Re: [rules-users] How to define keywords that represent objects(in facts) to be able to use in rules

2012-08-23 Thread san_drools
Thanks Laune and sorry for a bit delayed reply. Now, I got some more information from you. I will experiment on this part with your suggestions and see. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-define-keywords-that-represent-objects-in-facts-to-be-able-to-use-in

Re: [rules-users] How to define keywords that represent objects(in facts) to be able to use in rules

2012-08-10 Thread san_drools
Hello Laune, Yes, we can use parameters in DSL phrases. But the problem here is rule author doesn't know which object to refer. And, can we translate a business rule with keywords into DRL? You can use "$ContactNum" from the DRL translation. It's not "h

Re: [rules-users] How to define keywords that represent objects(in facts) to be able to use in rules

2012-08-09 Thread san_drools
Hello manstis, can you please see my reply to Laune describing what actually my requirement is and suggest something? And why i felt ever #condition and #action needs to be in DSL configuration. Here, the keyword is something like this "PersonMobileContact" --> Object

Re: [rules-users] How to define keywords that represent objects(in facts) to be able to use in rules

2012-08-09 Thread san_drools
Laune, the problem is when i define a keyword like i said above "PersonMobileContact" for Object1($ContactNum : contactNumber && contacttype == "mobile"). In business rule, i can use this keyword. This is ok, but if i want to set this $ContactNum into another object i.e. Object2. I thin

Re: [rules-users] How to define keywords that represent objects(in facts) to be able to use in rules

2012-08-09 Thread san_drools
Hello Laune, Yes, the Object and attribute names are meaningful but in our case they are a bit lengthy and wanted to give rule author more convinience in writing rules. For example, when we need to write Object1($contactNo : contactNumber && contacttype == "mobil

[rules-users] How to define keywords that represent objects(in facts) to be able to use in rules

2012-08-09 Thread san_drools
r this? Or is there any option/feature we can proceed with? Please let me know. Thanks in advance. Regards San_Drools -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/How-to-define-keywords-that-represent-objects-in-facts-to-be-able-to-use-in-rules-tp4019065.h