I might be wrong, but I think DRL - BRL is still not possible.
Just had a look at org.drools.ide.common.server.util.BRDRLPersistence, and
we have the following:
public RuleModel unmarshal(String str) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException(
Still not possible to
You are right, of course. The BRL editor has its own XML format.
I just wonder whether going through a DrlParser - DrlDumper cycle might
produce a sufficiently well-behaved DRL text that could be easily enough
transformed to the BRL XML. But nothing of this is in the stable API, so
it would be
The thing is that, afaik, the DrlParser in itself doesn't give you something
that you can use to generate the BRL XML, even for a well-behaved DRL. You
would have to do some sort of model-to-model transformation that would have
RuleModel as an outcome. With the RuleModel at hand you can easily
On 14/09/2010 21:17, Leonardo Gomes wrote:
The thing is that, afaik, the DrlParser in itself doesn't give you
something that you can use to generate the BRL XML, even for a
well-behaved DRL. You would have to do some sort of model-to-model
transformation that would have RuleModel as an
2010/9/14 Mark Proctor mproc...@codehaus.org
Exactly, we don't want to mature and promote a proprietary XML and waste
the time and create the confusion from not following a standard.
Any XML standard for rules and especially production system rules is way
behind what systems like Drools,
There is a short hint in the Expert Manual, subsection 4.11.3, where
conversion between DRL and XML using classes such as DrlParser and XmlDumper
is discussed. A .brk is just the native Drools XML format.
-W
On 14 September 2010 01:17, Leonardo Gomes leonardo.f.go...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Amisha,
