. In addition I don't want
If you specify agenda-groups on rules, then in the rule set have rules which
will set focus onto that agenda-group does the group of rules only use the
facts which cause the group to be pushed to the stack or does it evaluate
all objects in working memory?
--
View this message in context:
)
- ruleflow-group : once the agenda has no more rules of this group, the
ruleflow is used to set the next current group
- Mail original -
De: gboro54 lt;gboro54@gt;
À: rules-users@.jboss
Envoyé: Lundi 7 Mai 2012 15:30:48
Objet: [rules-users] agenda-groups
If you specify agenda
Rule authoring in Drools can be done in 2 ways: with the Eclipse or Guvnor. I
am not sure what you mean by a Rules Authoring Engine though. What
requirements to you have for rule authoring? Are business users or developer
authoring rules?
vsm wrote
Drools is a Business Rules Management
I know using salience is not the best way to order rules but some of our
rules do have a higher priority then others. Since we are writing the rules
using a DSL I have created set set of Priority levels which set the
salience. One of these levels set salience to 0(default value). Is there any
harm
That is what I figured ...just wanted a second opinion.
Mark Proctor wrote
On 02/05/2012 18:09, gboro54 wrote:
I know using salience is not the best way to order rules but some of our
rules do have a higher priority then others. Since we are writing the
rules
using a DSL I have created
I am utilizing a dsl with a dslr. In my DSL I have a condition work Customer
which maps to a string value. Is there way to prevent the dsl from replacing
this work in certain cases? For example
ruleT1
when
Object(value==Customer Help)
then
...
end
When I run the DSL obviously
Not sure if I am right but I believe he has a memory restriction which forces
him not to be able to load a full result set from a query and then feed this
objects into the engine as facts. Unless you have some complicated logic I
would probably do the loading logic outside of the rules. Feed X
I will take a stab at answering this:
-Modify and Retract will cause the tree to be re-evaluated for the current
facts in memory. This may cause new activations or cancellations to occur.
Be forewarned that a rule that modifies a fact may cause a continuous loop
if the conditions for that rule are
Is there a way to use contains with an object? i.e
obj:Object(collection contains SubObject(string=TST,int=1))
I know you could do a from but we are writing a DSL and it would be great if
I could accomplish something like this above
TIA!
--
View this message in context:
I guess I could also have a method on my main object that takes parameters
and just do a not null check...
gboro54 wrote
Is there a way to use contains with an object? i.e
obj:Object(collection contains SubObject(string=TST,int=1))
I know you could do a from but we are writing a DSL
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
