Re: [rules-users] Check if fact is subset of items in the rule

I got it to work using eval like so when ... eval($mycontext.isNotSubset("STRING1", "STRING2","STRING3", "STRING4")) I have the logic in isNotSubset method in context class to check if the set the context is subset of array passed in the call to the method. This works but I believe this c

Re: [rules-users] Check if fact is subset of items in the rule

Wolf, in my case the superset in the rule is hard-coded in each rule. Each rule can have different values in the set. -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Check-if-fact-is-subset-of-items-in-the-rule-tp1680013p1681143.html Sent from the Drools -

Re: [rules-users] Check if fact is subset of items in the rule

yes, Superset is defined in the rule and subset comes from the fact. -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Check-if-fact-is-subset-of-items-in-the-rule-tp1680013p1681036.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

Re: [rules-users] Matching strings in two arrays

Wolfgang Laun-2 wrote: > > You could define a new operator (similar to "contains" or "memberOf") that > tests whether a field - a set of values - is a subset of a another set of > values. > > See my home page for a full recipe: http://members.inode.at/w.laun/ > > The code given there is for b

Re: [rules-users] Using CGLIB BeanGenerator generated instance as fact object

Digging further I found that 5.x version supports Declared Types. However it seems that it is only limited to primitives and Classes right now. I got a simple sample with primitives working. However I have a need to pass an array of string as a instance variable. Is this possible right now? Th

Re: [rules-users] Matching strings in two arrays

This works great for the case where all entries in fact matches all entries in rule. I have a case where a subset of facts can exist in the set of rule. How would I construct the rule in this case without using the exits and from as I did initially? so MyContext.classes has subset "TStr1", "TSt

Re: [rules-users] Matching strings in two arrays

Esteban wrote: > > I must be missing something. If you want to check if all the three strings > are present in each array, why are you using OR (||)? > > If you don't want to model the array as a class containing the "parent" > reference and insert them as facts, you can try this: > > MyContex

Re: [rules-users] Matching strings in two arrays

Thomas, Thanks for the suggestions. Swindells, Thomas wrote: > > Also have you tried just using ==, eg exists( String(this == > "TestString1") || String(this == "TestString2") || String(this == > "TestString3") from DclassesList) > This did reduce the time by about 50 ms. Swindells, Thomas