Vincent and Wolfgang, thanks for for clearing things up for me. The first
approach is definitely not what we want and I now see how this could
potentially cause issues. In fact we'll probably need to re-evaluate how
some of our rules are written.
- Larry
--
View this message in context:
http:
Vincent has answered this very well. I'd just like to point out that
you might read a verbal interpretation of the conditions to yourself,
and judge for yourself.
(a) When there is a RuleContect where the billingSystem equals "ABC"
and there is a RuleContext where the policyStatus is equals "activ
ill not clear)
- Mail original -
De: "larryc"
À: rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 18 Avril 2012 18:15:09
Objet: [rules-users] Best way to write a rule where pattern has multiple
constraints
I was reviewing some of our DRLs and noticed some rules written like thi
I was reviewing some of our DRLs and noticed some rules written like this:
when
RuleContext(billingSystem == "ABC")
RuleContext(policyStatus == "active")
RuleContext(renewalDueDate != null)
then ...
while others were written this way:
when
RuleContext(billingSystem == "ABC", policySt
