Re: [rules-users] Serialization in Drools 5.0 M2

0.7. Best Regards! Siddhartha Mark Proctor wrote: > > Siddhartha Banik wrote: >> Hi Michal, >> >> Thanks for your reply. >> I have got a better idea about marshalling now. After I have made the >> changes you suggested, the things are working now. >>

Re: [rules-users] Serialization in Drools 5.0 M2

to handle date/time stuff at the moment. Implementations have not been added for accumulate, collect, from and rightinputadapter. If these issues are fixed in Drools 5.0 M2 release? Best Regards! Siddhartha Siddhartha Banik wrote: > > Hi Drools Team, > > I am trying out new Se

[rules-users] Serialization in Drools 5.0 M2

Hi Drools Team, I am trying out new Serialization technique introduced in Drools 5.0 using " org.drools.marshalling.DefaultMarshaller". The use case I am trying, is: Create a Stateful session. Then Serialize that.

[rules-users] Serialization in Drools 5.0 M2

Hi Drools Team, I am trying out new Serialization technique introduced in Drools 5.0 using "org.drools.marshalling.DefaultMarshaller". The use case I am trying, is: Create a Stateful session. Then Serialize that.

Re: [rules-users] Facing an issue with Drools Query

Hi, Sending this to just bring back this post into everybody's notice again. We are planning to move bellow mentioned queries[last 3] to production on coming Thursday. So your suggestions/ findings are highly appreciated. Thanks Siddhartha -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble

Re: [rules-users] Rule is firing on those objects for which that hasalready fired

Thanks for the reply. This really helped me to think a bit more. >http://downloads.jboss.com/drools/docs/4.0.7.19894.GA/html/ch06s05.html#d0e3834 > the "exists" statement is described which has almost the functionality which you want. >Unfortunately (but intuitively) you cannot access variabl

[rules-users] Rule is firing on those objects for which that has already fired

Hi All, I am using Drools Stateful session with serialized Rule Base & Working memory for my application. I need to write some rule which will *only* fire on newly inserted data points in Working Memory. Does Drools support any such feature which will help me to achieve this ? Any suggestion, how

[rules-users] Re : Drools 4.0.x branch has still some issues with serialization

Hi Drools Team, I have checked out *Drools 4.0.x branch* & found that all my test scenarios with *"Dynamic Rules"* are now *working fine* *:-)*. Thanks a lot for fixing the issues so promptly. I appreciate it !!! Now, we will definitely use Drools in our application. I have a *Good To have* fea

[rules-users] Re: rules-users Digest, Vol 15, Issue 16

program & test rules. Thanks Siddhartha > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:12:40 +0530 > From: "siddhartha banik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [rules-users] Facing Problem with Working Memory >Serialization/DeSerialization > To: